Suppr超能文献

门诊环境下进行的外周血管手术的安全性和有效性。

The safety and efficacy of peripheral vascular procedures performed in the outpatient setting.

作者信息

Mesbah Oskui Peyman, Kloner Robert A, Burstein Steven, Zhiroff Katrine, Kartub Benjamin Richard, Economides Christina, Brook Jenny, Mayeda Guy S

机构信息

California CardioVascular Institute, 1100 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 101, Los Angeles, CA 90017 USA.

出版信息

J Invasive Cardiol. 2015 May;27(5):243-9.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to evaluate the safety and efficacy of peripheral vascular interventions performed in a private, outpatient catheterization laboratory.

BACKGROUND

Peripheral vascular interventions have been traditionally performed in the inpatient setting. However, there has been a recent shift away from hospital-based vascular interventions toward outpatient-based procedures. Data are scarce on the efficacy and safety of such procedures being performed in the outpatient setting.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective chart review of the first 500 consecutive procedures that were performed at an outpatient catheterization laboratory from February 2012 through February 2013. We separated the procedures into arteriovenous fistula (AVF)-related procedures, peripheral arterial disease (PAD)-related procedures, and miscellaneous procedures. The primary endpoint was procedure success rate, defined as postintervention residual stenosis of <30% on angiography. The secondary endpoint was procedure-related adverse events.

RESULTS

The success rate for AVF-related interventions was 90%, and 93% when including partially successful interventions. The success rate for PAD-related interventions was 82%, and 92% when including partially successful interventions. The procedure success rate for miscellaneous interventions was 89%. Five AVF-related procedures suffered an adverse event (1.49%). Two PAD-related procedures suffered an adverse event (1.3%), while no adverse events were noted among miscellaneous procedures. One patient required immediate postprocedure hospitalization due to iliac artery perforation.

CONCLUSION

Peripheral vascular procedures performed in the outpatient setting are safe and effective. A comparison of outcomes between outpatient and inpatient facilities when performing similar peripheral vascular interventions is needed in order to determine whether a transition of further vascular procedures into an outpatient setting is justified.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估在私立门诊导管实验室进行外周血管介入治疗的安全性和有效性。

背景

外周血管介入治疗传统上是在住院环境中进行的。然而,最近已从基于医院的血管介入治疗转向基于门诊的手术。关于在门诊环境中进行此类手术的有效性和安全性的数据很少。

方法

我们对2012年2月至2013年2月在门诊导管实验室进行的前500例连续手术进行了回顾性图表审查。我们将手术分为动静脉瘘(AVF)相关手术、外周动脉疾病(PAD)相关手术和其他手术。主要终点是手术成功率,定义为血管造影术后残余狭窄<30%。次要终点是与手术相关的不良事件。

结果

AVF相关干预的成功率为90%,包括部分成功的干预时为93%。PAD相关干预的成功率为82%,包括部分成功的干预时为92%。其他干预的手术成功率为89%。5例AVF相关手术发生不良事件(1.49%)。2例PAD相关手术发生不良事件(1.3%),而其他手术未发现不良事件。1例患者因髂动脉穿孔术后需要立即住院。

结论

在门诊环境中进行的外周血管手术是安全有效的。需要比较门诊和住院设施在进行类似外周血管介入治疗时的结果,以确定进一步将血管手术过渡到门诊环境是否合理。

相似文献

4
Transpedal approach for iliac artery stenting: A pilot study.经足背动脉途径行髂动脉支架置入术:一项初步研究。
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2016 Dec;17(8):556-559. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2016.09.004. Epub 2016 Sep 18.

本文引用的文献

3
Future of vascular surgery is in the office.血管外科的未来在办公室。
J Vasc Surg. 2010 Feb;51(2):509-13; discussion 513-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2009.09.056.
5
Safety of outpatient peripheral angioplasty.门诊外周血管成形术的安全性。
Radiology. 1993 Oct;189(1):193-6. doi: 10.1148/radiology.189.1.8372192.
7
Outpatient transluminal angioplasty.门诊经皮腔内血管成形术。
Radiology. 1983 Apr;147(1):7-8. doi: 10.1148/radiology.147.1.6219428.
9
Outpatient angioplasty.门诊血管成形术。
Radiology. 1990 Mar;174(3 Pt 1):753-5. doi: 10.1148/radiology.174.3.2137634.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验