Women's College Hospital and University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
University of Manitoba and Concordia Joint Replacement Group, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015 Jul;67(7):1806-15. doi: 10.1002/art.39124.
As rates of total joint arthroplasty (TJA) for osteoarthritis (OA) rise, there is a need to ensure appropriate use. We undertook this study to develop criteria for appropriate use of TJA.
In prior work, we used qualitative methods to separately assess OA patients' and arthroplasty surgeons' perceptions regarding appropriateness of patient candidates for TJA. The current study reviewed the appropriateness themes that emerged from each group, and a series of statements were developed to reflect each unique theme or criterion. A group of arthroplasty surgeons then indicated their level of agreement with each statement using electronic voting. Where ≤70% agreed or disagreed, the criterion was discussed and revised, and revoting occurred. In standardized telephone interviews, OA patient focus group participants indicated their level of agreement with each revised criterion.
Qualitative research in 58 OA patients and 14 arthroplasty surgeons identified 11 appropriateness criteria. Member-checking in 15 surgeons (including 5 who had participated in the qualitative study) resulted in agreement on 6 revised criteria. These included evidence of arthritis on joint examination, patient-reported symptoms negatively impacting quality of life, an adequate trial of appropriate nonsurgical treatment, realistic patient expectations of surgery, mental and physical readiness of patient for surgery, and patient-surgeon agreement that potential benefits exceed risks. Thirty-six of the original 58 OA patient focus group participants (62.1%) participated in the member-check interviews and endorsed all 6 criteria.
Patients and surgeons jointly endorsed 6 criteria for assessment of TJA appropriateness in OA patients. Prospective validation of these criteria (assessed preoperatively) as predictive of postoperative patient-reported outcomes is under way and will inform development of a surgeon-patient decision-support tool for assessment of TJA appropriateness.
随着全关节置换术(TJA)治疗骨关节炎(OA)的比例上升,需要确保其合理应用。我们开展此项研究,旨在制定 TJA 合理应用的标准。
既往研究中,我们采用定性方法分别评估了 OA 患者和关节置换外科医生对 TJA 患者候选人适宜性的看法。本研究回顾了每组出现的适宜性主题,并制定了一系列陈述来反映每个独特的主题或标准。一组关节置换外科医生随后通过电子投票对每个陈述表示同意或不同意的程度。如果≤70%的人表示同意或不同意,则对标准进行讨论和修订,并重新投票。在标准化的电话访谈中,OA 患者焦点小组参与者表示对每个修订标准的同意程度。
58 例 OA 患者和 14 例关节置换外科医生的定性研究确定了 11 个适宜性标准。15 名外科医生(包括 5 名参与定性研究的外科医生)进行的成员检查达成了 6 项修订标准的一致意见。这些标准包括关节检查有骨关节炎的证据、患者报告的症状对生活质量有负面影响、适当的非手术治疗试验、患者对手术的现实期望、患者身心准备接受手术以及患者和外科医生一致认为潜在获益超过风险。最初的 58 例 OA 患者焦点小组参与者中有 36 名(62.1%)参加了成员检查访谈,他们均认可所有 6 项标准。
患者和外科医生共同认可了 6 项评估 OA 患者 TJA 适宜性的标准。正在对这些标准(术前评估)进行前瞻性验证,以评估其是否可预测术后患者报告的结局,并为 TJA 适宜性评估制定外科医生-患者决策支持工具提供信息。