• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对化疗反应良好的转移性软组织肉瘤患者的治疗成本。北美和欧洲肉瘤治疗与疾病负担(SABINE)研究。

Cost of treatment in patients with metastatic soft tissue sarcoma who respond favourably to chemotherpy. The SArcoma treatment and Burden of Illness in North America and Europe (SABINE) study.

作者信息

Jönsson L, Justo N, Musayev A, Krishna A, Burke T, Pellissier J, Judson I, Staddon A, Blay J Y

机构信息

Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institut, Stockholm.

Mapi Group, Stockholm, Sweden.

出版信息

Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2016 May;25(3):466-77. doi: 10.1111/ecc.12322. Epub 2015 Apr 28.

DOI:10.1111/ecc.12322
PMID:25923192
Abstract

Treatment of metastatic soft tissue sarcoma (mSTS) commonly includes multiple lines of chemotherapy, until a decline in performance status precludes further treatment. The primary objective of this study was to describe the lifetime healthcare resource utilisation and cost among mSTS patients with favourable response to chemotherapy. SABINE was a multi-centre (n = 25), multi-country (n = 9) retrospective chart review study of mSTS patients with favourable response to chemotherapy following 4 cycles. Healthcare resource utilisation was collected from first line until death or end of follow-up. Costs were analysed by health states (defined by treatment line, chemotherapy use and disease progression) and estimated by multiplying the mean weekly cost per health state by the expected number of weeks spent in each health state. Expected per-patient lifetime medical cost was €65 616 (95% CI: €51 454-€85 003); comprised of IV chemotherapy (31.7%), inpatient care (24.8%), concomitant medication (11.0%), oral chemotherapy (8.9%), outpatient visits (8.8%), radiotherapy (6.3%), hospice (4.0%), imaging (3.7%) and laboratory (0.7%). Weekly costs were 280-330% higher during chemotherapy treatment periods than off-chemotherapy, especially after disease progression. Per-patient costs were highest in the USA and lowest in the Netherlands and UK. The economic burden of mSTS is considerable and the amount of resources devoted to its treatment varies across countries.

摘要

转移性软组织肉瘤(mSTS)的治疗通常包括多线化疗,直到患者体能状态下降无法继续治疗。本研究的主要目的是描述对化疗反应良好的mSTS患者一生的医疗资源利用情况和成本。SABINE是一项多中心(n = 25)、多国(n = 9)的回顾性图表审查研究,研究对象为4个周期后对化疗反应良好的mSTS患者。收集从一线治疗到死亡或随访结束期间的医疗资源利用情况。按健康状态(由治疗线、化疗使用情况和疾病进展定义)分析成本,并通过将每个健康状态的平均每周成本乘以在每个健康状态下预计花费的周数来估算。每位患者一生的预期医疗成本为65616欧元(95%置信区间:51454 - 85003欧元);包括静脉化疗(31.7%)、住院护理(24.8%)、辅助用药(11.0%)、口服化疗(8.9%)、门诊就诊(8.8%)、放疗(6.3%)、临终关怀(4.0%)、影像学检查(3.7%)和实验室检查(0.7%)。化疗治疗期间的每周成本比非化疗期间高280 - 330%,尤其是在疾病进展后。每位患者的成本在美国最高,在荷兰和英国最低。mSTS的经济负担相当大,且各国用于其治疗的资源量有所不同。

