Suppr超能文献

资深学者如何支持可重复性和开放性研究:简短的三步指南。

What senior academics can do to support reproducible and open research: a short, three-step guide.

机构信息

Department of Neuroimaging, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.

Forensic and Neurodevelopmental Sciences, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology, Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.

出版信息

BMC Res Notes. 2022 Mar 22;15(1):116. doi: 10.1186/s13104-022-05999-0.

Abstract

Increasingly, policies are being introduced to reward and recognise open research practices, while the adoption of such practices into research routines is being facilitated by many grassroots initiatives. However, despite this widespread endorsement and support, as well as various efforts led by early career researchers, open research is yet to be widely adopted. For open research to become the norm, initiatives should engage academics from all career stages, particularly senior academics (namely senior lecturers, readers, professors) given their routine involvement in determining the quality of research. Senior academics, however, face unique challenges in implementing policy changes and supporting grassroots initiatives. Given that-like all researchers-senior academics are motivated by self-interest, this paper lays out three feasible steps that senior academics can take to improve the quality and productivity of their research, that also serve to engender open research. These steps include changing (a) hiring criteria, (b) how scholarly outputs are credited, and (c) how we fund and publish in line with open research principles. The guidance we provide is accompanied by material for further reading.

摘要

越来越多的政策被引入来奖励和认可开放研究实践,而许多基层倡议也正在促进这些实践被纳入研究常规。然而,尽管得到了广泛的认可和支持,以及早期职业研究人员的各种努力,开放研究仍未得到广泛采用。为了使开放研究成为常态,倡议应该让所有职业阶段的学者参与,特别是高级学者(即高级讲师、研究员、教授),因为他们的日常工作涉及到研究质量的确定。然而,高级学者在实施政策变革和支持基层倡议方面面临着独特的挑战。鉴于像所有研究人员一样,高级学者也是出于自身利益的考虑,本文提出了高级学者可以采取的三个可行步骤,以提高他们的研究质量和生产力,同时也有助于推动开放研究。这些步骤包括改变(a)招聘标准,(b)如何认可学术成果,以及(c)如何根据开放研究原则资助和出版。我们提供的指导意见附有进一步阅读的材料。

相似文献

5
A personal reflection upon navigating into a senior academic role.对步入高级学术角色的个人反思。
Front Sociol. 2023 Jun 21;8:979691. doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2023.979691. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

2
A manifesto for reproducible science.可重复科学宣言。
Nat Hum Behav. 2017 Jan 10;1(1):0021. doi: 10.1038/s41562-016-0021.
3
Documenting contributions to scholarly articles using CRediT and tenzing.使用 CRediT 和 tenzing 记录学术文章的贡献。
PLoS One. 2020 Dec 31;15(12):e0244611. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0244611. eCollection 2020.
4
The Hong Kong Principles for assessing researchers: Fostering research integrity.《评估研究人员的香港原则:促进研究诚信》
PLoS Biol. 2020 Jul 16;18(7):e3000737. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000737. eCollection 2020 Jul.
6
The citation advantage of linking publications to research data.将出版物与研究数据关联的引文优势。
PLoS One. 2020 Apr 22;15(4):e0230416. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0230416. eCollection 2020.
8
Research Culture and Reproducibility.研究文化与可重复性。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2020 Feb;24(2):91-93. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2019.12.002. Epub 2019 Dec 28.
10
A consensus-based transparency checklist.基于共识的透明度清单。
Nat Hum Behav. 2020 Jan;4(1):4-6. doi: 10.1038/s41562-019-0772-6.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验