Ribeiro Gabriela de Arruda, Oliveira Viviane de Cássia, Faria Adriana Cláudia Lápria, Macedo Ana Paula, Maciel Carla Roberta de Oliveira, Silva Cláudia Helena Lovato da, Ribeiro Ricardo Faria, Rodrigues Renata Cristina Silveira
Department of Dental Materials and Prosthesis, Ribeirão Preto School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, Café Avenue S/N, Ribeirão Preto 14040-904, SP, Brazil.
Antibiotics (Basel). 2025 Jul 23;14(8):739. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics14080739.
: Monolithic zirconia has attracted considerable interest in dentistry due to its favorable physical and mechanical properties, making it a promising alternative for crown fabrication. Nonetheless, a standardized finishing protocol for this material has yet to be established. : This study aimed to evaluate the surface characteristics and in vitro biofilm formation of zirconia finished by either polishing or glazing. : A total of 72 zirconia specimens were fabricated and divided into control, glazing, and polishing groups. Surface analysis included roughness, wettability, and surface free energy. Microbiological analysis included CFU (colony-forming units per mL) counts, microbial adhesion at 2, 4, 6, and 8 h, biofilm biovolume, and qualitative biofilm assessment via scanning electron microscopy (sEm). : The glazing group showed significantly greater roughness than the polishing ( = 0.006) and control ( = 0.016) groups, along with a lower contact angle (polishing- = 0.002; control- < 0.001) and higher surface energy (polishing- = 0.005; control- < 0.001). No significant differences were observed in CFU counts for the tested microorganisms (, = 0.158; , = 0.610; , = 0.904). Regarding microbial adhesion, the polishing group showed a smaller biofilm-covered area compared to the control group for both total biofilm ( = 0.008) and viable biofilm ( = 0.005). no statistically significant difference was observed in biofilm biovolume ( = 0.082). : These findings suggest that, despite the surface differences among the groups, biofilm formation was not significantly affected.
整体式氧化锆因其良好的物理和机械性能在牙科领域引起了广泛关注,使其成为牙冠制作的一种有前景的替代材料。尽管如此,这种材料的标准化修整方案尚未确立。
本研究旨在评估通过抛光或上釉处理的氧化锆的表面特性和体外生物膜形成情况。
共制作了72个氧化锆样本,并将其分为对照组、上釉组和抛光组。表面分析包括粗糙度、润湿性和表面自由能。微生物分析包括每毫升菌落形成单位(CFU)计数、2、4、6和8小时的微生物黏附情况、生物膜生物体积以及通过扫描电子显微镜(SEM)进行的生物膜定性评估。
上釉组的粗糙度显著高于抛光组(P = 0.006)和对照组(P = 0.016),同时接触角更低(与抛光组相比P = 0.002;与对照组相比P < 0.001),表面能更高(与抛光组相比P = 0.005;与对照组相比P < 0.001)。在所测试的微生物的CFU计数方面未观察到显著差异(变形链球菌,P = 0.158;嗜酸乳杆菌,P = 0.610;血链球菌,P = 0.904)。关于微生物黏附,对于总生物膜(P = 0.008)和活生物膜(P = 0.005),抛光组的生物膜覆盖面积均小于对照组。在生物膜生物体积方面未观察到统计学上的显著差异(P = 0.082)。
这些发现表明,尽管各组之间存在表面差异,但生物膜形成并未受到显著影响。