Peter Burkhard, Vogel Sarah E, Prade Tanja, Geiger Emilia, Mohl John C, Piesbergen Christoph
a Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität , Munich , Germany.
Am J Clin Hypn. 2014 Jul;57(1):13-40. doi: 10.1080/00029157.2014.906152.
This article is an exploratory study investigating the relationship between hypnotizability, personality style, and attachment. Data were collected from 99 students by means of the Harvard Group Scale of Hypnotic Susceptibility, Form A; Personality Styles and Disorders Inventory; and Relationship Scale Questionnaire. Results suggest that individual personality styles accounted for a significant amount of variance in hypnotizability in: (a) the whole sample, (b) the securely attached, and (c) the insecurely attached. High hypnotizables among both the whole sample and securely attached individuals shared the unselfish/self-sacrificing personality style as a main predictor of hypnotizability and displayed elevated scores for the charming/histrionic and the optimistic/rhapsodic personality style. Furthermore, two groups were identified among the high hypnotizables that differed mainly according to attachment style: one consists of securely attached, charming/histrionic, and optimistic/rhapsodic people, who are best described by socio-cognitive theories. The other is composed of insecurely attached intuitive/schizotypal people, who are better depicted by dissociation theories.
本文是一项探索性研究，旨在调查催眠感受性、人格类型和依恋之间的关系。通过哈佛团体催眠易感性量表A式、人格类型与障碍量表以及关系量表问卷，从99名学生中收集了数据。结果表明，个体人格类型在以下方面解释了催眠感受性中相当大比例的变异：（a）整个样本；（b）安全型依恋个体；（c）不安全型依恋个体。在整个样本和安全型依恋个体中，高催眠感受性者都具有无私/自我牺牲的人格类型，这是催眠感受性的主要预测因素，并且在迷人/表演型和乐观/狂喜型人格类型上得分较高。此外，在高催眠感受性者中识别出了两组主要根据依恋风格不同的人群：一组由安全型依恋、迷人/表演型和乐观/狂喜型的人组成，社会认知理论能最好地描述他们。另一组由不安全型依恋的直觉/分裂型人格的人组成，解离理论能更好地描绘他们。
