Stern Robert A, Seichepine Daniel, Tschoe Christine, Fritts Nathan G, Alosco Michael L, Berkowitz Oren, Burke Peter, Howland Jonathan, Olshaker Jonathan, Cantu Robert C, Baugh Christine M, Holsapple James W
1 Boston University Alzheimer's Disease and CTE Center; Departments of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Anatomy and Neurobiology, Boston University School of Medicine , Boston, Massachusetts.
2 Boston University Alzheimer's Disease and CTE Center , Boston, Massachusetts.
J Neurotrauma. 2017 Feb 15;34(4):861-868. doi: 10.1089/neu.2016.4475. Epub 2016 May 19.
Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines can facilitate proper evaluation and management of concussions in the emergency department (ED), often the initial and primary point of contact for concussion care. There is no universally adopted set of guidelines for concussion management, and extant evidence suggests that there may be variability in concussion care practices and limited application of clinical practice guidelines in the ED. This study surveyed EDs throughout New England to examine current practices of concussion care and utilization of evidence-based clinical practice guidelines in the evaluation and management of concussions. In 2013, a 32-item online survey was e-mailed to 149/168 EDs throughout New England (Connecticut, Rhode Island, Massachusetts, Vermont, New Hampshire, Maine). Respondents included senior administrators asked to report on their EDs use of clinical practice guidelines, neuroimaging decision-making, and discharge instructions for concussion management. Of the 72/78 respondents included, 35% reported absence of clinical practice guidelines, and 57% reported inconsistency in the type of guidelines used. Practitioner preference guided neuroimaging decision-making for 57%. Although 94% provided written discharge instructions, there was inconsistency in the recommended time frame for follow-up care (13% provided no specific time frame), the referral specialist to be seen (25% did not recommend any specialist), and return to activity instructions were inconsistent. There is much variability in concussion care practices and application of evidence-based clinical practice guidelines in the evaluation and management of concussions in New England EDs. Knowledge translational efforts will be critical to improve concussion management in the ED setting.
基于证据的临床实践指南有助于在急诊科(ED)对脑震荡进行恰当的评估和管理,而急诊科通常是脑震荡护理的初始和主要接触点。目前尚无一套被普遍采用的脑震荡管理指南,现有证据表明,在急诊科,脑震荡护理实践可能存在差异,且临床实践指南的应用有限。本研究对新英格兰地区的急诊科进行了调查,以检查脑震荡护理的当前实践以及在脑震荡评估和管理中基于证据的临床实践指南的使用情况。2013年,一项包含32个项目的在线调查通过电子邮件发送给了新英格兰地区(康涅狄格州、罗德岛州、马萨诸塞州、佛蒙特州、新罕布什尔州、缅因州)168家急诊科中的149家。受访者包括高级管理人员,他们被要求报告其急诊科在临床实践指南的使用、神经影像学决策以及脑震荡管理的出院指导方面的情况。在纳入的72/(共78名)受访者中,35%报告没有临床实践指南,57%报告所使用的指南类型不一致。57%的神经影像学决策由从业者偏好决定。尽管94%提供了书面出院指导,但在后续护理的推荐时间框架(13%未提供具体时间框架)、建议就诊的转诊专科医生(25%未推荐任何专科医生)以及恢复活动指导方面存在不一致。在新英格兰地区的急诊科,脑震荡护理实践以及基于证据的临床实践指南在脑震荡评估和管理中的应用存在很大差异。知识转化工作对于改善急诊科的脑震荡管理至关重要。