Wong Kin-Yiu, Xu Yuqing, Xu Liang
Department of Physics, High Performance Cluster Computing Centre, Institute of Computational and Theoretical Studies, Hong Kong Baptist University, 224 Waterloo Road, Kowloon Tong, Hong Kong; Institute of Research and Continuing Education, Hong Kong Baptist University (Shenzhen), Shenzhen, China.
Department of Physics, High Performance Cluster Computing Centre, Institute of Computational and Theoretical Studies, Hong Kong Baptist University, 224 Waterloo Road, Kowloon Tong, Hong Kong; Institute of Research and Continuing Education, Hong Kong Baptist University (Shenzhen), Shenzhen, China.
Biochim Biophys Acta. 2015 Nov;1854(11):1782-94. doi: 10.1016/j.bbapap.2015.04.021. Epub 2015 Apr 30.
Enzymatic reactions are integral components in many biological functions and malfunctions. The iconic structure of each reaction path for elucidating the reaction mechanism in details is the molecular structure of the rate-limiting transition state (RLTS). But RLTS is very hard to get caught or to get visualized by experimentalists. In spite of the lack of explicit molecular structure of the RLTS in experiment, we still can trace out the RLTS unique "fingerprints" by measuring the isotope effects on the reaction rate. This set of "fingerprints" is considered as a most direct probe of RLTS. By contrast, for computer simulations, oftentimes molecular structures of a number of TS can be precisely visualized on computer screen, however, theoreticians are not sure which TS is the actual rate-limiting one. As a result, this is an excellent stage setting for a perfect "marriage" between experiment and theory for determining the structure of RLTS, along with the reaction mechanism, i.e., experimentalists are responsible for "fingerprinting", whereas theoreticians are responsible for providing candidates that match the "fingerprints". In this Review, the origin of isotope effects on a chemical reaction is discussed from the perspectives of classical and quantum worlds, respectively (e.g., the origins of the inverse kinetic isotope effects and all the equilibrium isotope effects are purely from quantum). The conventional Bigeleisen equation for isotope effect calculations, as well as its refined version in the framework of Feynman's path integral and Kleinert's variational perturbation (KP) theory for systematically incorporating anharmonicity and (non-parabolic) quantum tunneling, are also presented. In addition, the outstanding interplay between theory and experiment for successfully deducing the RLTS structures and the reaction mechanisms is demonstrated by applications on biochemical reactions, namely models of bacterial squalene-to-hopene polycyclization and RNA 2'-O-transphosphorylation. For all these applications, we used our recently-developed path-integral method based on the KP theory, called automated integration-free path-integral (AIF-PI) method, to perform ab initio path-integral calculations of isotope effects. As opposed to the conventional path-integral molecular dynamics (PIMD) and Monte Carlo (PIMC) simulations, values calculated from our AIF-PI path-integral method can be as precise as (not as accurate as) the numerical precision of the computing machine. Lastly, comments are made on the general challenges in theoretical modeling of candidates matching the experimental "fingerprints" of RLTS. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled: Enzyme Transition States from Theory and Experiment.
酶促反应是许多生物功能和功能失调的重要组成部分。用于详细阐明反应机理的每个反应路径的标志性结构是限速过渡态(RLTS)的分子结构。但是,实验人员很难捕捉到RLTS,也很难将其可视化。尽管在实验中缺乏RLTS明确的分子结构,但我们仍然可以通过测量同位素对反应速率的影响来追踪RLTS独特的“指纹”。这组“指纹”被认为是RLTS最直接的探针。相比之下,对于计算机模拟,通常可以在计算机屏幕上精确地可视化许多过渡态(TS)的分子结构,然而,理论学家并不确定哪个TS是实际的限速过渡态。因此,这为确定RLTS的结构以及反应机理,在实验和理论之间进行完美的“结合”提供了一个绝佳的舞台,即实验人员负责“指纹识别”,而理论学家负责提供与“指纹”匹配的候选结构。在这篇综述中,分别从经典世界和量子世界的角度讨论了化学反应中同位素效应的起源(例如,逆动力学同位素效应和所有平衡同位素效应的起源纯粹来自量子)。还介绍了用于同位素效应计算的传统比格莱森方程,以及在费曼路径积分和克莱纳特变分微扰(KP)理论框架下的改进版本,用于系统地纳入非谐性和(非抛物线型)量子隧穿。此外,通过应用于生化反应,即细菌角鲨烯到藿烯多环化模型和RNA 2'-O-转磷酸化,展示了理论与实验之间出色的相互作用,成功推导出RLTS结构和反应机理。对于所有这些应用,我们使用了基于KP理论最近开发的路径积分方法,称为自动无积分路径积分(AIF-PI)方法,来进行同位素效应的从头算路径积分计算。与传统的路径积分分子动力学(PIMD)和蒙特卡罗(PIMC)模拟不同,我们的AIF-PI路径积分方法计算得到的值可以与计算机的数值精度一样精确(并非一样准确)。最后,对匹配RLTS实验“指纹”的候选结构理论建模中的一般挑战进行了评论。本文是名为:理论与实验中的酶过渡态的特刊的一部分。