• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肺叶切除术后无病生存期缩短:筛查的意义

Diminished Disease-Free Survival After Lobectomy: Screening Implications.

作者信息

Reich Jerome M, Kim Jong S, Asaph James W

机构信息

Thoracic Oncology Program, Earle A. Chiles Research Institute, Portland, OR.

Fariborz Maseeh Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Portland State University, Portland, OR.

出版信息

Clin Lung Cancer. 2015 Sep;16(5):391-7. doi: 10.1016/j.cllc.2015.03.003. Epub 2015 Mar 27.

DOI:10.1016/j.cllc.2015.03.003
PMID:25933546
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to estimate the effect of lobectomy on life expectancy in healthy smokers and consider the implications for lung cancer screening.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In a retrospective cohort study that provided a minimum of 15 years of follow-up, we analyzed lung cancer survival, all-cause survival, and fatality (1-survival) of 261 persons with stage I non-small-cell lung cancer who underwent lobectomy at Portland Providence Medical Center between 1978 and 1994. We: (1) compared 5-year disease-free fatality (non-lung-cancer fatality) with lung cancer fatality; and (2) based on actuarial data that demonstrated life expectancy equivalence of the healthiest smokers (whom we assumed would be comparable with subjects judged eligible for lobectomy) in the US population, we compared their long-term, disease-free survival (our primary end point) with actuarial expectations by computing the Kaplan-Meier survival function of the differences between lifetimes since surgery in disease-free persons versus matched, expected remaining lifetimes in the US population.

RESULTS

(1) Five-year disease-free fatality (16.1%) was 58% as high as 5-year lung cancer fatality (27.6%); (2) disease-free survival was reduced by 6.9-years (95% confidence interval, 5.5-8.3), 41% of actuarial life expectancy (17 years). The divergence from expected survival took place largely after 6 years of follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Lobectomy materially diminishes long-term disease-free survival in the healthiest smokers--persons judged healthy enough to tolerate major surgery and to have sufficient pulmonary reserve to sustain loss of one-fifth of their lung tissue. In screened populations, diminished survival in overdiagnosed persons will offset, to an undetermined extent, the mortality benefit imparted by preemption of advanced lung cancer.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在评估肺叶切除术对健康吸烟者预期寿命的影响,并探讨其对肺癌筛查的意义。

材料与方法

在一项提供至少15年随访的回顾性队列研究中,我们分析了1978年至1994年间在波特兰普罗维登斯医疗中心接受肺叶切除术的261例I期非小细胞肺癌患者的肺癌生存率、全因生存率和死亡率(1-生存率)。我们:(1)比较了5年无病死亡率(非肺癌死亡率)和肺癌死亡率;(2)根据精算数据显示美国人群中最健康的吸烟者(我们假设其与被判定适合肺叶切除术的受试者具有可比性)的预期寿命相等,通过计算无病患者术后生存时间与美国人群中匹配的预期剩余寿命之间差异的Kaplan-Meier生存函数,将他们的长期无病生存率(我们的主要终点)与精算预期进行比较。

结果

(1)5年无病死亡率(16.1%)是5年肺癌死亡率(27.6%)的58%;(2)无病生存率降低了6.9年(95%置信区间,5.5-8.3),占精算预期寿命(17年)的41%。与预期生存的差异主要发生在随访6年后。

结论

肺叶切除术在很大程度上降低了最健康吸烟者的长期无病生存率——这些人被判定健康到足以耐受大手术,并且有足够的肺储备来维持五分之一肺组织的损失。在筛查人群中,过度诊断人群生存率的降低将在一定程度上抵消早期肺癌筛查所带来的死亡率益处,但抵消程度尚不确定。

相似文献

1
Diminished Disease-Free Survival After Lobectomy: Screening Implications.肺叶切除术后无病生存期缩短:筛查的意义
Clin Lung Cancer. 2015 Sep;16(5):391-7. doi: 10.1016/j.cllc.2015.03.003. Epub 2015 Mar 27.
2
Outcomes of sublobar resection versus lobectomy for stage I non-small cell lung cancer: a 13-year analysis.I期非小细胞肺癌亚肺叶切除与肺叶切除的疗效:一项13年的分析。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2006 Aug;82(2):408-15; discussion 415-6. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2006.02.029.
3
Impact of tumor size on outcomes after anatomic lung resection for stage 1A non-small cell lung cancer based on the current staging system.基于现行分期系统,肿瘤大小对 1A 期非小细胞肺癌解剖性肺切除术后结局的影响。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2012 Feb;143(2):390-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2011.10.023. Epub 2011 Dec 9.
4
Robotic lobectomy for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): long-term oncologic results.机器人辅助肺叶切除术治疗非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC):长期肿瘤学结果。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2012 Feb;143(2):383-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2011.10.055. Epub 2011 Nov 20.
5
Video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy vs. conventional lobectomy via open thoracotomy in patients with clinical stage IA non-small cell lung carcinoma.电视辅助胸腔镜肺叶切除术与传统开胸肺叶切除术治疗临床ⅠA期非小细胞肺癌的对比研究
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2007 Oct;6(5):614-7. doi: 10.1510/icvts.2007.157701. Epub 2007 Jul 26.
6
Wedge resection for non-small cell lung cancer in patients with pulmonary insufficiency: prospective ten-year survival.肺功能不全患者非小细胞肺癌楔形切除术:十年前瞻性生存率
J Thorac Oncol. 2006 Nov;1(9):960-4.
7
Long-term survival after lobectomy for non-small cell lung cancer by video-assisted thoracic surgery versus thoracotomy.电视辅助胸腔镜手术与开胸肺叶切除术治疗非小细胞肺癌的长期生存比较。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2013 Sep;96(3):951-60; discussion 960-1. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2013.04.104. Epub 2013 Jul 16.
8
Long-term survival after video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy for primary lung cancer.电视辅助胸腔镜手术肺叶切除术治疗原发性肺癌的长期生存。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2010 Feb;89(2):353-9. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2009.10.034.
9
Long-term survival following pneumonectomy for non-small cell lung cancer: clinical implications for follow-up care.非小细胞肺癌肺切除术后的长期生存:随访护理的临床意义
Chest. 2007 Jul;132(1):178-84. doi: 10.1378/chest.07-0554. Epub 2007 May 15.
10
Video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy versus stereotactic radiotherapy for stage I lung cancer.电视辅助胸腔镜肺叶切除术与立体定向放射治疗用于I期肺癌的比较
Ann Thorac Surg. 2015 Apr;99(4):1122-9. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2014.11.009. Epub 2015 Feb 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Inequivalence of non-aggressiveness in clinically diagnosed lung cancers and overdiagnosis in lung cancer screening trials.临床诊断肺癌中侵袭性不足与肺癌筛查试验中过度诊断的不等效性。
J Thorac Dis. 2018 Mar;10(3):1230-1232. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2018.01.164.
2
Five reasons for caution in advocating low-dose computerized tomographic lung cancer screening.提倡低剂量计算机断层扫描肺癌筛查时需谨慎的五个原因。
J Thorac Dis. 2017 Sep;9(9):3433-3436. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2017.08.123.