Suppr超能文献

与反刍动物和其他前肠发酵动物相比,骆驼科动物中溶质和不同大小颗粒的消化物滞留模式。

Digesta retention patterns of solute and different-sized particles in camelids compared with ruminants and other foregut fermenters.

作者信息

Dittmann Marie T, Runge Ullrich, Ortmann Sylvia, Lang Richard A, Moser Dario, Galeffi Cordula, Schwarm Angela, Kreuzer Michael, Clauss Marcus

机构信息

Clinic for Zoo Animals, Exotic Pets and Wildlife, Vetsuisse Faculty Zurich, University of Zurich, Winterthurerstr. 260, 8057, Zurich, Switzerland.

出版信息

J Comp Physiol B. 2015 Jul;185(5):559-73. doi: 10.1007/s00360-015-0904-x. Epub 2015 Apr 29.

Abstract

The mean retention times (MRT) of solute or particles in the gastrointestinal tract and the forestomach (FS) are crucial determinants of digestive physiology in herbivores. Besides ruminants, camelids are the only herbivores that have evolved rumination as an obligatory physiological process consisting of repeated mastication of large food particles, which requires a particle sorting mechanism in the FS. Differences between camelids and ruminants have hardly been investigated so far. In this study we measured MRTs of solute and differently sized particles (2, 10, and 20 mm) and the ratio of large-to-small particle MRT, i.e. the selectivity factors (SF(10/2mm), SF(20/2mm), SF(20/10mm)), in three camelid species: alpacas (Vicugna pacos), llamas (Llama glama), and Bactrian camels (Camelus bactrianus). The camelid data were compared with literature data from ruminants and non-ruminant foregut fermenters (NRFF). Camelids and ruminants both had higher SF(10/2mm)FS than NRFF, suggesting convergence in the function of the FS sorting mechanism in contrast to NRFF, in which such a sorting mechanism is absent. The SF(20/10mm)FS did not differ between ruminants and camelids, indicating that there is a particle size threshold of about 1 cm in both suborders above which particle retention is not increased. Camelids did not differ from ruminants in MRT(2mm)FS, MRTsoluteFS, and the ratio MRT(2mm)FS/MRTsoluteFS, but they were more similar to 'cattle-' than to 'moose-type' ruminants. Camelids had higher SF(10/2mm)FS and higher SF(20/2mm)FS than ruminants, indicating a potentially slower particle sorting in camelids than in ruminants, with larger particles being retained longer in relation to small particles.

摘要

溶质或颗粒在胃肠道和前胃(FS)中的平均停留时间(MRT)是食草动物消化生理学的关键决定因素。除反刍动物外,骆驼科动物是唯一进化出反刍这一强制性生理过程的食草动物,反刍包括对大食物颗粒的反复咀嚼,这需要在前胃中有颗粒分选机制。到目前为止,骆驼科动物和反刍动物之间的差异几乎没有得到研究。在本研究中,我们测量了三种骆驼科动物:羊驼(Vicugna pacos)、美洲驼(Llama glama)和双峰驼(Camelus bactrianus)中溶质和不同大小颗粒(2毫米、10毫米和20毫米)的MRT以及大颗粒与小颗粒MRT的比值,即选择性因子(SF(10/2mm)、SF(20/2mm)、SF(20/10mm))。将骆驼科动物的数据与来自反刍动物和非反刍前肠发酵动物(NRFF)的文献数据进行了比较。骆驼科动物和反刍动物的SF(10/2mm)FS均高于NRFF,这表明与不存在这种分选机制的NRFF相比,前胃分选机制的功能存在趋同。反刍动物和骆驼科动物的SF(20/10mm)FS没有差异,表明在这两个亚目中都存在一个约1厘米的粒径阈值,超过该阈值颗粒滞留时间不会增加。骆驼科动物在MRT(2mm)FS、MRT溶质FS以及MRT(2mm)FS/MRT溶质FS比值方面与反刍动物没有差异,但它们与“牛型”反刍动物比与“驼鹿型”反刍动物更相似。骆驼科动物的SF(10/2mm)FS和SF(20/2mm)FS高于反刍动物,这表明骆驼科动物的颗粒分选可能比反刍动物慢,大颗粒相对于小颗粒的滞留时间更长。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验