• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

心血管磁共振流量测量:多中心多厂家背景相位偏移误差研究,该误差可能会影响反流或分流流量测量的准确性。

Flow measurement by cardiovascular magnetic resonance: a multi-centre multi-vendor study of background phase offset errors that can compromise the accuracy of derived regurgitant or shunt flow measurements.

机构信息

CMR Unit, Royal Brompton Hospital, London, UK.

出版信息

J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2010 Jan 14;12(1):5. doi: 10.1186/1532-429X-12-5.

DOI:10.1186/1532-429X-12-5
PMID:20074359
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2818657/
Abstract

AIMS

Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) allows non-invasive phase contrast measurements of flow through planes transecting large vessels. However, some clinically valuable applications are highly sensitive to errors caused by small offsets of measured velocities if these are not adequately corrected, for example by the use of static tissue or static phantom correction of the offset error. We studied the severity of uncorrected velocity offset errors across sites and CMR systems.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In a multi-centre, multi-vendor study, breath-hold through-plane retrospectively ECG-gated phase contrast acquisitions, as are used clinically for aortic and pulmonary flow measurement, were applied to static gelatin phantoms in twelve 1.5 T CMR systems, using a velocity encoding range of 150 cm/s. No post-processing corrections of offsets were implemented. The greatest uncorrected velocity offset, taken as an average over a 'great vessel' region (30 mm diameter) located up to 70 mm in-plane distance from the magnet isocenter, ranged from 0.4 cm/s to 4.9 cm/s. It averaged 2.7 cm/s over all the planes and systems. By theoretical calculation, a velocity offset error of 0.6 cm/s (representing just 0.4% of a 150 cm/s velocity encoding range) is barely acceptable, potentially causing about 5% miscalculation of cardiac output and up to 10% error in shunt measurement.

CONCLUSION

In the absence of hardware or software upgrades able to reduce phase offset errors, all the systems tested appeared to require post-acquisition correction to achieve consistently reliable breath-hold measurements of flow. The effectiveness of offset correction software will still need testing with respect to clinical flow acquisitions.

摘要

目的

心血管磁共振(CMR)允许通过穿过横切大血管的平面进行非侵入性的相位对比测量流量。然而,如果未充分校正测量速度的小偏移,一些具有临床价值的应用会高度敏感于这些误差,例如使用静态组织或静态幻影校正偏移误差。我们研究了未校正速度偏移误差在不同地点和 CMR 系统中的严重程度。

方法和结果

在一项多中心、多供应商的研究中,使用 12 台 1.5 T CMR 系统对 150 cm/s 的速度编码范围进行了呼吸暂停通过平面回顾性 ECG 门控相位对比采集,用于测量主动脉和肺动脉流量,应用于静态明胶体模。未实施偏移的后处理校正。最大未校正速度偏移,作为位于距磁体等中心最多 70mm 平面距离内的“大血管”区域(30mm 直径)的平均值,范围为 0.4cm/s 至 4.9cm/s。所有平面和系统的平均值为 2.7cm/s。根据理论计算,0.6cm/s 的速度偏移误差(仅代表 150cm/s 速度编码范围的 0.4%)勉强可以接受,可能导致约 5%的心输出量计算错误和高达 10%的分流测量误差。

结论

在没有能够降低相位偏移误差的硬件或软件升级的情况下,所有测试的系统似乎都需要在采集后进行校正,以实现可靠的呼吸暂停流量测量。偏移校正软件的有效性仍需要针对临床流量采集进行测试。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/05e9/2818657/5dc4e89f35b5/1532-429X-12-5-5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/05e9/2818657/927e32540386/1532-429X-12-5-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/05e9/2818657/c96f9e5b1770/1532-429X-12-5-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/05e9/2818657/bf3763e1c6c9/1532-429X-12-5-3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/05e9/2818657/df89ad07931c/1532-429X-12-5-4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/05e9/2818657/5dc4e89f35b5/1532-429X-12-5-5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/05e9/2818657/927e32540386/1532-429X-12-5-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/05e9/2818657/c96f9e5b1770/1532-429X-12-5-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/05e9/2818657/bf3763e1c6c9/1532-429X-12-5-3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/05e9/2818657/df89ad07931c/1532-429X-12-5-4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/05e9/2818657/5dc4e89f35b5/1532-429X-12-5-5.jpg

