• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不同的基层医疗数据库能否得出可比的疾病负担估计值:一项关于下肢静脉溃疡的研究结果

Can different primary care databases produce comparable estimates of burden of disease: results of a study exploring venous leg ulceration.

作者信息

Petherick Emily S, Pickett Kate E, Cullum Nicky A

机构信息

Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford, School of Health Studies, University of Bradford, Bradford,

Department of Health Sciences, and Hull York Medical School, University of York, York and.

出版信息

Fam Pract. 2015 Aug;32(4):374-80. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmv013. Epub 2015 May 1.

DOI:10.1093/fampra/cmv013
PMID:25934977
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5942540/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Primary care databases from the UK have been widely used to produce evidence on the epidemiology and health service usage of a wide range of conditions. To date there have been few evaluations of the comparability of estimates between different sources of these data.

AIM

To estimate the comparability of two widely used primary care databases, the Health Improvement Network Database (THIN) and the General Practice Research Database (GPRD) using venous leg ulceration as an exemplar condition.

DESIGN OF STUDY

Cross prospective cohort comparison.

SETTING

GPRD and the THIN databases using data from 1998 to 2006.

METHOD

A data set was extracted from both databases containing all cases of persons aged 20 years or greater with a database diagnosis of venous leg ulceration recorded in the databases for the period 1998-2006. Annual rates of incidence and prevalence of venous leg ulceration were calculated within each database and standardized to the European standard population and compared using standardized rate ratios.

RESULTS

Comparable estimates of venous leg ulcer incidence from the GPRD and THIN databases could be obtained using data from 2000 to 2006 and of prevalence using data from 2001 to 2006.

CONCLUSIONS

Recent data collected by these two databases are more likely to produce comparable results of the burden venous leg ulceration. These results require confirmation in other disease areas to enable researchers to have confidence in the comparability of findings from these two widely used primary care research resources.

摘要

背景

英国的基层医疗数据库已被广泛用于生成关于多种疾病的流行病学和卫生服务使用情况的证据。迄今为止,对这些数据不同来源的估计可比性进行的评估较少。

目的

以静脉性腿部溃疡为例,评估两个广泛使用的基层医疗数据库——健康改善网络数据库(THIN)和全科医疗研究数据库(GPRD)的可比性。

研究设计

交叉前瞻性队列比较。

研究地点

使用1998年至2006年数据的GPRD和THIN数据库。

方法

从两个数据库中提取一个数据集,其中包含1998 - 2006年期间数据库记录的所有年龄在20岁及以上且诊断为静脉性腿部溃疡的病例。在每个数据库中计算静脉性腿部溃疡的年发病率和患病率,并根据欧洲标准人群进行标准化,然后使用标准化率比进行比较。

结果

使用2000年至2006年的数据可获得GPRD和THIN数据库中静脉性腿部溃疡发病率的可比估计值,使用2001年至2006年的数据可获得患病率的可比估计值。

结论

这两个数据库收集的近期数据更有可能得出静脉性腿部溃疡负担的可比结果。这些结果需要在其他疾病领域得到证实,以便研究人员能够对这两个广泛使用的基层医疗研究资源的研究结果可比性有信心。

相似文献

1
Can different primary care databases produce comparable estimates of burden of disease: results of a study exploring venous leg ulceration.不同的基层医疗数据库能否得出可比的疾病负担估计值:一项关于下肢静脉溃疡的研究结果
Fam Pract. 2015 Aug;32(4):374-80. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmv013. Epub 2015 May 1.
2
Investigation of the effect of deprivation on the burden and management of venous leg ulcers: a cohort study using the THIN database.利用 THIN 数据库进行的队列研究:调查剥夺对静脉性腿部溃疡负担和管理的影响。
PLoS One. 2013;8(3):e58948. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0058948. Epub 2013 Mar 19.
3
Venous leg ulcer: incidence and prevalence in the elderly.下肢静脉溃疡:老年人中的发病率和患病率
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2002 Mar;46(3):381-6. doi: 10.1067/mjd.2002.121739.
4
Publication of UK NICE Clinical Guidelines 168 has not significantly changed the management of leg ulcers in primary care: An analysis of The Health Improvement Network database.英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所(NICE)临床指南168的发布并未显著改变基层医疗中腿部溃疡的管理:对健康改善网络数据库的分析
Phlebology. 2019 Jun;34(5):311-316. doi: 10.1177/0268355518805658. Epub 2018 Oct 18.
5
Validity of Chronic Venous Disease Diagnoses and Epidemiology Using Validated Electronic Health Records From Primary Care: A Real-World Data Analysis.基于初级保健中验证后的电子健康记录的慢性静脉疾病诊断和流行病学的有效性:真实世界数据分析。
J Nurs Scholarsh. 2021 May;53(3):296-305. doi: 10.1111/jnu.12639. Epub 2021 Feb 27.
6
Hemochromatosis C282Y gene mutation increases the risk of venous leg ulceration.血色素沉着症C282Y基因突变会增加下肢静脉溃疡的风险。
J Vasc Surg. 2005 Aug;42(2):309-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2005.04.003.
7
Health service costs of treating venous leg ulcers in the UK: evidence from a cross-sectional survey based in the north west of England.英国治疗静脉性腿部溃疡的医疗服务成本:基于英格兰西北部的横断面调查证据。
BMJ Open. 2022 Jan 6;12(1):e056790. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-056790.
8
Aetiology of chronic leg ulcers.慢性腿部溃疡的病因
Eur J Vasc Surg. 1992 May;6(3):245-51. doi: 10.1016/s0950-821x(05)80313-5.
9
Assessing venous ulcer population characteristics and practices in a home care community.评估家庭护理社区中静脉溃疡患者的群体特征及治疗方法。
Ostomy Wound Manage. 2003 May;49(5):32-4, 38-40, 42-3.
10
Prevalence, incidence, management, and predictors of venous ulcers in the long-term-care population using the MDS.使用最低数据集(MDS)对长期护理人群中静脉溃疡的患病率、发病率、管理及预测因素进行研究
Adv Skin Wound Care. 2000 Sep-Oct;13(5):218-24.

