• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在同地办公环境下的协作:一项扎根理论研究。

Collaborating in the context of co-location: a grounded theory study.

作者信息

Wener Pamela, Woodgate Roberta L

机构信息

Department of Occupational Therapy, College of Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Manitoba, R125-771 McDermot Ave., Winnipeg, MB, R3E 0T6, Canada.

College of Nursing, University of Manitoba, 465 Helen Glass Centre, 89 Curry Place, Winnipeg, MB, R3T 2N2, Canada.

出版信息

BMC Fam Pract. 2016 Mar 10;17:30. doi: 10.1186/s12875-016-0427-x.

DOI:10.1186/s12875-016-0427-x
PMID:26965307
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4785669/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Most individuals with mental health concerns seek care from their primary care provider, who may lack comfort, knowledge, and time to provide care. Interprofessional collaboration between providers improves access to primary mental health services and increases primary care providers' comfort offering these services. Building and sustaining interprofessional relationships is foundational to collaborative practice in primary care settings. However, little is known about the relationship building process within these collaborative relationships. The purpose of this grounded theory study was to gain a theoretical understanding of the interprofessional collaborative relationship-building process to guide health care providers and leaders as they integrate mental health services into primary care settings.

METHODS

Forty primary and mental health care providers completed a demographic questionnaire and participated in either an individual or group interview. Interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. Transcripts were reviewed several times and then individually coded. Codes were reviewed and similar codes were collapsed to form categories using using constant comparison. All codes and categories were discussed amongst the researchers and the final categories and core category was agreed upon using constant comparison and consensus.

RESULTS

A four-stage developmental interprofessional collaborative relationship-building model explained the emergent core category of Collaboration in the Context of Co-location. The four stages included 1) Looking for Help, 2) Initiating Co-location, 3) Fitting-in, and 4) Growing Reciprocity. A patient-focus and communication strategies were essential processes throughout the interprofessional collaborative relationship-building process.

CONCLUSIONS

Building interprofessional collaborative relationships amongst health care providers are essential to delivering mental health services in primary care settings. This developmental model describes the process of how these relationships are co-created and supported by the health care region. Furthermore, the model emphasizes that all providers must develop and sustain a patient-focus and communication strategies that are flexible. Applying this model, health care providers can guide the creation and sustainability of primary care interprofessional collaborative relationships. Moreover, this model may guide health care leaders and policy makers as they initiate interprofessional collaborative practice in other health care settings.

摘要

背景

大多数有心理健康问题的人会向其初级保健提供者寻求护理,而这些提供者可能缺乏提供护理的舒适度、知识和时间。提供者之间的跨专业协作可改善初级心理健康服务的可及性,并提高初级保健提供者提供这些服务的舒适度。建立和维持跨专业关系是初级保健环境中协作实践的基础。然而,对于这些协作关系中的关系建立过程知之甚少。这项扎根理论研究的目的是从理论上理解跨专业协作关系的建立过程,以指导医疗保健提供者和领导者将心理健康服务整合到初级保健环境中。

方法

40名初级保健和心理健康保健提供者完成了一份人口统计学调查问卷,并参加了个人或小组访谈。访谈进行了录音并逐字转录。转录本被多次审查,然后进行单独编码。对编码进行审查,并使用持续比较法将相似的编码合并形成类别。所有编码和类别在研究人员之间进行了讨论,并通过持续比较和达成共识确定了最终类别和核心类别。

结果

一个四阶段的跨专业协作关系发展模型解释了在同地办公背景下出现的核心类别“协作”。这四个阶段包括:1)寻求帮助;2)启动同地办公;3)融入;4)增强互惠。以患者为中心和沟通策略是跨专业协作关系建立过程中的关键环节。

结论

在医疗保健提供者之间建立跨专业协作关系对于在初级保健环境中提供心理健康服务至关重要。这个发展模型描述了这些关系如何由医疗保健区域共同创建和支持的过程。此外,该模型强调所有提供者必须发展并维持以患者为中心且灵活的沟通策略。应用此模型,医疗保健提供者可以指导初级保健跨专业协作关系的创建和可持续性。此外,该模型可以指导医疗保健领导者和政策制定者在其他医疗保健环境中开展跨专业协作实践。

