Mental symptoms and quality of life in lipoprotein apheresis patients in comparison to hemodialysis patients, platelet donors and normal population.

BACKGROUND

Despite the fact that extracorporeal methods such as lipoprotein apheresis (LA) and hemodialysis (HD) are highly effective in improving the physical status of patients, these treatment options may possibly harm the psychological status and the health related quality of life (HRQL).

METHODS

The occurrences of anxiety, depression and the HRQL of 111 study participants treated with LA (n = 41), HD (n = 41) or undergoing plateletpheresis (PD) (n = 29) were compared to the normal population (NP), using standardized questionnaires (anxiety and depression: Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), heart-focused anxiety: Cardiac Anxiety Questionnaire (CAQ) and HRQL: Short-Form Health Survey (SF-12)). Additionally, the subjective mental and physical stress of study participants was evaluated.

RESULTS

LA females had a significantly elevated HADS-A score compared to PD and NP. Additionally, there was a trend toward higher HADS-A scores in the LA group compared to the HD group in females. In HD males HADS-A and -D scores increased compared to PD and NP. The CAQ revealed a significant increase in the CAQ-Fear scale in LA compared to HD and PD participants. The CAQ-Avoidance score showed significantly increased scores in LA and HD patients compared to PD and NP. In the CAQ-Attention scale the LA patients also showed significantly increased scores compared to PD and NP. The increased psychological symptoms were associated with significantly lower levels of objective and subjective HRQL in LA and HD patients compared to PD and NP.

CONCLUSIONS

LA and HD patients had similarly increased presence of psychological symptoms with concurrent decreased quality of life compared to PD and the normal population, which may affect the outcome of the LA patients. Therefore, early psychosomatic screening and probable psychosomatic treatment should be performed.