Zemek Roger, Eady Kaylee, Moreau Katherine, Farion Ken J, Solomon Beverly, Weiser Margaret, Dematteo Carol
*Departments of Pediatrics and Emergency Medicine,Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario,University of Ottawa,ON.
†Clinical Research Unit,Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute,University of Ottawa,ON.
CJEM. 2015 Mar;17(2):115-22. doi: 10.1017/cem.2014.38.
Introduction The diagnosis of concussion is a critical step in the appropriate management of patients following minor head trauma. The authors hypothesized that wide practice variation exists among pediatric emergency medicine physicians in the application of physical and cognitive rest recommendations following an acute concussion.
The authors developed a 35-item questionnaire incorporating case vignettes to examine pediatric emergency physician knowledge of concussion diagnosis, understanding of initial management using return-to-play/school/work guidelines, use of existing concussion protocols, and perceived barriers to protocol use. Using a modified Dillman technique, the authors distributed an online survey to members of Pediatric Emergency Research Canada, a national association of pediatric emergency physicians.
Of 176 potential participants, 115 (65%) responded to the questionnaire, 89% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.81, 0.93) of whom reported having diagnosed 20 or more concussions annually. Although 90% (95% CI: 0.83, 0.94) of respondents adequately diagnosed concussion, only 64% (95% CI: 0.54, 0.72) correctly applied graduated return-to-play guidelines. Cognitive rest recommendations were also frequently limited: 40% (95% CI: 0.31, 0.49) did not recommend school absence, 30% (95% CI: 0.22, 0.39) did not recommend schoolwork reduction, and 35% (95% CI: 0.27, 0.45) did not recommend limiting screen time. Eighty percent (95% CI: 0.72, 0.87) of respondents reported having used guidelines frequently or always to guide clinical decisions regarding concussion.
Despite a proficiency in the diagnosis of concussion, pediatric emergency physicians exhibit wide variation in recommending the graduated return to play and cognitive rest following concussion.
引言 脑震荡的诊断是轻度头部创伤后患者适当管理的关键步骤。作者推测,在急性脑震荡后,儿科急诊医学医生在应用身体和认知休息建议方面存在很大的实践差异。
作者编制了一份包含病例 vignettes 的35项问卷,以检查儿科急诊医生对脑震荡诊断的知识、对使用恢复比赛/上学/工作指南进行初始管理的理解、现有脑震荡协议的使用情况以及协议使用的感知障碍。作者采用改良的迪尔曼技术,向加拿大儿科急诊研究协会(一个全国性的儿科急诊医生协会)的成员分发了一份在线调查问卷。
在176名潜在参与者中,115名(65%)回复了问卷,其中89%(95%置信区间[CI]:0.81,0.93)报告每年诊断出20例或更多脑震荡。虽然90%(95%CI:0.83,0.94)的受访者能够正确诊断脑震荡,但只有64%(95%CI:0.54,0.72)正确应用了逐步恢复比赛指南。认知休息建议也经常受到限制:40%(95%CI:0.31,0.49)不建议缺课,30%(95%CI:0.22,0.39)不建议减少学业,35%(95%CI:0.27,0.45)不建议限制屏幕时间。80%(95%CI:0.72,0.87)的受访者报告经常或总是使用指南来指导关于脑震荡的临床决策。
尽管儿科急诊医生在脑震荡诊断方面表现出一定水平,但在推荐脑震荡后逐步恢复比赛和认知休息方面存在很大差异。