相似文献

1
Cost of treatment in patients with metastatic soft tissue sarcoma who respond favourably to chemotherpy. The SArcoma treatment and Burden of Illness in North America and Europe (SABINE) study.对化疗反应良好的转移性软组织肉瘤患者的治疗成本。北美和欧洲肉瘤治疗与疾病负担(SABINE)研究。
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2016 May;25(3):466-77. doi: 10.1111/ecc.12322. Epub 2015 Apr 28.
2
Chemotherapy treatment patterns and clinical outcomes in patients with metastatic soft tissue sarcoma. The SArcoma treatment and Burden of Illness in North America and Europe (SABINE) study.转移性软组织肉瘤患者的化疗治疗模式和临床结局。北美和欧洲软组织肉瘤治疗和疾病负担(SABINE)研究。
Ann Oncol. 2012 Oct;23(10):2763-2770. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mds070. Epub 2012 Apr 6.
3
Economic impact of healthcare resource utilisation patterns among patients diagnosed with advanced melanoma in the United Kingdom, Italy, and France: results from a retrospective, longitudinal survey (MELODY study).英国、意大利和法国晚期黑色素瘤患者医疗资源利用模式的经济影响:一项回顾性、纵向调查(MELODY 研究)的结果。
Eur J Cancer. 2012 Sep;48(14):2175-82. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2012.03.003. Epub 2012 Apr 3.
4
Healthcare resource utilization among patients with relapsed multiple myeloma in the UK, France, and Italy.英国、法国和意大利复发多发性骨髓瘤患者的医疗资源利用情况。
J Med Econ. 2018 May;21(5):450-467. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2017.1421546. Epub 2018 Jan 10.
5
Resource implications of palliative chemotherapy for ovarian cancer.卵巢癌姑息化疗的资源影响
J Clin Oncol. 1997 Mar;15(3):1000-7. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1997.15.3.1000.
6
Doxorubicin alone versus intensified doxorubicin plus ifosfamide for first-line treatment of advanced or metastatic soft-tissue sarcoma: a randomised controlled phase 3 trial.多柔比星单药与强化多柔比星联合异环磷酰胺一线治疗晚期或转移性软组织肉瘤的随机对照 3 期试验。
Lancet Oncol. 2014 Apr;15(4):415-23. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(14)70063-4. Epub 2014 Mar 5.
7
Quality of Life and Utility in Patients with Metastatic Soft Tissue and Bone Sarcoma: The Sarcoma Treatment and Burden of Illness in North America and Europe (SABINE) Study.转移性软组织和骨肉瘤患者的生活质量与效用:北美和欧洲肉瘤治疗与疾病负担(SABINE)研究
Sarcoma. 2012;2012:740279. doi: 10.1155/2012/740279. Epub 2012 Mar 20.
8
Resource Utilization and Safety of Outpatient Management Following Intensive Induction or Salvage Chemotherapy for Acute Myeloid Leukemia or Myelodysplastic Syndrome: A Nonrandomized Clinical Comparative Analysis.强化诱导或挽救化疗后急性髓系白血病或骨髓增生异常综合征门诊管理的资源利用和安全性:一项非随机临床对比分析。
JAMA Oncol. 2015 Nov;1(8):1120-7. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.2969.
9
Direct costs of glaucoma and severity of the disease: a multinational long term study of resource utilisation in Europe.青光眼的直接成本与疾病严重程度:欧洲资源利用的多国长期研究
Br J Ophthalmol. 2005 Oct;89(10):1245-9. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2005.067355.
10
Direct hospital resource utilization and costs of treating patients with multiple myeloma in Southwest Sweden: a 5-year retrospective analysis.瑞典西南部多发性骨髓瘤患者的直接医院资源利用及治疗成本:一项5年回顾性分析
Clin Ther. 2008 Sep;30(9):1704-13. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2008.09.003.

引用本文的文献

1
Epidemiology, Treatment Patterns, Survival, Healthcare Resource Utilization, and Costs of Dedifferentiated Liposarcoma (DDLPS) in Canada: A Retrospective Cohort Study Using Administrative Databases in Ontario.加拿大去分化脂肪肉瘤(DDLPS)的流行病学、治疗模式、生存率、医疗资源利用及成本:一项使用安大略省行政数据库的回顾性队列研究
Curr Oncol. 2025 May 9;32(5):273. doi: 10.3390/curroncol32050273.
2
Direct Costs of Care for Adults with Soft Tissue Sarcomas: A Population-Based Study.软组织肉瘤成年患者的直接护理成本:一项基于人群的研究。
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Jun 24;14(13):3109. doi: 10.3390/cancers14133109.
3
Cost-effectiveness analysis of imaging surveillance in stage II and III extremity soft tissue sarcoma: an Australian perspective.
II期和III期肢体软组织肉瘤影像学监测的成本效益分析:澳大利亚视角
Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2020 Feb 3;18:5. doi: 10.1186/s12962-020-0202-7. eCollection 2020.
4
Health Care Resource Utilization and Costs among Adult Patients with Advanced Soft Tissue Sarcoma: A Retrospective Medical Record Review in the United Kingdom, Spain, Germany, and France.成年晚期软组织肉瘤患者的医疗资源利用与成本:英国、西班牙、德国和法国的一项回顾性病历审查
Sarcoma. 2018 Sep 12;2018:2020591. doi: 10.1155/2018/2020591. eCollection 2018.
5
UK and Twenty Comparable Countries GDP-Expenditure-on-Health 1980-2013: The Historic and Continued Low Priority of UK Health-Related Expenditure.英国和二十个可比国家的卫生支出占 GDP 之比:1980 年至 2013 年英国卫生支出的历史和持续低优先级。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2016 Sep 1;5(9):519-523. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2016.93.
6
Comparing UK and 20 Western countries' efficiency in reducing adult (55-74) cancer and total mortality rates 1989-2010: Cause for cautious celebration? A population-based study.比较英国与20个西方国家在1989 - 2010年期间降低成人(55 - 74岁)癌症和总死亡率方面的效率:值得谨慎庆祝吗?一项基于人群的研究。
JRSM Open. 2016 Jun 6;7(6):2054270416635036. doi: 10.1177/2054270416635036. eCollection 2016 Jun.