Schlichte Megan J, Karimkhani Chante, Jones Trevor, Trikha Ritika, Dellavalle Robert P
Colorado School of Public Health, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus; Eastern Colorado Health Care System, US Department of Veteran Affairs.
Dermatol Online J. 2015 Apr 16;21(4):13030/qt88z6r65x.
With a growing sphere of influence in the modern world, online social media serves as a readily accessible interface for communication of information. Aesthetic medicine is one of many industries increasingly influenced by social media, as evidenced by the popular website, "RealSelf," an online community founded in 2006 that compiles ratings, reviews, photographs, and expert physician commentary for nearly 300 cosmetic treatments.
To investigate the current preferences of patients regarding cosmetic non-surgical, surgical, and dental treatments on RealSelf and in the documented medical literature.
On a single day of data collection, all cosmetic treatments or procedures reviewed on the RealSelf website were tabulated, including name, percent "worth it" rating, total number of reviews, and average cost. Patient satisfaction rates documented in the current medical literature for each cosmetic treatment or procedure were also recorded. Statistical t-testingcomparing RealSelf ratings and satisfaction rates in the literature was performed for each category-non-surgical, surgical, and dental.
The top ten most-commonly reviewed non-surgical treatments, top ten most-commonly reviewed surgical procedures, and top 5 most-commonly reviewed dental treatments, along with documented satisfaction rates in the medical literature for each treatment or procedure were recorded in table format and ranked by RealSelf "worth it" rating. Paired t-testing revealed that satisfaction rates documented in the literature were significantly higher than RealSelf "worth it" ratings for both non-surgical cosmetic treatments (p=0.00076) and surgical cosmetic procedures (p=0.00056), with no statistically significant difference for dental treatments.
For prospective patients interested in cosmetic treatments or procedures, social media sites such as RealSelf may offer information helpful to decision-making as well enable cosmetic treatment providers to build reputations and expand practices. "Worth it" ratings on RealSelf may, in fact, represent a more transparent view of cosmetic treatment or procedural outcomes relative to the high satisfaction rates documented in medical literature. Massive online communication of patient experiences made possible through social media will continue to influence the practice of medicine, both aesthetic and otherwise.
在现代世界中,随着影响力范围的不断扩大,在线社交媒体成为了一个易于获取的信息交流界面。美容医学是受社交媒体影响日益增大的众多行业之一,2006年创立的热门网站“真实自我”(RealSelf)便是一个例证,这是一个在线社区,它为近300种美容治疗收集评分、评论、照片以及专家医生的评论。
调查患者目前在RealSelf上以及在已发表的医学文献中对非手术美容、手术美容和牙科治疗的偏好。
在数据收集的某一天,将RealSelf网站上评论的所有美容治疗或手术进行列表统计,包括名称、“值得做”评分百分比、评论总数以及平均费用。还记录了当前医学文献中每种美容治疗或手术的患者满意度。对非手术、手术和牙科每个类别进行了比较RealSelf评分和文献中满意度的统计t检验。
以表格形式记录了十大最常被评论的非手术治疗、十大最常被评论的手术以及五大最常被评论的牙科治疗,并按照RealSelf的“值得做”评分进行排名,同时记录了每种治疗或手术在医学文献中的满意度。配对t检验显示,对于非手术美容治疗(p = 0.00076)和手术美容手术(p = 0.00056),文献中记录的满意度显著高于RealSelf的“值得做”评分,而牙科治疗则无统计学显著差异。
对于对美容治疗或手术感兴趣的潜在患者而言,像RealSelf这样的社交媒体网站可能会提供有助于决策的信息,也能使美容治疗提供者建立声誉并拓展业务。实际上,相对于医学文献中记录的高满意度,RealSelf上的“值得做”评分可能代表了对美容治疗或手术结果更透明的看法。通过社交媒体实现的患者体验的大规模在线交流将继续影响美容医学及其他医学领域的实践。