Gharib Alma, Mier Daniela, Adolphs Ralph, Shimojo Shinsuke
Division of Biology & Biological Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA.
Department of Clinical Psychology, Central Institute of Mental Health, University of Heidelberg/Medical Faculty Mannheim, Germany.
Neuropsychologia. 2015 Jun;72:70-9. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.04.027. Epub 2015 Apr 25.
People with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) have been reported to show atypical attention and evaluative processing, in particular for social stimuli such as faces. The usual measure in these studies is an explicit, subjective judgment, which is the culmination of complex-temporally extended processes that are not typically dissected in detail. Here we addressed a neglected aspect of social decision-making in order to gain further insight into the underlying mechanisms: the temporal evolution of the choice. We investigated this issue by quantifying the alternating patterns of gaze onto faces, as well as nonsocial stimuli, while subjects had to decide which of the two stimuli they preferred. Surprisingly, the temporal profile of fixations relating to choice (the so-called "gaze cascade") was entirely normal in ASD, as were the eventual preference choices. Despite these similarities, we found two key abnormalities: people with ASD made choices more rapidly than did control subjects across the board, and their reaction times for social preference judgments were insensitive to choice difficulty. We suggest that ASD features an altered decision-making process when basing choice on social preferences. One hypothesis motivated by these data is that a choice criterion is reached in ASD regardless of the discriminability of the options.
据报道,自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)患者表现出非典型的注意力和评估过程,尤其是对于面部等社会刺激。这些研究中常用的测量方法是明确的主观判断,这是复杂的、时间上延伸的过程的 culmination,而这些过程通常不会被详细剖析。在这里,我们探讨了社会决策中一个被忽视的方面,以便进一步深入了解潜在机制:选择的时间演变。我们通过量化在受试者必须决定他们更喜欢两种刺激中的哪一种时,对面部以及非社会刺激的注视交替模式来研究这个问题。令人惊讶的是,与选择相关的注视时间轮廓(所谓的“注视级联”)在ASD中完全正常,最终的偏好选择也是如此。尽管有这些相似之处,我们发现了两个关键异常:ASD患者在所有情况下做出选择的速度都比对照组受试者快,并且他们对社会偏好判断的反应时间对选择难度不敏感。我们认为,ASD在基于社会偏好进行选择时,其决策过程发生了改变。由这些数据引发的一个假设是,ASD患者无论选项的可辨别性如何,都能达到一个选择标准。