Paul Brandon T, Bruce Ian C, Roberts Larry E
Department of Psychology, Neuroscience, & Behaviour, McMaster University, 1280 Main St. West, Hamilton, ON, L8S 4K1, Canada.
Department of Psychology, Neuroscience, & Behaviour, McMaster University, 1280 Main St. West, Hamilton, ON, L8S 4K1, Canada; Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, McMaster University, 1280 Main St. West, Hamilton, ON, L8S 4K1, Canada.
Hear Res. 2017 Feb;344:170-182. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2016.11.010. Epub 2016 Nov 23.
Damage to auditory nerve fibers that expresses with suprathreshold sounds but is hidden from the audiogram has been proposed to underlie deficits in temporal coding ability observed among individuals with otherwise normal hearing, and to be present in individuals experiencing chronic tinnitus with clinically normal audiograms. We tested whether these individuals may have hidden synaptic losses on auditory nerve fibers with low spontaneous rates of firing (low-SR fibers) that are important for coding suprathreshold sounds in noise while high-SR fibers determining threshold responses in quiet remain relatively unaffected. Tinnitus and control subjects were required to detect the presence of amplitude modulation (AM) in a 5 kHz, suprathreshold tone (a frequency in the tinnitus frequency region of the tinnitus subjects, whose audiometric thresholds were normal to 12 kHz). The AM tone was embedded within background noise intended to degrade the contribution of high-SR fibers, such that AM coding was preferentially reliant on low-SR fibers. We also recorded by electroencephalography the "envelope following response" (EFR, generated in the auditory midbrain) to a 5 kHz, 85 Hz AM tone presented in the same background noise, and also in quiet (both low-SR and high-SR fibers contributing to AM coding in the latter condition). Control subjects with EFRs that were comparatively resistant to the addition of background noise had better AM detection thresholds than controls whose EFRs were more affected by noise. Simulated auditory nerve responses to our stimulus conditions using a well-established peripheral model suggested that low-SR fibers were better preserved in the former cases. Tinnitus subjects had worse AM detection thresholds and reduced EFRs overall compared to controls. Simulated auditory nerve responses found that in addition to severe low-SR fiber loss, a degree of high-SR fiber loss that would not be expected to affect audiometric thresholds was needed to explain the results in tinnitus subjects. The results indicate that hidden hearing loss could be sufficient to account for impaired temporal coding in individuals with normal audiograms as well as for cases of tinnitus without audiometric hearing loss.
有人提出,听神经纤维的损伤在听力学图上表现为阈值以上声音时出现,但难以察觉,这是听力正常个体中观察到的时间编码能力缺陷的基础,并且存在于听力图临床正常但患有慢性耳鸣的个体中。我们测试了这些个体的低自发放电率听神经纤维(低SR纤维)上是否可能存在隐藏的突触损失,这些纤维对于在噪声中编码阈值以上声音很重要,而决定安静时阈值反应的高SR纤维相对未受影响。耳鸣和对照受试者需要在5kHz的阈值以上音调(耳鸣受试者耳鸣频率区域内的频率,其听力阈值在12kHz以内正常)中检测幅度调制(AM)的存在。AM音调嵌入旨在降低高SR纤维贡献的背景噪声中,使得AM编码优先依赖于低SR纤维。我们还通过脑电图记录了在相同背景噪声以及安静环境中(在后者情况下,低SR和高SR纤维均对AM编码有贡献)呈现的5kHz、85Hz AM音调的“包络跟随反应”(EFR,在听觉中脑产生)。EFR对背景噪声添加相对抗性的对照受试者比EFR受噪声影响更大的对照受试者具有更好的AM检测阈值。使用成熟的外周模型模拟我们刺激条件下的听神经反应表明,在前者情况下低SR纤维保存得更好。与对照相比,耳鸣受试者的AM检测阈值总体更差且EFR降低。模拟听神经反应发现,除了严重的低SR纤维损失外,还需要一定程度的高SR纤维损失(预计不会影响听力阈值)来解释耳鸣受试者的结果。结果表明,隐藏性听力损失足以解释听力图正常个体的时间编码受损以及无听力阈值损失的耳鸣病例。