Suppr超能文献

转介至协作护理或专科护理的患者的五年心理健康护理使用情况。

Five-Year Mental Health Care Use by Patients Referred to Collaborative Care or to Specialized Care.

作者信息

van Orden Mirjam L, Deen Mathijs L, Spinhoven Philip, Haffmans Judith, Hoencamp Eric

机构信息

Ms. van Orden and Mr. Deen are with Parnassia Academie, Dr. Hoencamp is with the Indigo Zorgservice, and Dr. Haffmans is with PsyQ, Medical Chronobiology, all at the Parnassia Groep, The Hague, the Netherlands (e-mail:

出版信息

Psychiatr Serv. 2015 Aug 1;66(8):840-4. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201400238. Epub 2015 May 1.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study compared long-term use of mental health care by two groups of patients who had common mental disorders in the Netherlands-those treated in a collaborative care setting and those referred to off-site specialized mental health services if indicated.

METHODS

The study was a retrospective analysis of use of mental health care over five years by 139 patients who participated in a cluster-randomized parent study. The parent study involved 27 general practitioners (GPs) who provided either collaborative care or usual care. In the collaborative care condition, a mental health professional worked on site at the GP's practice and was available to provide short-term treatment. In the usual-care condition, the GP referred the patient to off-site specialized mental health services if indicated; if not indicated, the GP provided usual care. The two treatment groups were compared on the number of mental health care contacts and total treatment duration, the proportion that initiated a new treatment episode after termination of the initial treatment, and time to new treatment.

RESULTS

Patients in the collaborative care condition received about half the number of mental health care contacts as those in the usual-care condition, and no differences were found in the rate of initiation of new treatment episodes after initial treatment, time to new treatment, and total treatment duration.

CONCLUSIONS

Referral of patients with common mental disorders to collaborative mental health care as a first intervention led to fewer contacts with a mental health care professional over the long term, compared with referral to specialized mental health care.

摘要

目的

本研究比较了荷兰两组患有常见精神障碍的患者长期使用精神卫生保健服务的情况,一组在协作式护理环境中接受治疗,另一组在必要时被转介至外部专门的精神卫生服务机构。

方法

该研究对参与一项整群随机对照母研究的139名患者五年内使用精神卫生保健服务的情况进行了回顾性分析。母研究涉及27名全科医生(GP),他们分别提供协作式护理或常规护理。在协作式护理条件下,一名精神卫生专业人员在全科医生诊所现场工作,可提供短期治疗。在常规护理条件下,全科医生在必要时将患者转介至外部专门的精神卫生服务机构;若无需转介,全科医生则提供常规护理。比较了两个治疗组在精神卫生保健接触次数、总治疗时长、初始治疗结束后开始新治疗疗程的比例以及开始新治疗的时间方面的差异。

结果

协作式护理组患者的精神卫生保健接触次数约为常规护理组患者的一半,在初始治疗后开始新治疗疗程的比例、开始新治疗的时间以及总治疗时长方面未发现差异。

结论

与转介至专门的精神卫生保健机构相比,将患有常见精神障碍的患者作为首要干预措施转介至协作式精神卫生保健机构,长期来看与精神卫生保健专业人员的接触次数更少。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验