Suppr超能文献

前瞻性、随机、多国前列腺尿道 lifts 与经尿道前列腺切除术比较的研究:BPH6 研究 12 个月结果。

Prospective, randomized, multinational study of prostatic urethral lift versus transurethral resection of the prostate: 12-month results from the BPH6 study.

机构信息

Department of Urology, Herlev Hospital, Herlev, Denmark.

Frimley Park Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Surrey, UK.

出版信息

Eur Urol. 2015 Oct;68(4):643-52. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.04.024. Epub 2015 Apr 30.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) is considered the gold standard for male lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). However, TURP may lead to sexual dysfunction and incontinence, and has a long recovery period. Prostatic urethral lift (PUL) is a treatment option that may overcome these limitations.

OBJECTIVE

To compare PUL to TURP with regard to LUTS improvement, recovery, worsening of erectile and ejaculatory function, continence and safety (BPH6).

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Prospective, randomized, controlled trial at 10 European centers involving 80 men with BPH LUTS.

INTERVENTION

PUL or TURP.

OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

The BPH6 responder endpoint assesses symptom relief, quality of recovery, erectile function preservation, ejaculatory function preservation, continence preservation, and safety. Noninferiority was evaluated using a one-sided lower 95% confidence limit for the difference between PUL and TURP performance.

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS

Preservation of ejaculation and quality of recovery were superior with PUL (p<0.01). Significant symptom relief was achieved in both treatment arms. The study demonstrated not only noninferiority but also superiority of PUL over TURP on the BPH6 endpoint. Study limitations were the small sample size and the inability to blind participants to enrollment arm.

CONCLUSIONS

Assessment of individual BPH6 elements revealed that PUL was superior to TURP with respect to quality of recovery and preservation of ejaculatory function. PUL was superior to TURP according to the novel BPH6 responder endpoint, which needs to be validated in future studies.

PATIENT SUMMARY

In this study, participants who underwent prostatic urethral lift responded significantly better than those who underwent transurethral resection of the prostate as therapy for benign prostatic hyperplasia with regard to important aspects of quality of life.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01533038.

摘要

背景

经尿道前列腺切除术(TURP)被认为是治疗良性前列腺增生(BPH)引起的男性下尿路症状(LUTS)的金标准。然而,TURP 可能导致性功能障碍和尿失禁,并具有较长的恢复期。前列腺尿道抬高术(PUL)是一种可能克服这些局限性的治疗选择。

目的

比较 PUL 与 TURP 在改善 LUTS、恢复、勃起和射精功能恶化、控尿和安全性方面的效果(BPH6)。

设计、地点和参与者:在欧洲的 10 个中心进行的前瞻性、随机、对照试验,涉及 80 名患有 BPH LUTS 的男性。

干预

PUL 或 TURP。

结果测量和统计分析

BPH6 应答终点评估症状缓解、恢复质量、勃起功能保存、射精功能保存、控尿保存和安全性。使用 PUL 和 TURP 性能差异的单侧 95%置信下限评估非劣效性。

结果和局限性

PUL 保留射精和恢复质量更好(p<0.01)。两种治疗方法都显著缓解了症状。该研究不仅证明了 PUL 在 BPH6 终点上的非劣效性,而且还证明了其优于 TURP。研究的局限性是样本量小,无法对参与者进行分组盲法。

结论

对个体 BPH6 要素的评估表明,PUL 在恢复质量和射精功能保留方面优于 TURP。根据新的 BPH6 应答终点,PUL 优于 TURP,这需要在未来的研究中验证。

患者总结

在这项研究中,与接受经尿道前列腺切除术的患者相比,接受前列腺尿道抬高术的患者在生活质量的重要方面对良性前列腺增生的治疗反应明显更好。

临床试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01533038。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验