• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

重症监护病房研究伦理与针对无意识患者的试验。

Intensive care unit research ethics and trials on unconscious patients.

作者信息

Gillett G R

机构信息

Dunedin Hospital and Otago Bioethics Centre, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.

出版信息

Anaesth Intensive Care. 2015 May;43(3):309-12. doi: 10.1177/0310057X1504300304.

DOI:10.1177/0310057X1504300304
PMID:25943602
Abstract

There are widely acknowledged ethical issues in enrolling unconscious patients in research trials, particularly in intensive care unit (ICU) settings. An analysis of those issues shows that, by and large, patients are better served in units where research is actively taking place for several reasons: i) they do not fall prey to therapeutic prejudices without clear evidential support, ii) they get a chance of accessing new and potentially beneficial treatments, iii) a climate of careful monitoring of patients and their clinical progress is necessary for good clinical research and affects the care of all patients and iv) even those not in the treatment arm of a trial of a new intervention must receive best current standard care (according to international evidence-based treatment guidelines). Given that we have discovered a number of 'best practice' regimens of care that do not optimise outcomes in ICU settings, it is of great benefit to all patients (including those participating in research) that we are constantly updating and evaluating what we do. Therefore, the practice of ICU-based clinical research on patients, many of whom cannot give prospective informed consent, ticks all the ethical boxes and ought to be encouraged in our health system. It is very important that the evaluation of protocols for ICU research should not overlook obvious (albeit probabilistic) benefits to patients and the acceptability of responsible clinicians entering patients into well-designed trials, even though the ICU setting does not and cannot conform to typical informed consent procedures and requirements.

摘要

在研究试验中招募昏迷患者存在广泛公认的伦理问题,尤其是在重症监护病房(ICU)环境中。对这些问题的分析表明,总体而言,在积极开展研究的病房中,患者能得到更好的治疗,原因如下:i)他们不会成为没有明确证据支持的治疗偏见的受害者;ii)他们有机会获得新的、可能有益的治疗;iii)良好的临床研究需要对患者及其临床进展进行仔细监测的氛围,这也会影响所有患者的护理;iv)即使那些未参与新干预试验治疗组的患者也必须接受当前最佳标准护理(根据国际循证治疗指南)。鉴于我们已经发现一些“最佳实践”护理方案在ICU环境中并未优化治疗结果,不断更新和评估我们的做法对所有患者(包括参与研究的患者)都大有裨益。因此,对许多无法事先给予知情同意的患者开展基于ICU的临床研究的做法符合所有伦理标准,应该在我们的医疗系统中得到鼓励。非常重要的是,对ICU研究方案的评估不应忽视对患者明显(尽管是概率性的)益处以及负责的临床医生让患者参与精心设计试验的可接受性,尽管ICU环境不符合也无法符合典型的知情同意程序和要求。

相似文献

1
Intensive care unit research ethics and trials on unconscious patients.重症监护病房研究伦理与针对无意识患者的试验。
Anaesth Intensive Care. 2015 May;43(3):309-12. doi: 10.1177/0310057X1504300304.
2
Protecting participants of clinical trials conducted in the intensive care unit.保护重症监护病房临床试验的参与者。
J Intensive Care Med. 2011 Jul-Aug;26(4):237-49. doi: 10.1177/0885066610390867.
3
Research without informed patient consent in incompetent patients.在无行为能力患者中进行未经患者知情同意的研究。
Anaesth Intensive Care. 2015 May;43(3):313-6. doi: 10.1177/0310057X1504300305.
4
Research ethics and consent in the intensive care unit.重症监护病房中的研究伦理与知情同意
Curr Opin Crit Care. 2003 Dec;9(6):540-4. doi: 10.1097/00075198-200312000-00013.
5
Is the concept of informed consent applicable to clinical research involving critically ill patients?知情同意的概念是否适用于涉及重症患者的临床研究?
Crit Care Med. 2003 Mar;31(3 Suppl):S153-60. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000054901.80339.01.
6
Research ethics and the intensive care unit: getting behind the wheel.研究伦理与重症监护病房:掌控局面
Crit Care Med. 2003 Mar;31(3 Suppl):S119-20. doi: 10.1097/00003246-200303001-00001.
7
Doing research on the ethics of doing research.研究关于开展研究的伦理问题。
Crit Care. 2007;11(1):111; discussion 111. doi: 10.1186/cc5684.
8
American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement: oversight of clinical research.美国临床肿瘤学会政策声明:临床研究监督
J Clin Oncol. 2003 Jun 15;21(12):2377-86. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2003.04.026. Epub 2003 Apr 29.
9
National survey on the indicators of quality in Bioethics of the SEMICYUC in the departments of Intensive Care Medicine in Spain.西班牙重症监护医学系 SEMICYUC 生物伦理学质量指标全国调查。
Med Intensiva. 2017 Dec;41(9):523-531. doi: 10.1016/j.medin.2017.01.007. Epub 2017 Apr 25.
10
The ethical analysis of risk in intensive care unit research.重症监护病房研究中风险的伦理分析。
Crit Care. 2004 Apr;8(2):85-6. doi: 10.1186/cc2822. Epub 2004 Feb 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Ethical considerations in research involving ICU patients who lack capacity: navigating the updated Helsinki Declaration.涉及无行为能力的重症监护病房患者的研究中的伦理考量:解读更新后的《赫尔辛基宣言》
Intensive Care Med. 2025 Jan;51(1):146-149. doi: 10.1007/s00134-024-07732-w. Epub 2024 Dec 23.
2
Comparing Open-Access Database and Traditional Intensive Care Studies Using Machine Learning: Bibliometric Analysis Study.使用机器学习比较开放获取数据库和传统重症监护研究:文献计量分析研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Apr 17;26:e48330. doi: 10.2196/48330.
3
Informed Consent in COVID-19-Research: An Ethical Analysis of Clinical Studies Performed during the Pandemic.
新冠疫情研究中的知情同意:对疫情期间开展的临床研究的伦理分析
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Jun 17;11(12):1793. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11121793.
4
Learning from stakeholders to inform good practice guidance on consent to research in intensive care units: a mixed-methods study.从利益相关者处学习,为重症监护病房的研究同意提供良好实践指导:一项混合方法研究。
BMJ Open. 2022 Nov 14;12(11):e066149. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-066149.
5
Strategies to enhance recruitment and consent to intensive care studies: a qualitative study with researchers and patient-public involvement contributors.增强重症监护研究招募和同意的策略:一项针对研究人员和患者-公众参与贡献者的定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2021 Sep 22;11(9):e048193. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-048193.
6
Barriers and challenges in the process of including critically ill patients in clinical studies.纳入危重症患者参与临床研究的过程中的障碍和挑战。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2020 Jun 8;28(1):51. doi: 10.1186/s13049-020-00732-x.
7
Acceptability of a German multicentre healthcare research study: a survey of research personnels' attitudes, experiences and work load.一项德国多中心医疗保健研究的可接受性:对研究人员态度、经历和工作量的调查
BMJ Open. 2018 Sep 24;8(9):e023166. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023166.