Clauss Marcus, Lechner-Doll Matthias
Institute of Animal Physiology, Physiological Chemistry and Animal Nutrition, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Veterinaerstrasse 13, 80539, Munich, Germany.
Institute of Zoo Biology and Wildlife Research, Berlin, Germany.
Oecologia. 2001 Nov;129(3):321-327. doi: 10.1007/s004420100735. Epub 2001 Nov 1.
The measurement of passage rate is important for the concept of ruminant diversification. While supporters of Hofmann's 1989 feeding type classification claim that browsing ruminants have faster passage rates than grazing ruminants, other researchers consider the passage rate to depend on body size alone. To date, no convincing comparison of ruminant passage rates has been put forward. For comparative purposes, we suggest the use of the "selectivity factor", which is an expression of how much longer particles of a defined size (<2 mm) are retained in the ruminant digestive tract than fluids. From the limited data available, it seems that grazing ruminants display selectivity factors between 1.56 and 3.80, whereas browsers have a much narrower range of 1.14-1.80. This suggests that browsers are not able to selectively retain particles as long as grazers. Intake of browsers, on the other hand, may not be limited by physical fill of the forestomach to the same degree as in grazers. This result can explain several observations on the digestive physiology of browsers, some of which have been linked to a rumen bypass mechanism. We propose that the ability for selective particle retention is a key factor for understanding the physiological consequences of ruminant diversification.
通过率的测定对于反刍动物多样化的概念很重要。虽然霍夫曼1989年食性分类的支持者声称,采食树叶的反刍动物比放牧的反刍动物具有更快的通过率,但其他研究人员认为通过率仅取决于体型大小。迄今为止,尚未提出令人信服的反刍动物通过率比较。为了进行比较,我们建议使用“选择性因子”,它表示特定大小(<2毫米)的颗粒在反刍动物消化道中比液体保留的时间长多少。从现有的有限数据来看,放牧的反刍动物的选择性因子似乎在1.56至3.80之间,而采食树叶的反刍动物的选择性因子范围则窄得多,为1.14 - 1.80。这表明采食树叶的反刍动物不能像放牧的反刍动物那样长时间选择性地保留颗粒。另一方面,采食树叶的反刍动物的采食量可能不像放牧的反刍动物那样受到前胃物理充盈的限制。这一结果可以解释关于采食树叶的反刍动物消化生理学的一些观察结果,其中一些与瘤胃旁路机制有关。我们认为,选择性保留颗粒的能力是理解反刍动物多样化生理后果的关键因素。