Cardiac Surgery, Universitaire Ziekenhuizen Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium.
Cardiac Surgery, Universitaire Ziekenhuizen Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015 Jul;150(1):84-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2015.03.040. Epub 2015 Mar 31.
A prospective trial was designed to evaluate the feasibility of the Perceval sutureless aortic valve. We report the 5-year clinical and hemodynamic outcome.
A total of 30 patients (mean age: 80.4 ± 3.8 years; mean logistic European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation [euroSCORE]: 13.2 ± 7.3) received the valve in 3 European centers, between April 2007 and February 2008. Cumulative follow-up was 92.67 patient-years, with a median of 4.2 years. Patients with a small annulus were selected because only sizes 21 and 23 mm (covering annuli diameters from 19 to 23 mm) were available at this early stage of the trial. In 37% of the patients, a 21-mm valve was used; 63% received a 23-mm valve; 14 patients had concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting. Clinical and hemodynamic follow-up evaluation were performed annually, including echocardiography.
Procedural success was 100%. Cardiopulmonary bypass time and cross-clamp time in isolated aortic valve replacement were 46.4 ± 6.7 minutes and 29.3 ± 8.0 minutes, respectively. One patient died during the hospital stay. Postoperative complications included 1 patient with mediastinal bleeding, and 1 with atrioventricular block that led to pacemaker implantation. No stroke occurred in either the early or late period. At the last available follow-up, 22 patients were alive. The mean gradient was 9.3 mm Hg, with an effective orifice area of 1.7 cm(2) at 5 years. No dislodgement, structural valve deterioration, hemolysis, or valve thrombosis was reported.
This study reports the first and longest experience with a truly sutureless valve, evaluating implantation feasibility and valve safety. Results from up to 5 years of follow up confirmed the performance and safety of this device, even in a medium- to high-risk patient population with a small aortic annulus.
设计了一项前瞻性试验,以评估 Perceval 无缝线主动脉瓣的可行性。我们报告了 5 年的临床和血液动力学结果。
2007 年 4 月至 2008 年 2 月期间,3 个欧洲中心共收治了 30 例患者(平均年龄:80.4 ± 3.8 岁;平均逻辑欧洲心脏手术风险评估系统 [euroSCORE]:13.2 ± 7.3)。累积随访时间为 92.67 患者年,中位随访时间为 4.2 年。选择小瓣环的患者是因为在试验的早期阶段只有 21 和 23 毫米的瓣膜(覆盖 19 至 23 毫米的瓣环直径)。37%的患者使用 21 毫米的瓣膜;63%的患者使用 23 毫米的瓣膜;14 例患者同时进行了冠状动脉旁路移植术。每年进行临床和血液动力学随访评估,包括超声心动图。
手术成功率为 100%。单纯主动脉瓣置换的体外循环时间和主动脉阻断时间分别为 46.4 ± 6.7 分钟和 29.3 ± 8.0 分钟。1 例患者在住院期间死亡。术后并发症包括 1 例纵隔出血和 1 例房室传导阻滞导致起搏器植入。在早期或晚期均未发生卒中。在最后一次可获得的随访中,22 例患者存活。平均梯度为 9.3mmHg,5 年时有效瓣口面积为 1.7cm²。未报告瓣膜脱位、结构性瓣膜退化、溶血或血栓形成。
本研究报告了首例也是最长的真正无缝线瓣膜的经验,评估了植入的可行性和瓣膜的安全性。长达 5 年的随访结果证实了该装置的性能和安全性,即使在中高危患者群体中,瓣环较小也是如此。