Kropeit D, Johnson M, Cawello W, Rudd G D, Horstmann R
AiCuris GmbH & Co. KG, Wuppertal, Germany.
UCB Pharma, Raleigh, NC, USA.
Acta Neurol Scand. 2015 Nov;132(5):346-54. doi: 10.1111/ane.12416. Epub 2015 Apr 30.
To determine whether lacosamide prolongs the corrected QT interval (QTc).
In this randomized, double-blind, positive- and placebo-controlled, parallel-design trial, healthy volunteers were randomized to lacosamide 400 mg/day (maximum-recommended daily dose, 6 days), lacosamide 800 mg/day (supratherapeutic dose, 6 days), placebo (6 days), or moxifloxacin 400 mg/day (3 days). Variables included maximum time-matched change from baseline in QT interval individually corrected for heart rate ([HR] QTcI), other ECG parameters, pharmacokinetics (PK), and safety/tolerability.
The QTcI mean maximum difference from placebo was -4.3 ms and -6.3 ms for lacosamide 400 and 800 mg/day; upper limits of the 2-sided 90% confidence interval were below the 10 ms non-inferiority margin (-0.5 and -2.5 ms, respectively). Placebo-corrected QTcI for moxifloxacin was +10.4 ms (lower 90% confidence bound >0 [6.6 ms]), which established assay sensitivity for this trial. As lacosamide did not increase QTcI, the trial is considered a negative QTc trial. There was no dose-related or clinically relevant effect on QRS duration. HR increased from baseline by ~5 bpm with lacosamide 800 mg/day versus placebo. Placebo-subtracted mean increases in PR interval at tmax were 7.3 ms (400 mg/day) and 11.9 ms (800 mg/day). There were no findings of second-degree or higher atrioventricular block. Adverse events (AEs) were dose related and most commonly involved the nervous and gastrointestinal systems.
Lacosamide (≤ 800 mg/day) did not prolong the QTc interval. Lacosamide caused a small, dose-related increase in mean PR interval that was not associated with AEs. Cardiac, overall safety, and PK profiles for lacosamide in healthy volunteers were consistent with those observed in patients with partial-onset seizures.
确定拉科酰胺是否会延长校正QT间期(QTc)。
在这项随机、双盲、阳性对照和安慰剂对照的平行设计试验中,健康志愿者被随机分为接受400毫克/天拉科酰胺(最大推荐日剂量,6天)、800毫克/天拉科酰胺(超治疗剂量,6天)、安慰剂(6天)或400毫克/天莫西沙星(3天)治疗。变量包括根据心率单独校正的QT间期相对于基线的最大时间匹配变化([HR]QTcI)、其他心电图参数、药代动力学(PK)以及安全性/耐受性。
400毫克/天和800毫克/天拉科酰胺相对于安慰剂的QTcI平均最大差异分别为-4.3毫秒和-6.3毫秒;双侧90%置信区间的上限低于10毫秒的非劣效性界值(分别为-0.5毫秒和-2.5毫秒)。莫西沙星的安慰剂校正QTcI为+10.4毫秒(90%置信下限>0[6.6毫秒]),这确立了该试验的检测灵敏度。由于拉科酰胺未增加QTcI,该试验被视为QTc阴性试验。对QRS波时限没有剂量相关或临床相关影响。与安慰剂相比,800毫克/天拉科酰胺组心率较基线增加约5次/分钟。在达峰时间,与安慰剂相比,PR间期平均增加量在400毫克/天组为7.3毫秒,在800毫克/天组为11.9毫秒。未发现二度或更高程度的房室传导阻滞。不良事件(AE)与剂量相关,最常见于神经系统和胃肠道系统。
拉科酰胺(≤800毫克/天)不会延长QTc间期。拉科酰胺导致PR间期均值出现与剂量相关的小幅增加,但与不良事件无关。健康志愿者中拉科酰胺的心脏、总体安全性和药代动力学特征与部分性发作患者中观察到的一致。