Kaye H Stephen, Harrington Charlene
Institute for Health & Aging, University of California San Francisco, 3333 California Street, Suite 340, San Francisco, CA 94118, USA.
Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, University of California San Francisco, USA.
Disabil Health J. 2015 Jan;8(1):3-8. doi: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2014.09.003. Epub 2014 Sep 28.
Researchers, policy experts, and advocates participating in an invitational conference discussed research needed to address pressing policy issues in long-term services and supports (LTSS). Future research on need for LTSS should focus on projections of need, geographic variations, equity, and unmet needs of consumers and caregivers. Research on access to home- and community-based services (HCBS) should address progress in rebalancing LTSS in favor of HCBS, cost-containment strategies, the shift to managed LTSS, and the performance of managed care organizations. Major gaps in research on LTSS costs and quality center on both comparative costs and cost-effectiveness of HCBS versus institutional programs, cost savings of managed LTSS versus fee-for-service, performance incentives in managed LTSS, and LTSS quality and outcome measurement. Research on workers and caregivers could focus on worker availability, improving job quality, worker training standards, the impact of paying family members to provide LTSS, and the private-pay LTSS workforce.
参加一场邀请会议的研究人员、政策专家和倡导者讨论了应对长期服务与支持(LTSS)中紧迫政策问题所需的研究。未来关于LTSS需求的研究应聚焦于需求预测、地理差异、公平性以及消费者和照护者未满足的需求。关于获得居家和社区服务(HCBS)的研究应探讨在使LTSS向有利于HCBS方向重新平衡方面取得的进展、成本控制策略、向管理式LTSS的转变以及管理式医疗组织的绩效。LTSS成本和质量研究中的主要差距集中在HCBS与机构项目的比较成本和成本效益、管理式LTSS与按服务收费相比的成本节约、管理式LTSS中的绩效激励措施以及LTSS质量和结果测量。关于工作人员和照护者的研究可聚焦于工作人员的可获得性、改善工作质量、工作人员培训标准、支付家庭成员提供LTSS的影响以及自费LTSS劳动力。