Suppr超能文献

急诊科环境中用于治疗妊娠恶心和呕吐的止吐药比较。

Comparison of antiemetics for nausea and vomiting of pregnancy in an emergency department setting.

作者信息

Mayhall Elizabeth A, Gray Robyn, Lopes Vrishali, Matteson Kristen A

机构信息

Women & Infants Hospital, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI.

Women & Infants Hospital, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI.

出版信息

Am J Emerg Med. 2015 Jul;33(7):882-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2015.03.032. Epub 2015 Mar 18.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare time from medication administration to disposition from the Emergency Department (ED) between women treated for nausea and vomiting of pregnancy with different antiemetic agents.

DESIGN

We performed a retrospective cohort study of women 13 weeks gestation or less treated in our Women and Infants Hospital ED for nausea and vomiting of pregnancy between 2009 and 2011. Data was collected on patient demographics, antiemetics used, and time to disposition. We analyzed time of administration of the antiemetic used first line (ondansetron versus metoclopramide versus promethazine or prochlorperazine) to time the discharge order was placed.

RESULTS

We analyzed data from 439 women treated in the ED for nausea and vomiting of pregnancy. Forty-four percent received ondansetron alone, 47% received any other antiemetic alone, and 9% received more than one agent first line. Antiemetic agent selected did not differ by patient age, parity, current treatment for nausea and vomiting in pregnancy, orthostatics, ketonuria or disposition. We found no difference in time from medication administration to disposition between women who received ondansetron and women who received any other antiemetic (metoclopramide, prochlorperazine or promethazine). Adjusting for potential confounders, compared to patients who received any other first line therapy, patients who received ondansetron had 2.09 times the odds of having a time to disposition at or above the 75th percentile (95% CI 1.31-3.34).

CONCLUSIONS

The use of ondansetron in the ED for nausea and vomiting of pregnancy was associated with similar mean time from administration to disposition as other antiemetics.

摘要

目的

比较使用不同止吐药物治疗妊娠恶心和呕吐的女性从用药到离开急诊科(ED)的时间。

设计

我们对2009年至2011年期间在我院妇女儿童医院急诊科接受治疗的妊娠13周及以下的恶心和呕吐女性进行了一项回顾性队列研究。收集了患者人口统计学数据、使用的止吐药物以及出院时间的数据。我们分析了一线使用的止吐药物(昂丹司琼与甲氧氯普胺与异丙嗪或氯丙嗪)给药时间至下达出院医嘱的时间。

结果

我们分析了439名在急诊科接受妊娠恶心和呕吐治疗的女性的数据。44%的患者仅接受昂丹司琼治疗,47%的患者仅接受其他任何一种止吐药物治疗,9%的患者一线接受了不止一种药物治疗。所选止吐药物在患者年龄、产次、当前妊娠恶心和呕吐治疗情况、直立性低血压、酮尿症或出院情况方面无差异。我们发现接受昂丹司琼治疗的女性与接受其他任何止吐药物(甲氧氯普胺、氯丙嗪或异丙嗪)治疗的女性从用药到出院的时间没有差异。在调整潜在混杂因素后,与接受其他一线治疗的患者相比,接受昂丹司琼治疗的患者有2.09倍的几率在第75百分位数或以上的时间出院(95%置信区间1.31 - 3.34)。

结论

在急诊科使用昂丹司琼治疗妊娠恶心和呕吐与其他止吐药物从给药到出院的平均时间相似。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验