Broos Pieter P H L, Stokmans Rutger A, van Sterkenburg Steven M M, Torsello Giovanni, Vermassen Frank, Cuypers Philippe W M, van Sambeek Marc R H M, Teijink Joep A W
Department of Vascular Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands; Department of Epidemiology, CAPHRI Research School, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Department of Vascular Surgery, Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem, The Netherlands.
J Vasc Surg. 2015 Aug;62(2):312-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2015.03.024. Epub 2015 May 1.
This study aimed to compare perioperative and postoperative outcomes after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) in patients with various neck morphologic features.
Data from the Endurant Stent Graft Natural Selection Global Postmarket Registry (ENGAGE) were used for the analyses. Patients were categorized into three different groups according to proximal aortic neck anatomy: regular (REG), intermediate (INT), and challenging (CHA). REG was defined as AAAs with a proximal neck ≥15 mm combined with a suprarenal angulation (α) ≤45 degrees and an infrarenal neck angulation (ß) ≤60 degrees. INT was defined as AAAs with a proximal neck of 10 to 15 mm combined with α ≤45 degrees and ß ≤60 degrees or with a proximal neck of >15 mm combined with α ≤60 degrees and ß = 60 to 75 degrees or α = 45 to 60 degrees and ß ≤75 degrees. CHA was defined as infrarenal necks that exceed at least one of the three defining factors.
Overall, 925 patients (75.9%) had REG anatomy, 189 patients (15.5%) had INT anatomy, and 104 patients (8.5%) had CHA anatomy. Patient demographics and risk factors were similar. There was a significant difference in AAA diameter between the REG and CHA groups (59.4 mm vs 65.2 mm; P < .001). Technical success was similar among groups (REG 99.1% vs INT 99.5% vs CHA 97.1%). There were no differences in mortality or the need for secondary procedures within 30 days or at 1 year. A significantly higher rate of type I endoleaks within 30 days was seen in CHA compared with REG (adjusted odds ratio, 0.15; 95% confidence interval, 0.05-0.46) and INT (adjusted odds ratio, 0.08; 95% confidence interval, 0.01-0.70), but there was no difference at 1-year follow-up.
This real-world, global experience shows promising results and indicates that endovascular AAA repair with the Endurant stent graft (Medtronic Vascular, Santa Rosa, Calif) is safe and effective in patients with challenging aortic neck anatomy. However, long-term follow-up of patients is required to confirm results.
本研究旨在比较不同颈部形态特征患者行腹主动脉瘤(AAA)血管腔内修复术后的围手术期及术后结果。
分析来自Endurant支架移植物自然选择全球上市后注册研究(ENGAGE)的数据。根据主动脉近端颈部解剖结构将患者分为三组:常规组(REG)、中间组(INT)和复杂组(CHA)。REG定义为近端颈部≥15 mm,同时肾上段成角(α)≤45度且肾下段颈部成角(ß)≤60度的AAA。INT定义为近端颈部为10至15 mm,同时α≤45度且ß≤60度,或近端颈部>15 mm,同时α≤60度且ß = 60至75度,或α = 45至60度且ß≤75度的AAA。CHA定义为肾下段颈部至少超过三个定义因素中的一个。
总体而言,925例患者(75.9%)为REG解剖结构,189例患者(15.5%)为INT解剖结构,104例患者(8.5%)为CHA解剖结构。患者人口统计学和危险因素相似。REG组和CHA组的AAA直径存在显著差异(59.4 mm对65.2 mm;P <.001)。各组技术成功率相似(REG为99.1%,INT为99.5%,CHA为97.1%)。30天内或1年内的死亡率或二次手术需求无差异。与REG组(调整优势比,0.15;95%置信区间,0.05 - 0.46)和INT组(调整优势比,0.08;95%置信区间,0.01 - 0.