• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

扩展皮肤致敏阈值(DST)方法以纳入被归类为具有反应性的化学品。

Extension of the Dermal Sensitisation Threshold (DST) approach to incorporate chemicals classified as reactive.

作者信息

Safford Robert J, Api Anne Marie, Roberts David W, Lalko Jon F

机构信息

B-Safe Toxicology Consulting, 31 Hayway, Rushden, Northants NN10 6AG, United Kingdom.

Research Institute for Fragrance Materials, Inc., 50 Tice Boulevard, Woodcliff Lake, NJ 07677, United States.

出版信息

Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2015 Aug;72(3):694-701. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2015.04.020. Epub 2015 Apr 29.

DOI:10.1016/j.yrtph.2015.04.020
PMID:25934255
Abstract

The evaluation of chemicals for their skin sensitising potential is an essential step in ensuring the safety of ingredients in consumer products. Similar to the Threshold of Toxicological Concern, the Dermal Sensitisation Threshold (DST) has been demonstrated to provide effective risk assessments for skin sensitisation in cases where human exposure is low. The DST was originally developed based on a Local Lymph Node Assay (LLNA) dataset and applied to chemicals that were not considered to be directly reactive to skin proteins, and unlikely to initiate the first mechanistic steps leading to the induction of sensitisation. Here we have extended the DST concept to protein reactive chemicals. A probabilistic assessment of the original DST dataset was conducted and a threshold of 64 μg/cm(2) was derived. In our accompanying publication, a set of structural chemistry based rules was developed to proactively identify highly reactive and potentially highly potent materials which should be excluded from the DST approach. The DST and rule set were benchmarked against a test set of chemicals with LLNA/human data. It is concluded that by combining the reactive DST with knowledge of chemistry a threshold can be established below which there is no appreciable risk of sensitisation for protein-reactive chemicals.

摘要

评估化学品的皮肤致敏潜力是确保消费品成分安全的重要一步。与毒理学关注阈值类似,皮肤致敏阈值(DST)已被证明在人体暴露量较低的情况下能为皮肤致敏提供有效的风险评估。DST最初是基于局部淋巴结试验(LLNA)数据集开发的,应用于那些被认为不会直接与皮肤蛋白发生反应、不太可能引发导致致敏诱导的首个机制步骤的化学品。在此,我们将DST概念扩展至与蛋白发生反应的化学品。对原始DST数据集进行了概率评估,得出阈值为64μg/cm²。在我们的配套出版物中,制定了一套基于结构化学的规则,以主动识别那些应被排除在DST方法之外的高反应性和潜在高效力物质。DST和规则集以一组具有LLNA/人体数据的化学品测试集为基准进行了验证。得出的结论是,通过将反应性DST与化学知识相结合,可以确定一个阈值,低于该阈值时,与蛋白发生反应的化学品不存在明显的致敏风险。

