• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

体重指数对超声引导下锁骨下入路外侧肩胛下臂丛神经阻滞时针插入角度的影响。

Effect of body mass index on angle of needle insertion during ultrasound-guided lateral sagittal infraclavicular brachial plexus block.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesia, Cleveland. Clinic, Anesthesiology Institute, OH, USA.

Department of Anesthesia, Dalhousie University, QE II Health Sciences Centre, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.

出版信息

J Clin Anesth. 2015 Aug;27(5):375-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2015.03.039. Epub 2015 Apr 29.

DOI:10.1016/j.jclinane.2015.03.039
PMID:25935834
Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVES

The aim of our study was to establish the angle of needle insertion from the anterior chest wall during ultrasound-guided infraclavicular brachial plexus block and to examine for any correlation between body mass index (BMI) and insertion angle.

DESIGN

This is a prospective observational study.

SETTING

The setting is at an operating room, university-affiliated teaching hospital.

PATIENTS

The patients are 23 American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status 1-3 patients scheduled to undergo elbow, forearm, or hand surgery under regional anesthesia with or without general anesthesia.

INTERVENTIONS

The intervention is infraclavicular brachial plexus block with or without perineural catheter insertion.

MEASUREMENTS

The measurement is the angle of needle insertion in relation to the anterior chest wall, BMI, and needle visibility as graded by the anesthesiologist.

MAIN RESULTS

Twenty-three patients were studied. The mean (SD) BMI was 28.5 (5.4). The median (range) of angle of needle insertion was 50 (33-60). The Pearson correlation coefficient for BMI and angle of needle insertion was 0.357. There were no reported complications.

CONCLUSIONS

The median (range) angle of needle insertion in relation to chest for our study patients was 50° (33°-60°). The needle visibility was rated difficult, requiring hydrolocation or "heeling-in," in 39% of cases. There was a moderate correlation between BMI and angle of insertion. Despite difficulties with needle visualization, the ultrasound-guided infraclavicular brachial plexus block provided reliable analgesia.

摘要

研究目的

本研究旨在确定超声引导锁骨下臂丛神经阻滞时从前胸壁进针的角度,并探讨体重指数(BMI)与进针角度之间的相关性。

设计

这是一项前瞻性观察研究。

地点

在手术室,大学附属医院。

患者

本研究纳入了 23 名美国麻醉医师协会身体状况 1-3 级的患者,这些患者拟在区域麻醉下接受肘部、前臂或手部手术,或在区域麻醉加全身麻醉下接受手术。

干预措施

锁骨下臂丛神经阻滞,包括或不包括神经周围导管插入。

测量

测量的是与前胸壁的进针角度、BMI 以及麻醉医师分级的进针可视性。

主要结果

共 23 名患者纳入研究。平均(SD)BMI 为 28.5(5.4)。进针角度的中位数(范围)为 50(33-60)。BMI 和进针角度的 Pearson 相关系数为 0.357。无报告并发症。

结论

本研究患者的进针角度中位数(范围)为 50°(33°-60°)。39%的情况下,进针可视性被评为困难,需要水定位或“ heel-in”。BMI 和进针角度之间存在中度相关性。尽管存在进针可视化困难,但超声引导锁骨下臂丛神经阻滞可提供可靠的镇痛效果。

相似文献

1
Effect of body mass index on angle of needle insertion during ultrasound-guided lateral sagittal infraclavicular brachial plexus block.体重指数对超声引导下锁骨下入路外侧肩胛下臂丛神经阻滞时针插入角度的影响。
J Clin Anesth. 2015 Aug;27(5):375-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2015.03.039. Epub 2015 Apr 29.
2
Comparison of the coracoid and retroclavicular approaches for ultrasound-guided infraclavicular brachial plexus block.超声引导下锁骨下臂丛神经阻滞喙突入路与锁骨后入路的比较
J Anesth. 2017 Aug;31(4):572-578. doi: 10.1007/s00540-017-2359-6. Epub 2017 Apr 18.
3
Use of a curved needle to facilitate lateral sagittal infraclavicular block performance: a randomized clinical trial.使用弯针辅助行外侧经锁骨下矢状旁阻滞:一项随机临床试验。
J Anesth. 2019 Oct;33(5):604-611. doi: 10.1007/s00540-019-02674-w. Epub 2019 Aug 29.
4
Retroclavicular vs Infraclavicular block for brachial plexus anesthesia: a multi-centric randomized trial.锁骨下入路与锁骨下入路臂丛神经阻滞的比较:一项多中心随机试验。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2019 Oct 27;19(1):193. doi: 10.1186/s12871-019-0868-6.
5
A randomized comparison between costoclavicular and paracoracoid ultrasound-guided infraclavicular block for upper limb surgery.锁骨下与肋锁突下入路超声引导锁骨下臂丛阻滞用于上肢手术的随机对照比较。
Can J Anaesth. 2017 Jun;64(6):617-625. doi: 10.1007/s12630-017-0842-z. Epub 2017 Feb 15.
6
Ultrasound-guided Retroclavicular Approach Versus Costoclavicular Approach of Infraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block for Upper Limb Surgeries.超声引导锁骨下入路与肋锁入路在锁骨上臂丛神经阻滞中的应用比较。
Pain Physician. 2023 Oct;26(6):E651-E660.
7
Enhanced visual acuity with echogenic needles in ultrasound-guided axillary brachial plexus block: a randomized, comparative, observer-blinded study.超声引导下腋路臂丛神经阻滞中使用回声针提高视力:一项随机、对照、观察者盲法研究。
Minerva Anestesiol. 2015 Apr;81(4):369-78. Epub 2014 Jul 24.
8
Posterior parasagittal in-plane ultrasound-guided infraclavicular brachial plexus block-a case series.矢状旁位平面内超声引导下锁骨下臂丛神经阻滞——病例系列
BMC Anesthesiol. 2015 Jul 21;15:105. doi: 10.1186/s12871-015-0090-0.
9
[Minimum effective volume of bupivacaine 0.5% for ultrasound-guided retroclavicular approach to infraclavicular brachial plexus block].[超声引导锁骨后入路锁骨下臂丛神经阻滞时0.5%布比卡因的最小有效容量]
Braz J Anesthesiol. 2019 May-Jun;69(3):253-258. doi: 10.1016/j.bjan.2018.11.011. Epub 2019 Apr 25.
10
Retroclavicular approach vs infraclavicular approach for plexic bloc anesthesia of the upper limb: study protocol randomized controlled trial.锁骨后入路与锁骨下入路在上肢臂丛神经阻滞麻醉中的比较:研究方案 随机对照试验
Trials. 2017 Jul 21;18(1):346. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2086-1.

引用本文的文献

1
Ultrasound-guided infraclavicular approach to brachial plexus: A cadaveric study.超声引导下锁骨下臂丛神经阻滞:一项尸体研究。
Indian J Anaesth. 2023 Nov;67(11):1014-1019. doi: 10.4103/ija.ija_665_23. Epub 2023 Nov 7.
2
Critical structures in the needle path of the costoclavicular brachial plexus block: a cadaver study.锁骨下臂丛神经阻滞的针道中关键结构:尸体研究。
Can J Anaesth. 2021 Aug;68(8):1156-1164. doi: 10.1007/s12630-021-01990-8. Epub 2021 Apr 21.
3
Infraclavicular brachial plexus block in adults: a comprehensive review based on a unified nomenclature system.
成人锁骨下臂丛神经阻滞:基于统一命名系统的综合综述。
J Anesth. 2019 Jun;33(3):463-477. doi: 10.1007/s00540-019-02638-0. Epub 2019 May 10.