Borenstein Jason, Shamoo Adil E
a School of Public Policy , Georgia Institute of Technology , Atlanta , Georgia , USA.
Account Res. 2015;22(5):267-83. doi: 10.1080/08989621.2014.968277.
The size and complexity of research teams continues to grow, especially within the realms of science and engineering. This has intensified already existing concerns about relying on traditional authorship schemes as the way to allocate credit for a contribution to a research project. In this paper, we examine current authorship problems plaguing research communities and provide suggestions for how those problems could potentially be mitigated. We recommend that research communities, especially those involved in large scale collaborations, revisit the contributor model and embrace it as means for allocating credit more authentically and transparently.
研究团队的规模和复杂性持续增长，尤其是在科学和工程领域。这加剧了人们对依赖传统作者署名方式来分配研究项目贡献功劳的现有担忧。在本文中，我们审视了困扰研究界的当前作者署名问题，并就如何可能缓解这些问题提供建议。我们建议研究界，尤其是那些参与大规模合作的研究界，重新审视贡献者模式，并将其作为更真实、透明地分配功劳的一种方式加以采用。
