Gokce Mehmet Ilker, Ozden Eriz, Suer Evren, Gulpinar Basak, Gulpınar Omer, Tangal Semih
Department of Urology, Ankara University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.
Department of Urology, Ufuk University School of Medicine, Ankara,Turkey.
Int Braz J Urol. 2015 Jan-Feb;41(1):86-90. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2015.01.12.
Achieving stone free status (SFS) is the goal of stone surgery. In this study it is aimed to compare effectiveness of unenhanced helical computerized tomography (UHCT), KUB and ultrasonography (US) for detection of residual RFs and predicition of stone releated events following percutaneous nephrolitotomy (PNL).
Patients underwent PNL for radiopaque stones between November 2007 and February 2010 were followed. Patients were examined within 24-48 hours after the procedure by KUB, US and UHCT. For stone size 4 mm was accepted as cut off level of significance.Sensitivity and specificity of KUB and US for detection of RFs and value of them for prediction of stone related events were calculated.
SFS was achieved in 95 patients (54.9%) and when cut off value of 4 mm for RFs was employed, SFS was achieved in 131 patients (75.7%). Sensitivity was 70.5% for KUB, and 52.5% for US. UHCT was shown to be significantly more efficient for detection of RFs compared to both KUB (p=0.01) and US (p=0.001). When cut off level of 4 mm employed, sensitivity of KUB and US increased to 85.7% and 57.1%. Statistical significant superiority of UHCT still remained (p value vs. KUB: 0.03 and p value vs. US: 0.008).
UHCT is the most sensitive diagnostic tool for detecting RFs after PNL. It has higher sensitivity regardless of stone size compared to KUB and US. Additionally UHCT has higher capability of predicting occurrence of stone related events.
实现无结石状态(SFS)是结石手术的目标。本研究旨在比较非增强螺旋计算机断层扫描(UHCT)、腹部平片(KUB)和超声检查(US)在经皮肾镜取石术(PNL)后检测残留结石碎片(RFs)及预测结石相关事件的有效性。
对2007年11月至2010年2月期间因不透射线结石接受PNL的患者进行随访。术后24 - 48小时内,对患者进行KUB、US和UHCT检查。结石大小以4毫米作为有统计学意义的截断值。计算KUB和US检测RFs的敏感性和特异性以及它们预测结石相关事件的价值。
95例患者(54.9%)实现了SFS,当采用4毫米作为RFs的截断值时,131例患者(75.7%)实现了SFS。KUB的敏感性为70.5%,US的敏感性为52.5%。与KUB(p = 0.01)和US(p = 0.001)相比,UHCT在检测RFs方面显示出显著更高的效率。当采用4毫米的截断值时,KUB和US的敏感性分别提高到85.7%和57.1%。UHCT在统计学上仍具有显著优势(与KUB比较的p值:0.03,与US比较的p值:0.008)。
UHCT是PNL后检测RFs最敏感的诊断工具。与KUB和US相比,无论结石大小,它都具有更高的敏感性。此外,UHCT在预测结石相关事件发生方面具有更高的能力。