Suppr超能文献

除皱术:Realself 社交媒体分析。

Rhytidectomy: A Realself Social Media Analysis.

机构信息

Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

出版信息

Facial Plast Surg Aesthet Med. 2020 May/Jun;22(3):207-212. doi: 10.1089/fpsam.2020.0020. Epub 2020 Mar 31.

Abstract

Social media has become a mainstream method of allowing patients to report and rate their satisfaction with cosmetic procedures and providers. To date, very few studies have published patient-reported satisfaction with the rhytidectomy procedure. We sought to perform a social media analysis of the rhytidectomy procedure. Data were extracted from 1876 consecutive rhytidectomy online reviews completed by individuals on "facelift" from the RealSelf website, from April 2017 to June 2019. Patients who did not undergo the procedure were excluded. Reasons for pursuing surgery, choosing a surgeon, and liking the surgical outcome were identified. Surgical and demographic variables, cost, and overall "Worth It" scores were recorded. Data were analyzed using SPSS Version 25. Valid frequencies and percentages are presented excluding missing data. Of the data that could be extracted from 1876 RealSelf reviews, the majority of reviewers were female (88.3%), aged between 60 and 69 years (40.1%). Predominant reasons reviewers chose their surgeons related to favorable surgeon personality/demeanor (20.0%) and establishing a positive rapport with the surgeon during the consultation who was able to answer the patients' questions. In total, 85.0% (1045) of reviewers felt surgery was "Worth It," whereas 0.7% (8) were undecided and 14.4% (177) felt it was not worth it. The aggregate "Worth It Rating" of rhytidectomy, using RealSelf's methodology (i.e., not including unsure responses) was 96.9. The main reasons those who liked their surgical outcome related to reviewers looking younger and "fresher" (31.1%), natural or "not fake" (18.4%), and developing positive emotional responses including feeling more confident and happier (18.2%). Of those who did not feel the surgery was "Worth It," postoperative scarring, short-lasting results, and ineffective and/or poor results were common reasons why reviewers did not like their outcome. The overall satisfaction with rhytidectomy surgery was high within this cohort, which is in keeping with satisfaction rates reported in the literature. Many patients chose their surgeon based on favorable personality traits and emotional connections rather than other factors.

摘要

社交媒体已成为患者报告和评价他们对美容手术和提供者满意度的主流方法。迄今为止,很少有研究发表过关于除皱术患者满意度的报告。我们试图对除皱术进行社交媒体分析。数据从 2017 年 4 月至 2019 年 6 月期间,个人在 RealSelf 网站上完成的 1876 项连续除皱术在线评论中提取,这些患者均接受了除皱术。排除未接受手术的患者。确定了接受手术的原因、选择外科医生的原因以及对手术结果的满意度。记录了手术和人口统计学变量、成本和整体“值得”评分。使用 SPSS 版本 25 进行数据分析。排除缺失数据后呈现有效频率和百分比。在可以从 1876 个 RealSelf 评论中提取的数据中,大多数评论者为女性(88.3%),年龄在 60 至 69 岁之间(40.1%)。评论者选择外科医生的主要原因与外科医生有利的个性/举止(20.0%)和在咨询期间与外科医生建立积极的融洽关系有关,外科医生能够回答患者的问题。共有 85.0%(1045 人)的评论者认为手术“值得”,而 0.7%(8 人)不确定,14.4%(177 人)认为不值得。使用 RealSelf 方法(即不包括不确定的回复)对除皱术的总体“值得”评分是 96.9。那些喜欢手术结果的人的主要原因与评论者看起来更年轻和“更清新”(31.1%)、自然或“不虚假”(18.4%)以及产生积极的情感反应有关,包括感到更自信和更快乐(18.2%)。那些认为手术不值得的人,术后疤痕、效果持续时间短以及手术无效和/或效果不佳是他们不喜欢手术结果的常见原因。在这一队列中,除皱术的总体满意度很高,这与文献报道的满意度一致。许多患者选择外科医生是基于有利的个性特征和情感联系,而不是其他因素。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验