• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

绩效薪酬对患有多种慢性病的患者有益吗?来自全民医保体系的证据。

Does pay-for-performance benefit patients with multiple chronic conditions? Evidence from a universal coverage health care system.

作者信息

Chen Chi-Chen, Cheng Shou-Hsia

机构信息

Department of Public Health, College of Medicine, Fu Jen Catholic University, Taipei, Taiwan and.

Institute of Health Policy and Management, College of Public Health, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan

出版信息

Health Policy Plan. 2016 Feb;31(1):83-90. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czv024. Epub 2015 May 5.

DOI:10.1093/heapol/czv024
PMID:25944704
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Numerous studies have examined the impact of pay-for-performance (P4P) programmes, yet little is known regarding their effects on continuity of care (COC) and the role of multiple chronic conditions (MCCs). This study aimed to examine the effects of a P4P programme for diabetes care on health care provision, COC and health care outcomes in diabetic patients with and without comorbid hypertension.

METHODS

This study utilized a large-scale natural experiment with a 4-year follow-up period under a compulsory universal health insurance programme in Taiwan. The intervention groups consisted of patients with diabetes who were enrolled in the P4P programme in 2005. The comparison groups were selected via propensity score matching with patients who were seen by the same group of physicians. A difference-in-differences analysis was conducted using generalized estimating equation models to examine the effects of the P4P programme.

RESULTS

Significant impacts were observed after the implementation of the P4P programme for diabetic patients with and without hypertension. The programme increased the number of necessary examinations/tests and improved the COC between patients and their physicians. The programme significantly reduced the likelihood of diabetes-related hospital admissions and emergency department visits [odds ratio (OR): 0.71; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.63-0.80 for diabetic patients with hypertension; OR: 0.74; 95% CI: 0.64-0.86 for patients without hypertension]. However, the effects of the P4P programme diminished to some extent in the second year after its implementation.

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that a financial incentive programme may improve the provision of necessary health care, COC and health care outcomes for diabetic patients both with and without comorbid hypertension. Health authorities could develop policies to increase participation in P4P programmes and encourage continued improvement in health care outcomes.

摘要

引言

众多研究探讨了按绩效付费(P4P)项目的影响,但对于其对医疗连续性(COC)的影响以及多重慢性病(MCCs)的作用却知之甚少。本研究旨在探讨糖尿病护理的P4P项目对有或无合并高血压的糖尿病患者的医疗服务提供、COC及医疗结果的影响。

方法

本研究利用台湾强制性全民健康保险项目下为期4年随访期的大规模自然实验。干预组由2005年参加P4P项目的糖尿病患者组成。通过倾向得分匹配法,从由同一组医生诊治的患者中选取对照组。使用广义估计方程模型进行差分分析,以检验P4P项目的效果。

结果

在实施P4P项目后,有或无高血压的糖尿病患者均观察到显著影响。该项目增加了必要检查/测试的次数,并改善了患者与其医生之间的COC。该项目显著降低了糖尿病相关住院和急诊就诊的可能性[比值比(OR):0.71;95%置信区间(CI):对于合并高血压的糖尿病患者为0.63 - 0.80;OR:0.74;95% CI:对于无高血压患者为0.64 - 0.86]。然而,P4P项目的效果在实施后的第二年有所减弱。

结论

本研究表明,一项经济激励项目可能改善有或无合并高血压的糖尿病患者必要医疗服务的提供、COC及医疗结果。卫生当局可制定政策,以增加对P4P项目的参与,并鼓励持续改善医疗结果。

