Wysocki Andrea, Butler Mary, Kane Robert L, Kane Rosalie A, Shippee Tetyana, Sainfort François
a Researcher, Mathematica Policy Research , Washington , DC , USA.
J Aging Soc Policy. 2015;27(3):255-79. doi: 10.1080/08959420.2015.1024545.
Despite a shift from institutional services toward more home and community-based services (HCBS) for older adults who need long-term services and supports (LTSS), the effects of HCBS have yet to be adequately synthesized in the literature. This review of literature from 1995 to 2012 compares the outcome trajectories of older adults served through HCBS (including assisted living [AL]) and in nursing homes (NHs) for physical function, cognition, mental health, mortality, use of acute care, and associated harms (e.g., accidents, abuse, and neglect) and costs. NH and AL residents did not differ in physical function, cognition, mental health, and mortality outcomes. The differences in harms between HCBS recipients and NH residents were mixed. Evidence was insufficient for cost comparisons. More and better research is needed to draw robust conclusions about how the service setting influences the outcomes and costs of LTSS for older adults. Future research should address the numerous methodological challenges present in this field of research and should emphasize studies evaluating the effectiveness of HCBS.
尽管对于需要长期服务与支持(LTSS)的老年人,服务模式已从机构服务转向更多基于家庭和社区的服务(HCBS),但HCBS的效果在文献中尚未得到充分综合阐述。本项对1995年至2012年文献的综述,比较了通过HCBS(包括辅助生活[AL])接受服务的老年人与在疗养院(NHs)接受服务的老年人在身体功能、认知、心理健康、死亡率、急性护理使用情况以及相关危害(如事故、虐待和忽视)和成本方面的结局轨迹。NH和AL居民在身体功能、认知、心理健康和死亡率结局方面没有差异。HCBS接受者与NH居民在危害方面的差异不一。成本比较的证据不足。需要进行更多更好的研究,以就服务环境如何影响老年人LTSS的结局和成本得出有力结论。未来的研究应解决该研究领域中存在的众多方法学挑战,并应强调评估HCBS有效性的研究。