相似文献

1
Collaborating in the context of co-location: a grounded theory study.在同地办公环境下的协作:一项扎根理论研究。
BMC Fam Pract. 2016 Mar 10;17:30. doi: 10.1186/s12875-016-0427-x.
2
Patients' experiences of and roles in interprofessional collaborative practice in primary care: a constructivist grounded theory study.患者在初级保健中的跨专业协作实践中的体验和角色:建构主义扎根理论研究。
Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2024 May 9;25:e24. doi: 10.1017/S1463423624000148.
3
Measuring the performance of interprofessional primary health care teams: understanding the teams perspective.衡量跨专业基层医疗团队的绩效:了解团队的观点。
Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2019 Aug 28;20:e125. doi: 10.1017/S1463423619000409.
4
Interprofessional collaborative team development in china: A grounded theory study.中国跨专业协作团队的发展:扎根理论研究。
J Nurs Manag. 2019 Sep;27(6):1075-1083. doi: 10.1111/jonm.12775. Epub 2019 May 27.
5
Interprofessional Collaborative Relationship-Building Model in Action in Primary Care: A Secondary Analysis.基层医疗中跨专业协作关系建立模型的实际应用:二次分析
Front Rehabil Sci. 2022 May 31;3:890001. doi: 10.3389/fresc.2022.890001. eCollection 2022.
6
Interprofessional mental health training in rural primary care: findings from a mixed methods study.农村基层医疗中的跨专业心理健康培训:一项混合方法研究的结果
J Interprof Care. 2015 May;29(3):195-201. doi: 10.3109/13561820.2014.966808. Epub 2014 Oct 7.
7
Incentives and disincentives for treating of depression and anxiety in Ontario Family Health Teams: protocol for a grounded theory study.安大略省家庭健康团队治疗抑郁症和焦虑症的激励因素与抑制因素:扎根理论研究方案
BMJ Open. 2016 Nov 14;6(11):e014623. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014623.
8
Exploring challenges in the patient's discharge process from the internal medicine service: A qualitative study of patients' and providers' perceptions.探索内科服务中患者出院流程的挑战:一项关于患者和医护人员看法的定性研究
J Interprof Care. 2017 Sep;31(5):566-574. doi: 10.1080/13561820.2017.1322562. Epub 2017 Jul 7.
9
Patient advocates' views of patient roles in interprofessional collaborative practice in primary care: A constructivist grounded theory study.患者倡导人士对初级保健中医患协作实践中患者角色的看法:一项建构主义扎根理论研究。
Health Soc Care Community. 2022 Nov;30(6):e5775-e5785. doi: 10.1111/hsc.14009. Epub 2022 Sep 22.
10
The experiences of midwives and nurses collaborating to provide birthing care: a systematic review.助产士与护士合作提供分娩护理的经验:一项系统综述。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Nov;13(11):74-127. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2444.

引用本文的文献

1
Development of client-centredness: Perceptions of interprofessional health care students.以客户为中心的发展:跨专业医护学生的看法。
Can J Dent Hyg. 2025 Feb 1;59(1):36-44. eCollection 2025 Feb.
2
Foundations of Interprofessional Education in Dental Schools: A Narrative Review.牙科学院跨专业教育基础:一项叙述性综述
Eur J Dent. 2025 Jul;19(3):587-594. doi: 10.1055/s-0045-1804504. Epub 2025 Mar 12.
3
Evolving through multiple, co-existing pressures to change: a case study of self-organization in primary care during the COVID-19 pandemic in Canada.