相似文献

1
Does pay-for-performance benefit patients with multiple chronic conditions? Evidence from a universal coverage health care system.绩效薪酬对患有多种慢性病的患者有益吗?来自全民医保体系的证据。
Health Policy Plan. 2016 Feb;31(1):83-90. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czv024. Epub 2015 May 5.
2
Does the pay-for-performance programme reduce the emergency department visits for hypoglycaemia in type 2 diabetic patients?按绩效付费计划是否能减少2型糖尿病患者因低血糖而前往急诊科就诊的次数?
Health Policy Plan. 2014 Sep;29(6):732-41. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czt056. Epub 2013 Jul 26.
3
Disease-specific Pay-for-Performance Programs: Do the P4P Effects Differ Between Diabetic Patients With and Without Multiple Chronic Conditions?特定疾病绩效薪酬计划:患有和未患有多种慢性病的糖尿病患者的绩效薪酬效果是否不同?
Med Care. 2016 Nov;54(11):977-983. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000598.
4
Pay-for-performance programmes reduce stroke risks in patients with type 2 diabetes: a national cohort study.按绩效付费计划可降低2型糖尿病患者的中风风险:一项全国队列研究。
BMJ Open. 2019 Oct 16;9(10):e026626. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026626.
5
Patient assessment of diabetes care in a pay-for-performance program.按绩效付费项目中患者对糖尿病护理的评估。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2016 Apr;28(2):183-90. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzv120. Epub 2016 Jan 26.
6
A longitudinal examination of a pay-for-performance program for diabetes care: evidence from a natural experiment.一项糖尿病护理按效付费计划的纵向考察:来自自然实验的证据。
Med Care. 2012 Feb;50(2):109-16. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31822d5d36.
7
Patient and provider factors associated with enrolment in the pre-end-stage renal disease pay-for-performance programme in Taiwan: a cross-sectional study.台湾终末期肾病前绩效付费计划参与情况相关的患者和提供者因素:一项横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2019 Sep 13;9(9):e031354. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031354.
8
The effect of a PPO pay-for-performance program on patients with diabetes.按服务付费的 PPO 方案对糖尿病患者的影响。
Am J Manag Care. 2010 Jan 1;16(1):e11-9.
9
Factors related to continuing care and interruption of P4P program participation in patients with diabetes.与糖尿病患者持续护理及参与按绩效付费计划中断相关的因素。
Am J Manag Care. 2016 Jan 1;22(1):e18-30.
10
Synergy between the pay-for-performance scheme and better physician-patient relationship might reduce the risk of retinopathy in patients with type 2 diabetes.支付绩效计划与改善医患关系之间的协同作用可能会降低 2 型糖尿病患者发生视网膜病变的风险。
J Diabetes Investig. 2021 May;12(5):819-827. doi: 10.1111/jdi.13422. Epub 2020 Nov 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Is the pay-for-performance program associated with better quality of life among type 2 diabetes patients, including those with gastrointestinal conditions, in Taiwan? A cross-sectional survey.在台湾,绩效薪酬计划是否与2型糖尿病患者(包括患有胃肠道疾病的患者)更好的生活质量相关?一项横断面调查。
PLoS One. 2025 Aug 22;20(8):e0328910. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0328910. eCollection 2025.
2
Understanding Gaps in the Hypertension and Diabetes Care Cascade: Systematic Scoping Review.了解高血压和糖尿病护理级联中的差距:系统范围综述。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2024 Feb 16;10:e51802. doi: 10.2196/51802.
3
Participation and Outcomes among Disabled and Non-Disabled People in the Diabetes Pay-for-Performance Program.
糖尿病绩效付费项目中残疾人和非残疾人的参与情况及结果
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Oct 16;11(20):2742. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11202742.
4
Impact of a diabetes pay-for-performance program on nonincentivized mental disorders: a panel study based on claims database analysis.糖尿病绩效薪酬计划对非激励性精神障碍的影响:基于索赔数据库分析的面板研究。
Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2023 Jul 6;21(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s12962-023-00450-y.
5
Incentives Promoting Contracted Family Doctor Service Policy to Improve Continuity and Coordination in Diabetes Patient Management Care in China.促进签约家庭医生服务政策以改善中国糖尿病患者管理护理中的连续性和协调性的激励措施。
Front Public Health. 2022 Jul 15;10:843217. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.843217. eCollection 2022.
6
Pay-for-performance and continuity of care synergistically reduced amputation of lower extremity in patients with diabetes: a population-based cohort study.按效付费和连续性护理协同作用降低了糖尿病患者下肢截肢的发生率:一项基于人群的队列研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Jun 4;22(1):748. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08075-2.
7
Do financial aspects affect care transitions in long-term care systems? A systematic review.财务方面是否会影响长期护理系统中的护理过渡?一项系统综述。
Arch Public Health. 2022 Mar 23;80(1):90. doi: 10.1186/s13690-022-00829-y.
8
Chronic care model in the diabetes pay-for-performance program in Taiwan: Benefits, challenges and future directions.台湾糖尿病按绩效付费计划中的慢性病照护模式:益处、挑战与未来方向。
World J Diabetes. 2021 May 15;12(5):578-589. doi: 10.4239/wjd.v12.i5.578.
9
Continuity of care: evaluating a multidisciplinary care model for people with early CKD via a nationwide population-based longitudinal study.连续性护理:通过一项基于全国人群的纵向研究评估早期慢性肾脏病患者的多学科护理模式。
BMJ Open. 2020 Dec 29;10(12):e041149. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-041149.
10
Assessing the quality of primary healthcare for diabetes in China: multivariate analysis using the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS) Database.评估中国糖尿病初级医疗保健的质量:利用中国健康与养老追踪调查(CHARLS)数据库进行的多变量分析。
BMJ Open. 2020 Dec 13;10(12):e035192. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035192.