Roberts Larry E, Bosnyak Daniel J, Bruce Ian C, Gander Phillip E, Paul Brandon T
Department of Psychology, Neuroscience, and Behaviour, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada; McMaster Institute for Music and the Mind, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Department of Psychology, Neuroscience, and Behaviour, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada; McMaster Institute for Music and the Mind, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada; Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Hear Res. 2015 Sep;327:9-27. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2015.04.011. Epub 2015 Apr 30.
It has been proposed that tinnitus is generated by aberrant neural activity that develops among neurons in tonotopic of regions of primary auditory cortex (A1) affected by hearing loss, which is also the frequency region where tinnitus percepts localize (Eggermont and Roberts 2004; Roberts et al., 2010, 2013). These models suggest (1) that differences between tinnitus and control groups of similar age and audiometric function should depend on whether A1 is probed in tinnitus frequency region (TFR) or below it, and (2) that brain responses evoked from A1 should track changes in the tinnitus percept when residual inhibition (RI) is induced by forward masking. We tested these predictions by measuring (128-channel EEG) the sound-evoked 40-Hz auditory steady-state response (ASSR) known to localize tonotopically to neural sources in A1. For comparison the N1 transient response localizing to distributed neural sources in nonprimary cortex (A2) was also studied. When tested under baseline conditions where tinnitus subjects would have heard their tinnitus, ASSR responses were larger in a tinnitus group than in controls when evoked by 500 Hz probes while the reverse was true for tinnitus and control groups tested with 5 kHz probes, confirming frequency-dependent group differences in this measure. On subsequent trials where RI was induced by masking (narrow band noise centered at 5 kHz), ASSR amplitude increased in the tinnitus group probed at 5 kHz but not in the tinnitus group probed at 500 Hz. When collapsed into a single sample tinnitus subjects reporting comparatively greater RI depth and duration showed comparatively larger ASSR increases after masking regardless of probe frequency. Effects of masking on ASSR amplitude in the control groups were completely reversed from those in the tinnitus groups, with no change seen to 5 kHz probes but ASSR increases to 500 Hz probes even though the masking sound contained no energy at 500 Hz (an "off-frequency" masking effect). In contrast to these findings for the ASSR, N1 amplitude was larger in tinnitus than control groups at both probe frequencies under baseline conditions, decreased after masking in all conditions, and did not relate to RI. These results suggest that aberrant neural activity occurring in the TFR of A1 underlies tinnitus and its modulation during RI. They indicate further that while neural changes occur in A2 in tinnitus, these changes do not reflect the tinnitus percept. Models for tinnitus and forward masking are described that integrate these findings within a common framework.
有人提出,耳鸣是由原发性听觉皮层(A1)受听力损失影响的音调定位区域的神经元之间异常的神经活动产生的,这也是耳鸣感知定位的频率区域(埃格蒙特和罗伯茨,2004年;罗伯茨等人,2010年、2013年)。这些模型表明:(1)耳鸣组与年龄和听力功能相似的对照组之间的差异应取决于是否在耳鸣频率区域(TFR)或其以下探测A1;(2)当通过前向掩蔽诱导残余抑制(RI)时,从A1诱发的脑反应应跟踪耳鸣感知的变化。我们通过测量(128通道脑电图)已知在A1中音调定位到神经源的40赫兹听觉稳态反应(ASSR)来检验这些预测。为了进行比较,还研究了定位到非初级皮层(A2)中分布式神经源的N1瞬态反应。在耳鸣受试者会听到耳鸣的基线条件下进行测试时,当用500赫兹探头诱发时,耳鸣组的ASSR反应比对照组大,而在用5千赫兹探头测试的耳鸣组和对照组中情况则相反,证实了该测量中存在频率依赖性组间差异。在随后通过掩蔽(以5千赫兹为中心的窄带噪声)诱导RI的试验中,在5千赫兹探测的耳鸣组中ASSR幅度增加,而在500赫兹探测的耳鸣组中则没有增加。当汇总为单个样本时,报告相对更大RI深度和持续时间的耳鸣受试者在掩蔽后显示出相对更大的ASSR增加,无论探头频率如何。掩蔽对对照组ASSR幅度的影响与耳鸣组完全相反,5千赫兹探头没有变化,但ASSR对500赫兹探头增加,尽管掩蔽声在500赫兹处没有能量(“离频”掩蔽效应)。与这些ASSR的发现相反,在基线条件下,两个探头频率下耳鸣组的N1幅度均大于对照组,在所有条件下掩蔽后均降低,且与RI无关。这些结果表明,A1的TFR中发生的异常神经活动是耳鸣及其在RI期间调制的基础。它们进一步表明,虽然耳鸣时A2中发生了神经变化,但这些变化并不反映耳鸣感知。描述了耳鸣和前向掩蔽的模型,这些模型将这些发现整合在一个共同的框架内。