Division of Reconstructive Dentistry, Faculty of Odontology, University of Iceland, Reykjavík, Iceland.
Division of Fixed Prosthodontics and Biomaterials, Clinic of Dental Medicine, University of Geneva, Switzerland.
Dent Mater. 2015 Jun;31(6):624-39. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2015.02.013. Epub 2015 Apr 30.
To assess the 5-year survival of metal-ceramic and all-ceramic tooth-supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) and to describe the incidence of biological, technical and esthetic complications.
Medline (PubMed), Embase and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) searches (2006-2013) were performed for clinical studies focusing on tooth-supported FDPs with a mean follow-up of at least 3 years. This was complemented by an additional hand search and the inclusion of 10 studies from a previous systematic review [1]. Survival and complication rates were analyzed using robust Poisson's regression models to obtain summary estimates of 5-year proportions.
Forty studies reporting on 1796 metal-ceramic and 1110 all-ceramic FDPs fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Meta-analysis of the included studies indicated an estimated 5-year survival rate of metal-ceramic FDPs of 94.4% (95% CI: 91.2-96.5%). The estimated survival rate of reinforced glass ceramic FDPs was 89.1% (95% CI: 80.4-94.0%), the survival rate of glass-infiltrated alumina FDPs was 86.2% (95% CI: 69.3-94.2%) and the survival rate of densely sintered zirconia FDPs was 90.4% (95% CI: 84.8-94.0%) in 5 years of function. Even though the survival rate of all-ceramic FDPs was lower than for metal-ceramic FDPs, the differences did not reach statistical significance except for the glass-infiltrated alumina FDPs (p=0.05). A significantly higher incidence of caries in abutment teeth was observed for densely sintered zirconia FDPs compared to metal-ceramic FDPs. Significantly more framework fractures were reported for reinforced glass ceramic FDPs (8.0%) and glass-infiltrated alumina FDPs (12.9%) compared to metal-ceramic FDPs (0.6%) and densely sintered zirconia FDPs (1.9%) in 5 years in function. However, the incidence of ceramic fractures and loss of retention was significantly (p=0.018 and 0.028 respectively) higher for densely sintered zirconia FDPs compared to all other types of FDPs.
Survival rates of all types of all-ceramic FDPs were lower than those reported for metal-ceramic FDPs. The incidence of framework fractures was significantly higher for reinforced glass ceramic FDPs and infiltrated glass ceramic FDPs, and the incidence for ceramic fractures and loss of retention was significantly higher for densely sintered zirconia FDPs compared to metal-ceramic FDPs.
评估金属陶瓷和全瓷牙支持固定义齿(FDP)的 5 年生存率,并描述生物、技术和美观并发症的发生率。
对聚焦于牙支持 FDP 的临床研究进行了 Medline(PubMed)、Embase 和 Cochrane 对照试验中心注册库(CENTRAL)检索(2006-2013 年),随访时间平均至少 3 年。此外,还进行了额外的手工检索,并纳入了之前系统评价[1]中的 10 项研究。使用稳健泊松回归模型分析生存率和并发症发生率,以获得 5 年比例的综合估计值。
40 项研究报告了 1796 例金属陶瓷和 1110 例全瓷 FDP,符合纳入标准。纳入研究的荟萃分析表明,金属陶瓷 FDP 的 5 年估计生存率为 94.4%(95%CI:91.2-96.5%)。增强玻璃陶瓷 FDP 的估计生存率为 89.1%(95%CI:80.4-94.0%),玻璃渗透氧化铝 FDP 的生存率为 86.2%(95%CI:69.3-94.2%),致密烧结氧化锆 FDP 的生存率为 90.4%(95%CI:84.8-94.0%)。在 5 年的功能中,尽管全瓷 FDP 的生存率低于金属陶瓷 FDP,但除玻璃渗透氧化铝 FDP 外(p=0.05),差异均无统计学意义。与金属陶瓷 FDP 相比,致密烧结氧化锆 FDP 观察到基牙龋齿的发生率明显更高。在 5 年的功能中,与金属陶瓷 FDP 和致密烧结氧化锆 FDP 相比,增强玻璃陶瓷 FDP(8.0%)和玻璃渗透氧化铝 FDP(12.9%)报告的支架骨折明显更多(分别为 p=0.018 和 0.028)。然而,与所有其他类型的 FDP 相比,致密烧结氧化锆 FDP 的陶瓷断裂和固位丧失发生率明显更高(分别为 p=0.018 和 0.028)。
所有类型的全瓷 FDP 的生存率均低于金属陶瓷 FDP 的生存率。增强玻璃陶瓷 FDP 和玻璃渗透氧化铝 FDP 的支架骨折发生率明显更高,而致密烧结氧化锆 FDP 的陶瓷断裂和固位丧失发生率明显更高。