Shinn J H, Essington E H, Miller F L, O'Farrell T P, Orcutt J A, Romney E M, Shugart J W, Sorom E R
Environmental Sciences Division, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA 94550.
Health Phys. 1989 Nov;57(5):771-9. doi: 10.1097/00004032-198911000-00011.
We have conducted experiments to evaluate the effectiveness of removing contaminated soils from the Nevada Test Site with a large truck-mounted vacuum cleaner. Our results show that this method is effective, relatively easy, and safe for equipment operators. With four passes of the truck-mounted vacuum, 92% of the 241Am (and the accompanying 239 + 240Pu) was removed and resuspension rates were reduced by more than 99%. The ecological impact was, however, serious in terms of soil erosion and destruction of small animal habitats. Compared to standard earth-moving techniques, vacuuming permits a significant reduction in the volume of soil collected to achieve the desired level of decontamination, and the volume reduction could result in cost savings for packaging, shipment, and burial. This cost savings would only be realized for projects involving decontamination of the top 5 cm of soil.
我们进行了实验,以评估用大型车载吸尘器清除内华达试验场受污染土壤的效果。我们的结果表明,这种方法有效、相对容易操作,且对设备操作人员安全。经过四次车载吸尘器作业,92%的镅-241(以及伴随的钚-239和钚-240)被清除,再悬浮率降低了99%以上。然而,就土壤侵蚀和小动物栖息地破坏而言,其生态影响较为严重。与标准的土方工程技术相比,吸尘可大幅减少为达到所需去污水平而收集的土壤量,而体积的减少可节省包装、运输和掩埋成本。这种成本节省仅适用于涉及清除表层5厘米土壤污染的项目。