相似文献

1
Extension of the Dermal Sensitisation Threshold (DST) approach to incorporate chemicals classified as reactive.扩展皮肤致敏阈值(DST)方法以纳入被归类为具有反应性的化学品。
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2015 Aug;72(3):694-701. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2015.04.020. Epub 2015 Apr 29.
2
Principles for identification of High Potency Category Chemicals for which the Dermal Sensitisation Threshold (DST) approach should not be applied.不应采用皮肤致敏阈值(DST)方法的高效能类别化学品的识别原则。
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2015 Aug;72(3):683-93. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2015.03.001. Epub 2015 Mar 9.
3
Refinement of the Dermal Sensitisation Threshold (DST) approach using a larger dataset and incorporating mechanistic chemistry domains.利用更大的数据集和纳入机制化学领域来完善皮肤致敏阈值 (DST) 方法。
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2011 Jul;60(2):218-24. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2011.03.009. Epub 2011 Apr 3.
4
The Dermal Sensitisation Threshold- a TTC approach for allergic contact dermatitis.皮肤致敏阈值——一种用于过敏性接触性皮炎的TTC方法。
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2008 Jul;51(2):195-200. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2008.02.010. Epub 2008 Mar 18.
5
Application of the dermal sensitization threshold concept to chemicals classified as high potency category for skin sensitization assessment of ingredients for consumer products.将皮肤致敏阈值概念应用于被归类为高效能类别的化学品,以评估消费品成分的皮肤致敏性。
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2020 Nov;117:104732. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2020.104732. Epub 2020 Aug 11.
6
Updating the Dermal Sensitisation Thresholds using an expanded dataset and an in silico expert system.使用扩展数据集和基于计算机的专家系统更新皮肤致敏阈值。
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2022 Aug;133:105200. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2022.105200. Epub 2022 Jun 1.
7
Chemical applicability domain of the Local Lymph Node Assay (LLNA) for skin sensitisation potency. Part 2. The biological variability of the murine Local Lymph Node Assay (LLNA) for skin sensitisation.局部淋巴结试验(LLNA)对皮肤致敏效力的化学适用范围。第2部分。小鼠局部淋巴结试验(LLNA)对皮肤致敏的生物学变异性。
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2016 Oct;80:255-9. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2016.07.013. Epub 2016 Jul 26.
8
Potency values from the local lymph node assay: application to classification, labelling and risk assessment.局部淋巴结试验的效价值:在分类、标签和风险评估中的应用。
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2010 Feb;56(1):54-66. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2009.08.016. Epub 2009 Sep 4.
9
Feasibility study to support a threshold of sensitization concern concept in risk assessment based on human data.支持基于人体数据的风险评估中致敏关注阈值概念的可行性研究。
Arch Toxicol. 2009 Dec;83(12):1049-60. doi: 10.1007/s00204-009-0460-9.
10
Assessment of the skin sensitising potency of the lower alkyl methacrylate esters.甲基丙烯酸低级烷基酯的皮肤致敏性评估。
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2014 Oct;70(1):24-36. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2014.06.013. Epub 2014 Jun 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Preliminary Analysis of Printed Polypropylene Foils and Pigments After Thermal Treatment Using DSC and Ames Tests.使用差示扫描量热法(DSC)和艾姆斯试验对热处理后的印刷聚丙烯箔和颜料进行的初步分析
Materials (Basel). 2025 Jul 15;18(14):3325. doi: 10.3390/ma18143325.
2
Regulatory frameworks for fragrance safety in cosmetics: a global overview.化妆品香料安全性的监管框架:全球概述。
Toxicol Res. 2025 Mar 1;41(3):199-220. doi: 10.1007/s43188-025-00283-2. eCollection 2025 May.
3
The Skin Sensitisation of Cosmetic Ingredients: Review of Actual Regulatory Status.
化妆品成分的皮肤致敏作用:现行监管状况综述
Toxics. 2023 Apr 21;11(4):392. doi: 10.3390/toxics11040392.
4
Safety assessment scheme for menstrual cups and application for the evaluation of a menstrual cup comprised of medical grade silicone.月经杯安全性评估方案和医用级硅胶月经杯评估申请。
EBioMedicine. 2022 Dec;86:104339. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2022.104339. Epub 2022 Nov 10.
5
Assessing the skin irritation and sensitizing potential of concentrates of water chlorinated in the presence of iodinated X-ray contrast media.评估在含有碘造影剂的水氯化存在下浓缩物的皮肤刺激性和致敏性。
Toxicology. 2022 Oct;480:153335. doi: 10.1016/j.tox.2022.153335. Epub 2022 Sep 16.
6
Predicting the Skin Sensitization Potential of Small Molecules with Machine Learning Models Trained on Biologically Meaningful Descriptors.利用基于具有生物学意义描述符训练的机器学习模型预测小分子的皮肤致敏潜力。
Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2021 Aug 11;14(8):790. doi: 10.3390/ph14080790.
7
Skin Doctor CP: Conformal Prediction of the Skin Sensitization Potential of Small Organic Molecules.皮肤医生 CP:小分子有机化合物皮肤致敏性的保形预测。
Chem Res Toxicol. 2021 Feb 15;34(2):330-344. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrestox.0c00253. Epub 2020 Dec 9.