Young S K, Markowitz N R, Sullivan S, Seale T W, Hirschi R
University of Oklahoma College of Dentistry.
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1989 Dec;68(6):740-7. doi: 10.1016/0030-4220(89)90165-5.
Very few cases of gigantiform cementoma have been reported, and those associated with a positive family history are especially rare. Confusion exists about the relationship of gigantiform cementoma to florid osseous dysplasia, cementifying fibroma, and diffuse chronic sclerosing osteomyelitis. It has been unclear whether gigantiform cementoma should be accorded the status of a separate entity. In this article, we report our findings on a family that, over five generations, has exhibited clinical, radiographic, and/or histologic findings consistent with the designation familial gigantiform cementoma. This pedigree consists of 55 members. Significant heterogeneity in expression of this trait was noted. The pattern of occurrence of the trait is consistent with an autosomal dominant mode of inheritance with variable expressivity of the phenotype. We suggest that familial gigantiform cementoma should be recognized as a separate entity.
巨大型牙骨质瘤的病例报告极少,而那些与阳性家族史相关的病例尤为罕见。关于巨大型牙骨质瘤与 florid 骨发育异常、牙骨质化纤维瘤和弥漫性慢性硬化性骨髓炎之间的关系存在混淆。巨大型牙骨质瘤是否应被视为一个独立的实体尚不清楚。在本文中,我们报告了一个家族的研究结果,该家族五代人表现出与家族性巨大型牙骨质瘤诊断相符的临床、影像学和/或组织学特征。这个家系由 55 名成员组成。该性状表达存在显著的异质性。该性状的发生模式与常染色体显性遗传模式一致,表型具有可变的表达性。我们建议家族性巨大型牙骨质瘤应被视为一个独立的实体。