本文引用的文献

1
Five-Year Mental Health Care Use by Patients Referred to Collaborative Care or to Specialized Care.转介至协作护理或专科护理的患者的五年心理健康护理使用情况。
Psychiatr Serv. 2015 Aug 1;66(8):840-4. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201400238. Epub 2015 May 1.
2
Predictors of primary care management of depression in the Veterans Affairs healthcare system.退伍军人事务医疗系统中抑郁症初级护理管理的预测因素。
J Gen Intern Med. 2014 Jul;29(7):1017-25. doi: 10.1007/s11606-014-2807-z. Epub 2014 Feb 25.
3
Better together? a naturalistic qualitative study of inter-professional working in collaborative care for co-morbid depression and physical health problems.
在多种共存压力下不断演变以实现变革:加拿大 COVID-19 大流行期间初级保健中自组织的案例研究。
BMC Prim Care. 2024 Aug 5;25(1):285. doi: 10.1186/s12875-024-02520-3.
4
Primary care occupational, physical, and respiratory therapy role adaptation in the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic.初级保健职业、物理和呼吸治疗在 COVID-19 大流行的第一年的角色适应。
BMC Prim Care. 2024 Jan 2;25(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s12875-023-02247-7.
5
How co-locating public mental health interventions in community settings impacts mental health and health inequalities: a multi-site realist evaluation.社区环境中公共心理健康干预措施的共同定位如何影响心理健康和健康不平等:一项多地点现实评估。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Dec 7;23(1):2445. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-17404-x.
6
Healthcare workers' perceptions and experiences of primary healthcare integration: a scoping review of qualitative evidence.医护人员对初级医疗一体化的认知和体验:定性证据的范围综述。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Jul 19;7(7):CD013603. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013603.pub3.
7
Healthcare workers' perceptions and experiences of primary healthcare integration: a scoping review of qualitative evidence.卫生保健工作者对初级卫生保健整合的看法和经验:定性证据的范围综述。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Jul 11;7(7):CD013603. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013603.pub2.
8
Scoping review to identify strategies and interventions improving interprofessional collaboration and integration in primary care.范围综述,旨在确定改善初级保健中医护协作和整合的策略和干预措施。
BMJ Open. 2022 Oct 27;12(10):e062111. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062111.
9
Interprofessional Collaborative Relationship-Building Model in Action in Primary Care: A Secondary Analysis.基层医疗中跨专业协作关系建立模型的实际应用:二次分析
Front Rehabil Sci. 2022 May 31;3:890001. doi: 10.3389/fresc.2022.890001. eCollection 2022.
10
Preparing Graduates for Interprofessional Practice in South Africa: The Dissonance Between Learning and Practice.为南非的跨专业实践培养毕业生:学习与实践之间的不和谐。
Front Public Health. 2021 Feb 12;9:594894. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.594894. eCollection 2021.
更好地合作?一项关于共病抑郁和身体健康问题协作护理中跨专业工作的自然主义定性研究。
Implement Sci. 2013 Sep 20;8:110. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-8-110.
4
Use of a qualitative methodological scaffolding process to design robust interprofessional studies.运用定性方法学支架过程设计稳健的跨专业研究。
J Interprof Care. 2013 Jul;27(4):305-12. doi: 10.3109/13561820.2013.763775. Epub 2013 Feb 11.
5
Grounded theory of barriers and facilitators to mandated implementation of mental health care in the primary care setting.基层医疗环境中强制实施精神卫生保健的障碍与促进因素的扎根理论
Depress Res Treat. 2012;2012:597157. doi: 10.1155/2012/597157. Epub 2012 Jul 29.
6
Comparative effectiveness of collaborative chronic care models for mental health conditions across primary, specialty, and behavioral health care settings: systematic review and meta-analysis.协作式慢性病管理模式在初级保健、专科保健和行为保健环境下治疗心理健康状况的效果比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Am J Psychiatry. 2012 Aug;169(8):790-804. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2012.11111616.
7
General practitioners' management of mental disorders: a rewarding practice with considerable obstacles.全科医生对精神障碍的管理:一项富有成效但困难重重的实践。
BMC Fam Pract. 2012 Mar 16;13:19. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-13-19.
8
Wait time impact of co-located primary care mental health services: the effect of adding collaborative care in northern Ontario.共同定位的初级保健心理健康服务的等待时间影响:在安大略省北部添加协作护理的效果。
Can J Psychiatry. 2012 Jan;57(1):29-33. doi: 10.1177/070674371205700106.
9
Integrating mental health services within primary care settings: the Hamilton Family Health Team.将心理健康服务整合到初级保健机构中:汉密尔顿家庭健康团队。
J Ambul Care Manage. 2011 Apr-Jun;34(2):174-82. doi: 10.1097/JAC.0b013e31820f6435.
10
Conflict on interprofessional primary health care teams--can it be resolved?跨专业基层医疗团队的冲突——能解决吗?
J Interprof Care. 2011 Jan;25(1):4-10. doi: 10.3109/13561820.2010.497750. Epub 2010 Aug 26.