• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医院如何应对价格变化?来自挪威的证据。

How do Hospitals Respond to Price Changes? Evidence from Norway.

作者信息

Januleviciute Jurgita, Askildsen Jan Erik, Kaarboe Oddvar, Siciliani Luigi, Sutton Matt

机构信息

Health Economics Bergen, Bergen, Norway.

Department of Economics, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.

出版信息

Health Econ. 2016 May;25(5):620-36. doi: 10.1002/hec.3179. Epub 2015 Apr 30.

DOI:10.1002/hec.3179
PMID:25929559
Abstract

Many publicly funded health systems use activity-based financing to increase hospital production and efficiency. The aim of this study is to investigate whether price changes for different treatments affect the number of patients treated and the mix of activity provided by hospitals. We exploit the variations in prices created by the changes in the national average treatment cost per diagnosis-related group (DRG) offered to Norwegian hospitals over a period of 5 years (2003-2007). We use the data from Norwegian Patient Register, containing individual-level information on age, gender, type of treatment, diagnosis, number of co-morbidities and the national average treatment costs per DRG. We employ fixed-effect models to examine the changes in the number of patients treated within the DRGs over time. The results suggest that a 10% increase in price leads to about 0.8-1.3% increase in the number of patients treated for DRGs, which are medical (for both emergency and elective patients). In contrast, we find no price effect for DRGs that are surgical (for both emergency and elective patients). Moreover, we find evidence of upcoding. A 10% increase in the ratio of prices between patients with and without complications increases the proportion of patients coded with complications by 0.3-0.4 percentage points.

摘要

许多公共资助的医疗系统采用基于活动的融资方式来提高医院的产出和效率。本研究的目的是调查不同治疗价格的变化是否会影响治疗的患者数量以及医院提供的服务组合。我们利用了挪威医院在5年期间(2003 - 2007年)每个诊断相关组(DRG)的全国平均治疗成本变化所产生的价格差异。我们使用了挪威患者登记处的数据,其中包含有关年龄、性别、治疗类型、诊断、合并症数量以及每个DRG的全国平均治疗成本的个体层面信息。我们采用固定效应模型来研究随着时间推移DRG内治疗患者数量的变化。结果表明,价格上涨10%会导致医疗类DRG(包括急诊和择期患者)的治疗患者数量增加约0.8 - 1.3%。相比之下,我们发现外科类DRG(包括急诊和择期患者)不存在价格效应。此外,我们发现了编码升级的证据。有并发症和无并发症患者之间的价格比上涨10%会使编码有并发症的患者比例提高0.3 - 0.4个百分点。

相似文献

1
How do Hospitals Respond to Price Changes? Evidence from Norway.医院如何应对价格变化?来自挪威的证据。
Health Econ. 2016 May;25(5):620-36. doi: 10.1002/hec.3179. Epub 2015 Apr 30.
2
Do diagnosis-related group-based payments incentivise hospitals to adjust output mix?基于诊断相关分组的支付方式是否会激励医院调整产出组合?
Health Econ. 2015 Apr;24(4):454-69. doi: 10.1002/hec.3033. Epub 2014 Feb 12.
3
Price Changes in Regulated Healthcare Markets: Do Public Hospitals Respond and How?受监管医疗市场中的价格变化:公立医院会做出何种反应以及如何反应?
Health Econ. 2017 Nov;26(11):1429-1446. doi: 10.1002/hec.3435. Epub 2016 Oct 27.
4
Medicare program; changes to the hospital inpatient prospective payment systems and fiscal year 2007 rates; fiscal year 2007 occupational mix adjustment to wage index; health care infrastructure improvement program; selection criteria of loan program for qualifying hospitals engaged in cancer-related health care and forgiveness of indebtedness; and exclusion of vendor purchases made under the competitive acquisition program (CAP) for outpatient drugs and biologicals under part B for the purpose of calculating the average sales price (ASP). Final rules and interim final rule with comment period.医疗保险计划;医院 inpatient 预期支付系统及 2007 财年费率的变更;2007 财年工资指数的职业构成调整;医疗保健基础设施改善计划;参与癌症相关医疗保健的合格医院贷款计划的选择标准及债务免除;以及在计算平均销售价格(ASP)时排除根据 B 部分门诊药品和生物制品的竞争性采购计划(CAP)进行的供应商采购。最终规则及有意见征求期的暂行最终规则。
Fed Regist. 2006 Aug 18;71(160):47869-8351.
5
How do hospitals respond to price changes in emergency departments?医院如何应对急诊科价格变化?
Health Econ. 2019 Jul;28(7):830-842. doi: 10.1002/hec.3890.
6
The distributional implications of using relative prices in DRG payment systems.疾病诊断相关分组(DRG)支付系统中使用相对价格的分配影响。
Inquiry. 1987 Spring;24(1):85-95.
7
Did hospitals respond to changes in weights of Diagnosis Related Groups in Norway between 2006 and 2013?2006年至2013年间,挪威医院对诊断相关组权重的变化做出回应了吗?
Health Policy. 2016 Sep;120(9):992-1000. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2016.07.013. Epub 2016 Aug 11.
8
Variation in patient routine costliness in U.S. psychiatric facilities.美国精神病治疗机构中患者常规费用的差异。
J Ment Health Policy Econ. 2005 Mar;8(1):15-28.
9
How Do Hospitals Respond to Price Changes?医院如何应对价格变化?
Am Econ Rev. 2005 Dec;95(5):1525-47. doi: 10.1257/000282805775014236.
10
Trauma case mix and hospital payment: the potential for refining DRGs.创伤病例组合与医院支付:完善诊断相关分组的潜力。
Health Serv Res. 1991 Apr;26(1):5-26.

