Institute for Economic and Innovation Research, JOANNEUM RESEARCH Forschungsgesellschaft mbH, Leonhardstraße 59, 8010 Graz, Austria.
Institute for Water, Energy and Sustainability, JOANNEUM RESEARCH Forschungsgesellschaft mbH, Elisabethstraße 18/II, 8010 Graz, Austria.
Sci Total Environ. 2016 Feb 1;543(Pt B):1010-8. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.04.035. Epub 2015 Apr 27.
We extend the concept of 'Weather Value at Risk' - initially introduced to measure the economic risks resulting from current weather fluctuations - to describe and compare sectoral income risks from climate change. This is illustrated using the examples of wheat cultivation and summer tourism in (parts of) Sardinia. Based on climate scenario data from four different regional climate models we study the change in the risk of weather-related income losses between some reference (1971-2000) and some future (2041-2070) period. Results from both examples suggest an increase in weather-related risks of income losses due to climate change, which is somewhat more pronounced for summer tourism. Nevertheless, income from wheat cultivation is at much higher risk of weather-related losses than income from summer tourism, both under reference and future climatic conditions. A weather-induced loss of at least 5% - compared to the income associated with average reference weather conditions - shows a 40% (80%) probability of occurrence in the case of wheat cultivation, but only a 0.4% (16%) probability of occurrence in the case of summer tourism, given reference (future) climatic conditions. Whereas in the agricultural example increases in the weather-related income risks mainly result from an overall decrease in average wheat yields, the heightened risk in the tourism example stems mostly from a change in the weather-induced variability of tourism incomes. With the extended 'Weather Value at Risk' concept being able to capture both, impacts from changes in the mean and the variability of the climate, it is a powerful tool for presenting and disseminating the results of climate change impact assessments. Due to its flexibility, the concept can be applied to any economic sector and therefore provides a valuable tool for cross-sectoral comparisons of climate change impacts, but also for the assessment of the costs and benefits of adaptation measures.
我们将“天气风险价值”的概念加以延伸——该概念最初被引入以衡量当前天气波动所导致的经济风险——以描述和比较气候变化对各部门收入风险的影响。这可通过在撒丁岛(部分地区)的小麦种植和夏季旅游这两个例子来说明。我们利用来自四个不同区域气候模型的气候情景数据,研究了在一些参考(1971-2000 年)和一些未来(2041-2070 年)时期,与天气相关的收入损失风险的变化。两个例子的结果都表明,由于气候变化,与天气相关的收入损失风险增加,而夏季旅游的这种风险增加更为明显。然而,无论是在参考还是未来的气候条件下,小麦种植的收入受到与天气相关的损失的风险都远高于夏季旅游的收入。与平均参考天气条件相关的收入相比,至少有 5%的天气引起的损失表明,在小麦种植的情况下,发生概率为 40%(80%),而在夏季旅游的情况下,发生概率仅为 0.4%(16%),假设参考(未来)气候条件。在农业例子中,与天气相关的收入风险增加主要是由于平均小麦产量的总体下降,而在旅游例子中,风险增加主要是由于旅游收入的天气引起的可变性变化。由于扩展的“天气风险价值”概念能够同时捕捉气候均值和变异性变化的影响,因此它是呈现和传播气候变化影响评估结果的有力工具。由于其灵活性,该概念可应用于任何经济部门,因此为跨部门比较气候变化影响提供了有价值的工具,也为评估适应措施的成本和效益提供了有价值的工具。