Aldosary Ghada, Nobah Ahmad, Al-Zorkani Faisal, Devic Slobodan, Moftah Belal
Medical Physics Unit, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Biomedical Physics Department, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Med Dosim. 2015 Winter;40(4):304-13. doi: 10.1016/j.meddos.2015.03.008. Epub 2015 Apr 29.
The effect of a treatment couch on dose perturbation is not always fully considered in intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT). In the course of inverse planning radiotherapy techniques, beam parameter optimization may change in the absence of the couch, causing errors in the calculated dose distributions. Although modern treatment planning systems (TPS) include data for the treatment couch components, they are not manufactured identically. Thus, variations in their Hounsfield unit (HU) values may exist. Moreover, a radiotherapy facility may wish to have a third-party custom tabletop installed that is not included by the TPS vendor. This study demonstrates a practical and simple method of acquiring reliable computed tomography (CT) data for the treatment couch and shows how the absorbed dose calculated with the modeled treatment couch can differ from that with the default treatment couch found in the TPS. We also experimentally verified that neglecting to incorporate the treatment couch completely in the treatment planning process might result in dose differences of up to 9.5% and 7.3% for 4-MV and 10-MV photon beams, respectively. Furthermore, 20 RapidArc and IMRT cases were used to quantify the change in calculated dose distributions caused by using either the default or modeled couch. From 2-dimensional (2D) ionization chamber array measurements, we observed large dose distribution differences between the measurements and calculations when the couch was omitted that varied according to the planning technique and anatomic site. Thus, incorporating the treatment couch in the dose calculation phase of treatment planning significantly decreases dose calculation errors.
在调强放射治疗(IMRT)和容积调强弧形治疗(VMAT)中,治疗床对剂量扰动的影响并非总是得到充分考虑。在逆向计划放射治疗技术过程中,在没有治疗床的情况下,射束参数优化可能会发生变化,从而导致计算出的剂量分布出现误差。尽管现代治疗计划系统(TPS)包含了治疗床组件的数据,但它们的制造并不完全相同。因此,它们的亨氏单位(HU)值可能存在差异。此外,放疗机构可能希望安装第三方定制的桌面,而TPS供应商并未提供该数据。本研究展示了一种获取治疗床可靠计算机断层扫描(CT)数据的实用且简单的方法,并显示了使用建模治疗床计算出的吸收剂量与TPS中默认治疗床计算出的吸收剂量有何不同。我们还通过实验验证了在治疗计划过程中完全忽略纳入治疗床可能分别导致4-MV和10-MV光子束的剂量差异高达9.5%和7.3%。此外,使用20个快速弧形和IMRT病例来量化使用默认或建模治疗床导致的计算剂量分布变化。通过二维(2D)电离室阵列测量,我们观察到在省略治疗床时,测量值与计算值之间存在很大的剂量分布差异,这种差异会根据计划技术和解剖部位而变化。因此,在治疗计划的剂量计算阶段纳入治疗床可显著降低剂量计算误差。