相似文献

1
Flow measurement by cardiovascular magnetic resonance: a multi-centre multi-vendor study of background phase offset errors that can compromise the accuracy of derived regurgitant or shunt flow measurements.心血管磁共振流量测量:多中心多厂家背景相位偏移误差研究,该误差可能会影响反流或分流流量测量的准确性。
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2010 Jan 14;12(1):5. doi: 10.1186/1532-429X-12-5.
2
The clinical impact of phase offset errors and different correction methods in cardiovascular magnetic resonance phase contrast imaging: a multi-scanner study.相位偏移误差及其在心血管磁共振相位对比成像中不同校正方法的临床影响:多台扫描仪研究。
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2020 Sep 17;22(1):68. doi: 10.1186/s12968-020-00659-3.
3
In-vivo validation of interpolation-based phase offset correction in cardiovascular magnetic resonance flow quantification: a multi-vendor, multi-center study.基于内插的相位偏移校正在心血管磁共振流量定量中的体内验证:多供应商、多中心研究。
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2019 May 20;21(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s12968-019-0538-3.
4
Effect of protocol choice on phase contrast cardiac magnetic resonance flow measurement in the ascending aorta: breath-hold and non-breath-hold.协议选择对升主动脉相位对比心脏磁共振流量测量的影响:屏气和非屏气。
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013 Jan;29(1):113-20. doi: 10.1007/s10554-012-0047-z. Epub 2012 Apr 22.
5
Sequence optimization to reduce velocity offsets in cardiovascular magnetic resonance volume flow quantification--a multi-vendor study.序列优化以减少心血管磁共振容积流量定量中的速度偏移——一项多厂商研究。
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2011 Mar 9;13(1):18. doi: 10.1186/1532-429X-13-18.
6
A multi-center inter-manufacturer study of the temporal stability of phase-contrast velocity mapping background offset errors.一项关于相位对比速度映射背景偏移误差时变稳定性的多中心制造商间研究。
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2012 Oct 20;14(1):72. doi: 10.1186/1532-429X-14-72.
7
Flow measurement by magnetic resonance: a unique asset worth optimising.磁共振血流测量:一项值得优化的独特资产。
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2007;9(4):723-8. doi: 10.1080/10976640701465090.
8
Baseline correction of phase-contrast images in congenital cardiovascular magnetic resonance.先天性心血管磁共振相位对比图像的基线校正。
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2010 Mar 5;12(1):11. doi: 10.1186/1532-429X-12-11.
9
Cardiac 4D phase-contrast CMR at 9.4 T using self-gated ultra-short echo time (UTE) imaging.使用自门控超短回波时间(UTE)成像的9.4T心脏4D相衬磁共振成像。
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2017 Mar 31;19(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s12968-017-0351-9.
10
Baseline correction of phase contrast images improves quantification of blood flow in the great vessels.相位对比图像的基线校正可改善大血管中血流的定量分析。
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2007;9(4):681-5. doi: 10.1080/10976640601187588.

引用本文的文献

1
Increased contractility affects left ventricular kinetic energy in pulmonary hypertension.收缩性增强影响肺动脉高压患者的左心室动能。
Physiol Rep. 2025 Sep;13(17):e70563. doi: 10.14814/phy2.70563.
2
Automatic failure mode evaluation using non-linear phase contrast correction to improve flow measurement accuracy in cardiovascular magnetic resonance phase contrast imaging.使用非线性相位对比校正进行自动故障模式评估,以提高心血管磁共振相位对比成像中的血流测量准确性。
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2025;27(1):101895. doi: 10.1016/j.jocmr.2025.101895. Epub 2025 Apr 10.
3
Quantification of valvular regurgitation by transthoracic 3D high pulse repetition frequency Doppler echocardiography.

