Bennett Stevie N, Tita Alan, Owen John, Biggio Joseph R, Harper Lorie M
The Maternal-Fetal Medicine Division, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Center for Women's Reproductive Health, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama.
Obstet Gynecol. 2015 May;125(5):1217-1223. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000820.
To assess the validity of White's classification, including the role of chronic hypertension, in a contemporary diabetic population.
We performed a retrospective cohort study of all singleton pregnancies with pre-existing diabetes mellitus from 2008 to 2013. Adverse outcomes were compared across classes B, C, D, and vascular disease (R, F, H) and further stratified by the presence or absence of chronic hypertension. Outcomes examined were a composite perinatal outcome (stillbirth, neonatal death, shoulder dystocia, birth injury, seizures, requiring chest compressions or intubation at delivery, blood pressure support), small for gestational age (SGA), large for gestational age (LGA), macrosomia, shoulder dystocia, preterm delivery at less than 37 weeks of gestation, preeclampsia, and cesarean delivery.
Of the 475 patients, the 1980 White's classification was significantly associated with SGA, LGA, macrosomia, preterm delivery, preeclampsia, and cesarean delivery (P≤.01). Within each White's class based on age or time since diagnosis alone, hypertension was significantly associated with a higher incidence of preeclampsia in class B (16% without hypertension compared with 32% with hypertension, P<.01) and C (22% compared with 40%, P=.04), SGA in C (4.7% compared with 21%, P<.01), preterm delivery in B (25% compared with 46%, P<.01) and C (35% compared with 58%, P=.01), and the composite neonatal outcome in B (7.9% compared with 17%, P=.03). The incidence of adverse outcomes in classes B and C with hypertension resembles the incidence of adverse outcomes in those with diabetes one class higher.
The 1980 White's classification system, taking into consideration the presence of chronic hypertension, remains a useful system for counseling pregestational diabetic women regarding adverse pregnancy outcomes.
II.
评估怀特分类法在当代糖尿病患者群体中的有效性,包括慢性高血压的作用。
我们对2008年至2013年所有患有孕前糖尿病的单胎妊娠进行了一项回顾性队列研究。比较了B、C、D类以及血管疾病(R、F、H)患者的不良结局,并根据是否存在慢性高血压进一步分层。所检查的结局包括围产期综合结局(死产、新生儿死亡、肩难产、产伤、惊厥、分娩时需要胸外按压或插管、血压支持)、小于胎龄儿(SGA)、大于胎龄儿(LGA)、巨大儿、肩难产、妊娠37周前早产、子痫前期和剖宫产。
在475例患者中,1980年的怀特分类法与SGA、LGA、巨大儿、早产、子痫前期和剖宫产显著相关(P≤0.01)。在仅基于年龄或诊断后时间划分的每个怀特分类中,高血压与B类(无高血压者为16%,有高血压者为32%,P<0.01)和C类(分别为22%和40%,P = 0.04)子痫前期的较高发生率显著相关,与C类SGA(分别为4.7%和21%,P<0.01)、B类(分别为25%和46%,P<0.01)和C类(分别为35%和58%,P = 0.01)早产以及B类(分别为7.9%和17%,P = 0.03)围产期综合新生儿结局显著相关。B类和C类有高血压患者的不良结局发生率类似于高一级糖尿病患者的不良结局发生率。
1980年的怀特分类系统,考虑到慢性高血压的存在,对于向孕前糖尿病女性咨询不良妊娠结局仍然是一个有用的系统。
II级。