• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于评估韩国老年人健康状况的SF-36量表的拉施分析验证

Rasch validation of the SF-36 for assessing the health status of Korean older adults.

作者信息

Kim Sae-Hyung, So Wi-Young

机构信息

Department of Measurement and Evaluation of Physical Education, Chungbuk National University, Republic of Korea.

Sports and Health Care Major, College of Humanities and Arts, Korea National University of Transportation, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

J Phys Ther Sci. 2015 Mar;27(3):601-6. doi: 10.1589/jpts.27.601. Epub 2015 Mar 31.

DOI:10.1589/jpts.27.601
PMID:25931689
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4395673/
Abstract

[Purpose] To verify, using Rasch analysis, the applicability of the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) to elderly Koreans, as this instrument would be useful for determining elderly individuals' overall performance and providing them with health information. [Subjects and Methods] The SF-36 was administered to a sample of 510 individuals aged over 60 living in the Seoul and Gyeonggi areas of South Korea. When testing for goodness-of-fit, we considered items with infit and outfit indexes of over 1.30 or less than 0.70 to be incongruent. SF-36 factors that contained over three items, including physical functioning, role limitations (physical and emotional), mental health, vitality, and general health, were analyzed. Each factor was examined through step calibration of the response categories in the probability curve. [Results] The response categories were found to be appropriate because the adjustment values of each factor increased. We found five items in physical functioning, two items in role limitation-emotion, one item in mental health, and one item in general health to be incongruent; all items in the role limitation-physical and vitality factors were congruent. [Conclusion] We conclude that the SF-36 could be revised to more accurately measure the health status of elderly Koreans.

摘要

[目的] 使用Rasch分析验证36项简短健康调查量表(SF - 36)对韩国老年人的适用性,因为该工具对于确定老年人的整体健康状况并为他们提供健康信息很有用。[对象与方法] 对居住在韩国首尔和京畿道地区的510名60岁以上的个体进行了SF - 36问卷调查。在进行拟合优度检验时,我们将内拟合指数和外拟合指数大于1.30或小于0.70的项目视为不一致。对包含身体功能、角色限制(身体和情感方面)、心理健康、活力和总体健康等三个以上项目的SF - 36因子进行了分析。通过概率曲线中响应类别的逐步校准对每个因子进行了检验。[结果] 由于每个因子的调整值增加,发现响应类别是合适的。我们发现身体功能中有5个项目、角色限制 - 情感中有2个项目、心理健康中有1个项目以及总体健康中有1个项目不一致;角色限制 - 身体和活力因子中的所有项目都是一致的。[结论] 我们得出结论,SF - 36可以进行修订,以更准确地测量韩国老年人的健康状况。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0a37/4395673/4b7dcd428bd1/jpts-27-601-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0a37/4395673/3c27f3e259a4/jpts-27-601-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0a37/4395673/c8bed10ba353/jpts-27-601-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0a37/4395673/bd9cb700b786/jpts-27-601-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0a37/4395673/1d07b27cc6d1/jpts-27-601-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0a37/4395673/b789a2564e1c/jpts-27-601-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0a37/4395673/4b7dcd428bd1/jpts-27-601-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0a37/4395673/3c27f3e259a4/jpts-27-601-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0a37/4395673/c8bed10ba353/jpts-27-601-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0a37/4395673/bd9cb700b786/jpts-27-601-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0a37/4395673/1d07b27cc6d1/jpts-27-601-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0a37/4395673/b789a2564e1c/jpts-27-601-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0a37/4395673/4b7dcd428bd1/jpts-27-601-g006.jpg