本文引用的文献

1
Improved accuracy in flow mapping of congenital heart disease using stationary phantom technique.应用静态体模技术提高先天性心脏病血流测绘的准确性。
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2009 Dec 10;11(1):52. doi: 10.1186/1532-429X-11-52.
2
The effects of breath-holding on pulmonary regurgitation measured by cardiovascular magnetic resonance velocity mapping.通过心血管磁共振速度成像测量屏气对肺动脉反流的影响。
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2009 Jan 14;11(1):1. doi: 10.1186/1532-429X-11-1.
3
Normal thoracic aorta diameter on cardiac computed tomography in healthy asymptomatic adults: impact of age and gender.
经胸三维高脉冲重复频率多普勒超声心动图对瓣膜反流的定量分析。
Eur Heart J Imaging Methods Pract. 2024 Dec 18;2(3):qyae138. doi: 10.1093/ehjimp/qyae138. eCollection 2024 Jul.
4
Background phase induced steady-state effects in velocity quantification using phase-contrast MRI.背景期在使用相位对比磁共振成像进行速度定量分析时会引起稳态效应。
Magn Reson Med. 2025 Apr;93(4):1690-1699. doi: 10.1002/mrm.30358. Epub 2024 Oct 24.
5
Phase contrast MRI with minimized background phase errors.背景相位误差最小化的相衬磁共振成像。
Magn Reson Med. 2025 Mar;93(3):1104-1116. doi: 10.1002/mrm.30336. Epub 2024 Oct 14.
6
Flow inefficiencies in non-obstructive HCM revealed by kinetic energy and hemodynamic forces on 4D-flow CMR.通过四维血流心脏磁共振成像的动能和血流动力学力揭示的非梗阻性肥厚型心肌病中的血流低效情况。
Eur Heart J Imaging Methods Pract. 2024 Jul 16;2(3):qyae074. doi: 10.1093/ehjimp/qyae074. eCollection 2024 Jul.
7
The Role of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Assessment of Mitral Regurgitation.心血管磁共振成像在二尖瓣反流评估中的作用。
Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Mar 19;14(6):644. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14060644.
8
Assessment of the Severity of Aortic Regurgitation by Noninvasive Imaging : Non-invasive MMI for AR.通过非侵入性成像评估主动脉反流的严重程度:用于主动脉反流的非侵入性心肌运动指数
Curr Cardiol Rep. 2024 Jan;26(1):1-14. doi: 10.1007/s11886-023-02011-4. Epub 2023 Dec 13.
9
Multimodality Imaging Assessment of Tetralogy of Fallot: From Diagnosis to Long-Term Follow-Up.法洛四联症的多模态成像评估:从诊断到长期随访
Children (Basel). 2023 Oct 27;10(11):1747. doi: 10.3390/children10111747.
10
Flow evaluation software for four-dimensional flow MRI: a reliability and validation study.四维血流磁共振成像的血流评估软件:可靠性和验证研究。
Radiol Med. 2023 Oct;128(10):1225-1235. doi: 10.1007/s11547-023-01697-4. Epub 2023 Aug 24.
健康无症状成年人心脏计算机断层扫描中正常胸主动脉直径:年龄和性别的影响。
Acad Radiol. 2008 Jul;15(7):827-34. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2008.02.001.
4
Baseline correction of phase contrast images improves quantification of blood flow in the great vessels.相位对比图像的基线校正可改善大血管中血流的定量分析。
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2007;9(4):681-5. doi: 10.1080/10976640601187588.
5
Severity of mitral and aortic regurgitation as assessed by cardiovascular magnetic resonance: optimizing correlation with Doppler echocardiography.通过心血管磁共振评估二尖瓣和主动脉瓣反流的严重程度:优化与多普勒超声心动图的相关性
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2006;8(3):503-7. doi: 10.1080/10976640600604856.
6
Correction of phase offset errors in main pulmonary artery flow quantification.主肺动脉血流定量中相位偏移误差的校正。
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2005 Jul;22(1):73-9. doi: 10.1002/jmri.20361.
7
Evaluation of intracardiac shunts with cardiac magnetic resonance.利用心脏磁共振成像评估心内分流
Curr Cardiol Rep. 2005 Jan;7(1):52-8. doi: 10.1007/s11886-005-0011-9.
8
Quantification of shunt volumes in congenital heart diseases using a breath-hold MR phase contrast technique--comparison with oximetry.使用屏气磁共振相位对比技术定量分析先天性心脏病的分流容积——与血氧测定法的比较
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2002 Feb;18(1):53-60. doi: 10.1023/a:1014394626363.
9
Concomitant gradient terms in phase contrast MR: analysis and correction.相位对比磁共振成像中的伴随梯度项:分析与校正
Magn Reson Med. 1998 Feb;39(2):300-8. doi: 10.1002/mrm.1910390218.
10
Comparison between retrospective gating and ECG triggering in magnetic resonance velocity mapping.磁共振速度成像中回顾性门控与心电图触发的比较。
Magn Reson Imaging. 1993;11(4):533-7. doi: 10.1016/0730-725x(93)90472-p.