Suppr超能文献

在确定法洛四联症修复术后反流的严重程度方面,使用背景校正相位对比磁共振成像时,肺反流容积比反流分数更具优势。

Pulmonary regurgitant volume is superior to fraction using background-corrected phase contrast MRI in determining the severity of regurgitation in repaired tetralogy of Fallot.

作者信息

Gorter Thomas M, van Melle Joost P, Freling Hendrik G, Ebels Tjark, Bartelds Beatrijs, Pieper Petronella G, Berger Rolf M F, van Veldhuisen Dirk J, Willems Tineke P

机构信息

Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, P.O. Box 30.001, 9700 RB, Groningen, The Netherlands,

出版信息

Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015 Aug;31(6):1169-77. doi: 10.1007/s10554-015-0670-6. Epub 2015 May 6.

Abstract

In the assessment of pulmonary regurgitation (PR) using phase contrast MRI, phase offset errors affect the accuracy of flow. This study evaluated the use of automated background correction for phase offset in the quantification of PR fraction and volume in patients with repaired tetralogy of Fallot (TOF), and to assess its clinical impact. We retrospectively analyzed 203 cardiac MRI studies, performed on 1.5-T scanner. Pulmonary flow (Q(P)) and systemic flow (Q(S)) was assessed both with and without background correction. Non-corrected and corrected Q(P) was correlated with Q(S). PR was correlated with (1) indexed right ventricular end-diastolic volume (RVEDVi) and (2) with differential right and left ventricular stroke volumes (PR(SV)). Both PR fraction and volume showed major change after correction (-43 to +36% and -13 to +13 ml/m(2)). Corrected Q(P) and Q(S) were stronger correlated with each other than non-corrected Q(P) and Q(S) [r = 0.78 vs. 0.73 (p < 0.001)]. Both PR fraction and volume were stronger correlated with RVEDVi, compared to their non-corrected counterparts (p < 0.001). PR volume was stronger correlated with RVEDVi, compared to PR fraction [r = 0.74 vs. 0.69 (p < 0.001)]. When patients were divided according to PR severity, 12% of patients reclassified after correction. Background correction for phase offset significantly changed the quantification of PR. Non-corrected assessment of PR may result in the misclassification of patients. Our data suggest that the use of PR volume is favourable in the follow-up of patients with repaired TOF.

摘要

在使用相位对比磁共振成像评估肺动脉反流(PR)时,相位偏移误差会影响血流测量的准确性。本研究评估了自动背景校正用于法洛四联症(TOF)修复术后患者PR分数和容积定量中相位偏移的情况,并评估其临床影响。我们回顾性分析了在1.5-T扫描仪上进行的203项心脏磁共振成像研究。在有和没有背景校正的情况下评估肺血流量(Q(P))和体循环血流量(Q(S))。未校正和校正后的Q(P)与Q(S)进行相关性分析。PR与(1)右心室舒张末期容积指数(RVEDVi)以及(2)左右心室每搏量差值(PR(SV))进行相关性分析。校正后PR分数和容积均有显著变化(-43%至+36%和-13至+13 ml/m²)。校正后的Q(P)和Q(S)之间的相关性比未校正的Q(P)和Q(S)更强[r = 0.78对0.73(p < 0.001)]。与未校正的情况相比,PR分数和容积与RVEDVi的相关性更强(p < 0.001)。与PR分数相比,PR容积与RVEDVi的相关性更强[r = 0.74对0.69(p < 0.001)]。当根据PR严重程度对患者进行分组时,12%的患者在校正后重新分类。相位偏移的背景校正显著改变了PR的定量。未校正的PR评估可能导致患者分类错误。我们的数据表明,在TOF修复术后患者的随访中使用PR容积更有利。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e66e/4486784/fc7d9ff3c0ca/10554_2015_670_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验