Lamberti Filippo, Di Clemente Francesca, Remoli Romolo, Bellini Cesare, De Santis Antonella, Mercurio Marina, Dottori Serena, Gaspardone Achille
Department of Medicine, Cardiovascular Section, San Eugenio Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Department of Medicine, Cardiovascular Section, San Eugenio Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Int J Cardiol. 2015;190:338-43. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2015.04.146. Epub 2015 Apr 17.
Catheter ablation is the treatment of choice for many patients with idiopathic ventricular tachycardia (VT). Unfortunately, conventional catheter ablation is guided by fluoroscopy, which is associated with a small but definite radiation risk for patients and laboratory personnel. The aim of our study is to assess feasibility, success rate and safety of idiopathic VT ablation procedure performed without the use of fluoroscopy.
Nineteen consecutive patients undergoing idiopathic VT ablation at our institution have been included. The ablation procedures were performed under the guidance of electroanatomical mapping (EAM) system and intracardiac echocardiography (ICE).
Nineteen patients (mean age 38.7 years) underwent ablation procedure for idiopathic VT. Twelve (63%) had outflow tract VT, 3 (18%) fascicular tachycardia, 2 (11%) peri-tricuspidal VT, 1 (5%) peri-mitral VT, and 1 (5%) lateral left free-wall VT. The mean procedural time was 170.2 ± 45.7 min. No fluoroscopy was used in any procedural phase. Acute success rate was 100%. No complication was documented in any patients. After a mean follow up of 18 ± 4 months, recurrences occurred in 2 patients.
In our preliminary experience idiopathic VT ablation without the use of fluoroscopy was feasible and safe, using a combination of EAM and ICE. Success rate was excellent with no complication.
导管消融是许多特发性室性心动过速(VT)患者的首选治疗方法。不幸的是,传统的导管消融由荧光透视引导,这对患者和实验室工作人员有小但明确的辐射风险。我们研究的目的是评估在不使用荧光透视的情况下进行特发性室性心动过速消融手术的可行性、成功率和安全性。
纳入了在我们机构连续接受特发性室性心动过速消融的19例患者。消融手术在电解剖标测(EAM)系统和心内超声心动图(ICE)的引导下进行。
19例患者(平均年龄38.7岁)接受了特发性室性心动过速的消融手术。12例(63%)有流出道室性心动过速,3例(18%)有分支性心动过速,2例(11%)有三尖瓣周围室性心动过速,1例(5%)有二尖瓣周围室性心动过速,1例(5%)有左心室游离壁外侧室性心动过速。平均手术时间为170.2±45.分钟。任何手术阶段均未使用荧光透视。急性成功率为100%。所有患者均未记录到并发症。平均随访18±4个月后,2例患者复发。
根据我们的初步经验,联合使用EAM和ICE,不使用荧光透视进行特发性室性心动过速消融是可行且安全的。成功率很高且无并发症。