引用本文的文献

1
Cost Shifting in Lung Cancer Inpatient Care Under Diagnosis-Intervention Packet Reform: A Pilot Study in China.诊断-干预包改革下肺癌住院治疗中的成本转移:中国的一项试点研究
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2025 Mar 5;18:759-773. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S498634. eCollection 2025.
2
How significant is cost-shifting behavior under the diagnosis intervention packet payment reform? Evidence from the coronary heart disease market.在诊断干预打包付费改革下,成本转移行为的影响程度如何?来自冠心病市场的证据。
Front Public Health. 2024 Nov 20;12:1431991. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1431991. eCollection 2024.
3
Impact of health benefit package policy interventions on service utilisation under government-funded health insurance in Punjab, India: analysis of (PM-JAY).
印度旁遮普邦政府资助的医疗保险下健康福利包政策干预对服务利用的影响:(总理- Jan Arogya Yojana,PM-JAY)分析
Lancet Reg Health Southeast Asia. 2024 Aug 19;28:100462. doi: 10.1016/j.lansea.2024.100462. eCollection 2024 Sep.
4
Older high-cost patients in Norwegian somatic hospitals: a register-based study of patient characteristics.挪威实体医院的高龄高费用患者:基于患者特征的登记研究。
BMJ Open. 2023 Oct 4;13(10):e074411. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-074411.
5
Related variations: A novel approach for detecting patterns of regional variations in healthcare utilisation rates.相关变体:一种用于检测医疗利用率区域变化模式的新方法。
PLoS One. 2023 Jun 22;18(6):e0287306. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0287306. eCollection 2023.
6
Do budget constraints limit access to health care? Evidence from PCI treatments in Hungary.预算限制是否会影响医疗保健的可及性?来自匈牙利 PCI 治疗的证据。
Int J Health Econ Manag. 2023 Jun;23(2):281-302. doi: 10.1007/s10754-023-09349-w. Epub 2023 Apr 19.
7
A comparison of four quasi-experimental methods: an analysis of the introduction of activity-based funding in Ireland.四种准实验方法的比较:基于活动的资金投入在爱尔兰的引入分析。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Nov 3;22(1):1311. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08657-0.
8
It probably worked: a Bayesian approach to evaluating the introduction of activity-based hospital payment in Israel.这可能奏效了:基于贝叶斯方法评估以色列实行基于活动的医院支付制度。
Isr J Health Policy Res. 2022 Feb 15;11(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s13584-022-00515-y.
9
Predicting diagnostic coding in hospitals: individual level effects of price incentives.预测医院的诊断编码:价格激励的个体水平效应。
Int J Health Econ Manag. 2022 Jun;22(2):129-146. doi: 10.1007/s10754-021-09314-5. Epub 2021 Oct 6.
10
Performance Comparison of Public Hospitals Between 2014 and 2018 in Different Regions of Guangdong Province, China, Following 2017 Medical Service Price Reforms.2017 年医疗服务价格改革后,中国广东省不同地区公立医院 2014 年至 2018 年的绩效比较。
Front Public Health. 2021 Jun 30;9:701201. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.701201. eCollection 2021.