Kim Hyungsuk, Mun Goo-Hyun, Wiraatmadja Elrica Sapphira, Lim So-Young, Pyon Jai-Kyong, Oh Kap Sung, Lee Jeong Eon, Nam Seok Jin, Bang Sa-Ik
Department of Plastic Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 135-710, South Korea.
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2015 Jun;39(3):369-76. doi: 10.1007/s00266-015-0493-9. Epub 2015 Apr 30.
Preoperative breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a routine test for oncologic evaluation. However, determining breast volume using a preoperative MRI obtained as a part of oncologic evaluation has not yet been attempted for immediate breast reconstruction. The study introduces the benefit of MRI-based volumetry, not only in autologous breast reconstruction but also in implant-based breast reconstruction.
Forty patients preparing for autologous breast reconstruction with a deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flap and 30 patients for implant-based breast reconstruction from June 2011 to June 2012 were included in this study. In every DIEP case, we collected data about actual resected breast tissue weight during mastectomy and final flap weight inserted intraoperatively. Computed tomography (CT) was for preoperative CT angiography for microsurgical breast reconstruction, whereas MRI was performed for oncologic evaluation. In every implant-based reconstruction case, MRI-based breast volume was measured in the same way for DIEP patients and resected breast tissue weight was measured intraoperatively. In addition, we also added or subtracted the breast volume by any modification, such as reduction and augmentation on the ipsilateral or contralateral side. To determine the accuracy of MRI-based volumetry, Pearson correlation coefficients were calculated to quantify the correlation between CT and MRI-based volumetry data and intraoperative volume measurements.
For DIEP patients, the mean resected breast tissue weight during mastectomy was more closely related to the mean estimated breast volume using MRI than to the mean estimated breast volume using CT (Pearson coefficient 0.928 and 0.782; p = 0.001). MRI gave a closer correlation to final flap weight than CT (Pearson correlation coefficient 0.959 and 0.873; p = 0.001). For implant-based reconstruction patients, the breast volume measured by MRI correlated closely with the actual mean weight of resected breast specimens (0.937; p = 0.001). Mean net implanted volume was more closely related to mean estimated breast volume using MRI than to mean resected breast tissue weight during mastectomy (0.893 and 0.880; p = 0.001).
Reliable volumetric information can be obtained using MRI for breast implant volume and autologous tissue needed in optimizing symmetry in breast reconstruction.
This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
术前乳腺磁共振成像(MRI)是肿瘤学评估的常规检查。然而,尚未尝试将作为肿瘤学评估一部分所获得的术前MRI用于即刻乳房重建来测定乳房体积。本研究介绍了基于MRI的体积测定法的益处,这不仅适用于自体乳房重建,也适用于假体植入式乳房重建。
本研究纳入了2011年6月至2012年6月期间准备行带蒂腹直肌下动脉穿支(DIEP)皮瓣自体乳房重建的40例患者以及准备行假体植入式乳房重建的30例患者。在每例DIEP手术病例中,我们收集了乳房切除术期间实际切除的乳腺组织重量以及术中植入的最终皮瓣重量的数据。计算机断层扫描(CT)用于术前CT血管造影以进行显微外科乳房重建,而MRI用于肿瘤学评估。在每例假体植入式重建病例中,以与DIEP患者相同的方式测量基于MRI的乳房体积,并在术中测量切除的乳腺组织重量。此外,我们还根据同侧或对侧的任何改变(如缩小或增大)对乳房体积进行增减。为了确定基于MRI的体积测定法的准确性,计算Pearson相关系数以量化基于CT和MRI的体积测定数据与术中体积测量之间的相关性。
对于DIEP患者,乳房切除术期间平均切除的乳腺组织重量与使用MRI估计的平均乳房体积的相关性比与使用CT估计的平均乳房体积的相关性更密切(Pearson系数分别为0.928和0.782;p = 0.001)。与CT相比,MRI与最终皮瓣重量的相关性更密切(Pearson相关系数分别为0.959和0.873;p = 0.001)。对于假体植入式重建患者,MRI测量的乳房体积与切除的乳腺标本的实际平均重量密切相关(0.937;p = 0.001)。平均净植入体积与使用MRI估计的平均乳房体积的相关性比与乳房切除术期间平均切除的乳腺组织重量的相关性更密切(0.893和0.880;p = 0.001)。
使用MRI可获得可靠的体积信息,用于确定乳房重建中优化对称性所需的乳房假体体积和自体组织。
证据等级IV:本刊要求作者为每篇文章指定证据等级。有关这些循证医学评级的完整描述,请参阅目录或作者在线指南www.springer.com/00266 。