引用本文的文献

1
Risk of COVID-19 among unvaccinated and vaccinated patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: a general population study.未接种疫苗和接种疫苗的系统性红斑狼疮患者 COVID-19 风险:一项基于普通人群的研究。
RMD Open. 2023 Mar;9(1). doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2022-002839.
2
Health service costs of treating venous leg ulcers in the UK: evidence from a cross-sectional survey based in the north west of England.英国治疗静脉性腿部溃疡的医疗服务成本:基于英格兰西北部的横断面调查证据。
BMJ Open. 2022 Jan 6;12(1):e056790. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-056790.
3
Disease burden of diabetes, diabetic retinopathy and their future projections in the UK: cross-sectional analyses of a primary care database.英国糖尿病、糖尿病性视网膜病变及其未来预测的疾病负担:基于初级保健数据库的横断面分析。
BMJ Open. 2021 Jul 12;11(7):e050058. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050058.
4
Prescribed Exercise With Compression vs Compression Alone in Treating Patients With Venous Leg Ulcers: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.处方运动联合压迫疗法与单纯压迫疗法治疗静脉性溃疡患者的效果:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Dermatol. 2018 Nov 1;154(11):1304-1311. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2018.3281.
5
Low dose aspirin as adjuvant treatment for venous leg ulceration: pragmatic, randomised, double blind, placebo controlled trial (Aspirin4VLU).低剂量阿司匹林作为下肢静脉溃疡辅助治疗:实用、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验(Aspirin4VLU)
BMJ. 2017 Nov 24;359:j5157. doi: 10.1136/bmj.j5157.

本文引用的文献

1
Electronic medical records: the way forward for primary care research?电子病历:初级保健研究的未来之路?
Fam Pract. 2014 Apr;31(2):127-9. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmu009. Epub 2014 Mar 13.
2
Investigation of the effect of deprivation on the burden and management of venous leg ulcers: a cohort study using the THIN database.利用 THIN 数据库进行的队列研究:调查剥夺对静脉性腿部溃疡负担和管理的影响。
PLoS One. 2013;8(3):e58948. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0058948. Epub 2013 Mar 19.
3
Validation studies of the health improvement network (THIN) database for pharmacoepidemiology research.用于药物流行病学研究的健康改善网络(THIN)数据库的验证研究。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2007 Apr;16(4):393-401. doi: 10.1002/pds.1335.
4
Prevalence of lower-limb ulceration: a systematic review of prevalence studies.下肢溃疡的患病率:患病率研究的系统评价
Adv Skin Wound Care. 2003 Nov;16(6):305-16. doi: 10.1097/00129334-200311000-00013.
5
Venous leg ulcer: incidence and prevalence in the elderly.下肢静脉溃疡:老年人中的发病率和患病率
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2002 Mar;46(3):381-6. doi: 10.1067/mjd.2002.121739.
6
Use of the General Practice Research Database (GPRD) for respiratory epidemiology: a comparison with the 4th Morbidity Survey in General Practice (MSGP4).利用全科医疗研究数据库(GPRD)进行呼吸道疾病流行病学研究:与第四次全科医疗发病率调查(MSGP4)的比较。
Thorax. 1999 May;54(5):413-9. doi: 10.1136/thx.54.5.413.
7
A survey of the management of leg ulcers in primary care settings in Scotland.苏格兰基层医疗环境下腿部溃疡管理情况的调查。
J Clin Nurs. 1998 Jan;7(1):45-50. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2702.1998.00124.x.
8
Community leg ulcer clinics: a comparative study in two health authorities.社区腿部溃疡诊所:在两个卫生当局的比较研究
BMJ. 1996 Jun 29;312(7047):1648-51. doi: 10.1136/bmj.312.7047.1648.
9
Standardization of risk ratios.风险比率的标准化
Am J Epidemiol. 1972 Dec;96(6):383-8. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a121470.
10
Statistical methods in cancer research. Volume II--The design and analysis of cohort studies.癌症研究中的统计方法。第二卷——队列研究的设计与分析。
IARC Sci Publ. 1987(82):1-406.