相似文献

1
Rasch validation of the SF-36 for assessing the health status of Korean older adults.用于评估韩国老年人健康状况的SF-36量表的拉施分析验证
J Phys Ther Sci. 2015 Mar;27(3):601-6. doi: 10.1589/jpts.27.601. Epub 2015 Mar 31.
2
The Chinese version of the Perceived Stress Questionnaire: development and validation amongst medical students and workers.中文版的感知压力问卷:医学生和医务人员的编制与验证。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020 Mar 13;18(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s12955-020-01307-1.
3
Measurement characteristics for two health-related quality of life measures in older adults: The SF-36 and the CDC Healthy Days items.老年人两种健康相关生活质量测量工具的测量特征:SF-36量表和美国疾病控制与预防中心健康日条目。
Disabil Health J. 2016 Oct;9(4):567-74. doi: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2016.04.008. Epub 2016 Apr 30.
4
Comparison of 4 functional indexes in psoriatic arthritis with axial or peripheral disease subgroups using Rasch analyses.使用拉施分析比较银屑病关节炎轴向或外周疾病亚组中的4个功能指标。
J Rheumatol. 2008 Aug;35(8):1613-21. Epub 2008 Jul 1.
5
Goodness of fit of the items used in the 2nd cycle of evaluation and accreditation of medical schools by the Korea Institute of Medical Education and Evaluation based on the Rasch model.韩国医学教育与评估院基于拉施模型对医学院校进行第二轮评估与认证时所使用项目的拟合优度。
J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2019;16:28. doi: 10.3352/jeehp.2019.16.28. Epub 2019 Sep 30.
6
Item response theory analyses of physical functioning items in the medical outcomes study.医学结果研究中身体功能项目的项目反应理论分析。
Med Care. 2007 May;45(5 Suppl 1):S32-8. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000246649.43232.82.
7
United States Spanish short-form-36 health survey: scaling assumptions and reliability in elderly community-dwelling Mexican Americans.美国西班牙语简式36健康调查:老年社区居住墨西哥裔美国人的量表假设与信度
Nurs Res. 2003 Jul-Aug;52(4):262-9. doi: 10.1097/00006199-200307000-00009.
8
Assessing items on the SF-8 Japanese version for health-related quality of life: a psychometric analysis based on the nominal categories model of item response theory.评估SF-8日本版中与健康相关生活质量的条目:基于项目反应理论名义类别模型的心理测量分析。
Value Health. 2009 Jun;12(4):568-73. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2008.00449.x. Epub 2008 Sep 9.
9
Generating clinical outputs for self-reports of visual functioning.生成视觉功能自我报告的临床输出。
Optom Vis Sci. 2013 Aug;90(8):765-75. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000000007.
10
Using Rasch analysis to compare the psychometric properties of the Short Form 36 physical function score and the Health Assessment Questionnaire disability index in patients with psoriatic arthritis and rheumatoid arthritis.运用拉施分析比较银屑病关节炎和类风湿关节炎患者的简明健康状况调查量表身体功能评分与健康评估问卷残疾指数的心理测量学特性。
Arthritis Rheum. 2007 Jun 15;57(5):723-9. doi: 10.1002/art.22770.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluating the Longitudinal Item and Category Stability of the SF-36 Full and Summary Scales Using Rasch Analysis.使用 RASCH 分析评估 SF-36 全量表和简明量表的纵向项目和类别稳定性。
Biomed Res Int. 2018 Nov 4;2018:1013453. doi: 10.1155/2018/1013453. eCollection 2018.

本文引用的文献

1
Item set discrimination and the unit in the Rasch model.项目集区分与拉施模型中的单位
J Appl Meas. 2012;13(2):165-80.
2
Is the partial credit model a Rasch model?部分计分模型是一种拉施模型吗?
J Appl Meas. 2012;13(2):114-31.
3
A Rasch model analysis of technology usage in Minnesota hospitals.明尼苏达州医院技术使用的 Rasch 模型分析。
Int J Med Inform. 2012 Aug;81(8):527-38. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2012.01.008. Epub 2012 Feb 22.
4
Comparing holistic and analytic scoring for performance assessment with many-facet Rasch model.运用多面Rasch模型比较整体评分与分析评分在绩效评估中的应用
J Appl Meas. 2001;2(4):379-88.
5
Tests of data quality, scaling assumptions, and reliability of the SF-36 in eleven countries: results from the IQOLA Project. International Quality of Life Assessment.11个国家的数据质量、量表假设及SF-36可靠性测试:国际生活质量评估(IQOLA项目)的结果
J Clin Epidemiol. 1998 Nov;51(11):1149-58. doi: 10.1016/s0895-4356(98)00106-1.
6
Deriving a preference-based single index from the UK SF-36 Health Survey.从英国SF-36健康调查中得出基于偏好的单一指标。
J Clin Epidemiol. 1998 Nov;51(11):1115-28. doi: 10.1016/s0895-4356(98)00103-6.
7
The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection.医学结局研究36项简明健康调查(SF-36)。I.概念框架与条目选择。
Med Care. 1992 Jun;30(6):473-83.