Lyden Patrick
Department of Neurology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, 127 S. San Vicente Blvd., AHSP A6417, Los Angeles, CA 90036, USA.
Expert Rev Neurother. 2015 Jun;15(6):571-4. doi: 10.1586/14737175.2015.1041510. Epub 2015 May 4.
Intravenous rt-PA was proven safe and effective for acute ischemic stroke in 1995, approved by US FDA in 1996, and endorsed by the American Heart Association, American Academy of Neurology, and National Stroke Association in 1997. The treatment is remarkably cost-effective, despite the high cost of the drug itself and the stroke teams to give it. Community-based practicing neurologists can use t-PA for acute stroke without the need for specialized expertise. The benefit is durable over long-term follow-up and no particular subgroups, such as the elderly or those with very large strokes, should be excluded from treatment. Several additional studies have now confirmed the beneficial effects of thrombolytic therapy for stroke in de novo samples. So why isn't the drug used more? Some troubling mis-understandings in the literature seem persistent and influential among clinicians. Considerable data supports the use of rt-PA for acute ischemic stroke, which should remove remaining doubts.
静脉注射重组组织型纤溶酶原激活剂(rt-PA)在1995年被证明对急性缺血性中风安全有效,1996年获美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)批准,1997年得到美国心脏协会、美国神经病学学会和美国中风协会认可。尽管药物本身成本高昂且需要配备中风治疗团队,但这种治疗方法具有显著的成本效益。社区执业神经科医生无需专业技能就能使用t-PA治疗急性中风。长期随访显示该治疗效果持久,不应将任何特定亚组(如老年人或中风面积很大的患者)排除在治疗之外。现在有几项其他研究证实了溶栓治疗对新样本中风患者的有益效果。那么为什么这种药物没有得到更广泛的应用呢?文献中一些令人困扰的误解似乎在临床医生中持续存在并产生影响。大量数据支持使用rt-PA治疗急性缺血性中风,这应该消除了尚存的疑虑。