Cordero Torres Juan Antonio, Caballero Oliver Antonio
Unidad de Emergencias de Badajoz, Servicio Extremeño de Salud, España; Ciencias de la Salud en Emergencias, Universidad de Extremadura, Badajoz, España.
Unidad de Urgencias, Hospital General Universitario Virgen del Rocío de Sevilla, Servicio Andaluz de Salud, Sevilla, España.
Aten Primaria. 2015 Jun-Jul;47(6):376-84. doi: 10.1016/j.aprim.2015.02.006. Epub 2015 Apr 28.
The aim of this study is to assess the validity and use of a mixed method of training in life support. The use of Moodle to implement an online pre-sessional phase prior to a "classic" classroom phase of teaching in this type of course is the main novelty.
Analysis of satisfaction questionnaires of students and instructors of a mixed course in the advanced life support program of SemFYC (ESVAP).
Moodle platform. semFYC Virtual Classroom.
PARTICIPANTS AND/OR CONTEXTS: Students and instructors participating in the semFYC advanced life support program, ESVAP.
Qualitative analysis.
The majority of students rate as very useful (50%) or useful (45.37%) the existence of an online pre-sessional phase, and consider that it has helped them very much (42.20%) or quite a lot (48.62%) to make the most of the face-to-face sessions. For instructors, they considered that the existence of an online pre-sessional phase was very useful (89%) or useful (11%) for the development of the face-to-face sessions.
The analysis of the results concluded that: 1) the students considered a prior non-face to face phase as very useful, and it helped them much/very much in the face to face phase, and 2) the instructors believe that the non-face to face phase had helped them a lot in the presentations and efficiency of the workshops in the face-to-face phase.
本研究旨在评估一种混合式生命支持培训方法的有效性及应用情况。在这类课程的“经典”课堂教学阶段之前,使用Moodle实施在线课前阶段是主要创新点。
对SemFYC(ESVAP)高级生命支持项目混合课程的学生和教师满意度问卷进行分析。
Moodle平台。semFYC虚拟教室。
参与者和/或背景:参与semFYC高级生命支持项目ESVAP的学生和教师。
定性分析。
大多数学生认为在线课前阶段非常有用(50%)或有用(45.37%),并认为这对他们充分利用面对面课程帮助很大(42.20%)或相当大(48.62%)。对于教师而言,他们认为在线课前阶段对面对面课程的开展非常有用(89%)或有用(11%)。
对结果的分析得出以下结论:1)学生认为课前非面对面阶段非常有用,且在面对面阶段对他们帮助很大/非常大;2)教师认为非面对面阶段在面对面阶段的工作坊展示和效率方面对他们帮助很大。