Suppr超能文献

比较美国和丹麦乳腺钼靶筛查的敏感性和特异性。

Comparing sensitivity and specificity of screening mammography in the United States and Denmark.

作者信息

Kemp Jacobsen Katja, O'Meara Ellen S, Key Dustin, S M Buist Diana, Kerlikowske Karla, Vejborg Ilse, Sprague Brian L, Lynge Elsebeth, von Euler-Chelpin My

机构信息

Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen K, Denmark.

Group Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA.

出版信息

Int J Cancer. 2015 Nov 1;137(9):2198-207. doi: 10.1002/ijc.29593. Epub 2015 Jun 1.

Abstract

Delivery of screening mammography differs substantially between the United States (US) and Denmark. We evaluated whether there are differences in screening sensitivity and specificity. We included screens from women screened at age 50-69 years during 1996-2008/2009 in the US Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium (BCSC) (n = 2,872,791), and from two population-based mammography screening programs in Denmark (Copenhagen, n = 148,156 and Funen, n = 275,553). Women were followed-up for 1 year. For initial screens, recall rate was significantly higher in BCSC (17.6%) than in Copenhagen (4.3%) and Funen (3.1%). Sensitivity was fairly similar in BCSC (91.8%) and Copenhagen (90.5%) and Funen (92.5%). At subsequent screens, recall rates were 8.8%, 1.8% and 1.4% in BCSC, Copenhagen and Funen, respectively. The BCSC sensitivity (82.3%) was lower compared with that in Copenhagen (88.9%) and Funen (86.9%), but when stratified by time since last screen, the sensitivity was similar. For both initial and subsequent screenings, the specificity of screening in BCSC (83.2% and 91.6%) was significantly lower than that in Copenhagen (96.6% and 98.8%) and Funen (97.9% and 99.2%). By taking time since last screen into account, it was found that American and Danish women had the same probability of having their asymptomatic cancers detected at screening. However, the majority of women free of asymptomatic cancers experienced more harms in terms of false-positive findings in the US than in Denmark.

摘要

美国和丹麦在乳腺钼靶筛查的实施方面存在显著差异。我们评估了筛查敏感性和特异性是否存在差异。我们纳入了1996年至2008年/2009年期间在美国乳腺癌监测协会(BCSC)接受筛查的50至69岁女性的筛查数据(n = 2,872,791),以及丹麦两个基于人群的乳腺钼靶筛查项目的数据(哥本哈根,n = 148,156;菲英岛,n = 275,553)。对女性进行了1年的随访。对于初次筛查,BCSC的召回率(17.6%)显著高于哥本哈根(4.3%)和菲英岛(3.1%)。BCSC(91.8%)、哥本哈根(90.5%)和菲英岛(92.5%)的敏感性相当相似。在后续筛查中,BCSC、哥本哈根和菲英岛的召回率分别为8.8%、1.8%和1.4%。BCSC的敏感性(82.3%)低于哥本哈根(88.9%)和菲英岛(86.9%),但按上次筛查后的时间分层后,敏感性相似。对于初次和后续筛查,BCSC筛查的特异性(83.2%和91.6%)均显著低于哥本哈根(96.6%和98.8%)和菲英岛(97.9%和99.2%)。考虑到上次筛查后的时间,发现美国和丹麦女性在筛查中检测出无症状癌症的概率相同。然而,在美国,大多数没有无症状癌症的女性在假阳性结果方面比丹麦女性遭受了更多伤害。

相似文献

5
Seventeen-years overview of breast cancer inside and outside screening in Denmark.丹麦乳腺癌筛查内外 17 年概述。
Acta Oncol. 2013 Jan;52(1):48-56. doi: 10.3109/0284186X.2012.698750. Epub 2012 Sep 3.
6
Is mammography screening history a predictor of future breast cancer risk?乳腺 X 线筛查史能否预测未来乳腺癌风险?
Eur J Epidemiol. 2015 Feb;30(2):143-9. doi: 10.1007/s10654-014-9972-6. Epub 2014 Nov 25.
9
Does educational level determine screening participation?教育水平决定筛查参与情况吗?
Eur J Cancer Prev. 2008 Jun;17(3):273-8. doi: 10.1097/CEJ.0b013e3282f0c017.

引用本文的文献

8
Malmö Breast ImaginG database: objectives and development.马尔默乳腺成像数据库:目标与发展
J Med Imaging (Bellingham). 2023 Nov;10(6):061402. doi: 10.1117/1.JMI.10.6.061402. Epub 2023 Feb 8.

本文引用的文献

2
Seventeen-years overview of breast cancer inside and outside screening in Denmark.丹麦乳腺癌筛查内外 17 年概述。
Acta Oncol. 2013 Jan;52(1):48-56. doi: 10.3109/0284186X.2012.698750. Epub 2012 Sep 3.
4
Performance indicators for participation in organized mammography screening.参加有组织的乳房 X 光筛查的绩效指标。
J Public Health (Oxf). 2012 Jun;34(2):272-8. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdr106. Epub 2012 Jan 10.
7
Breast cancer incidence and use of hormone therapy in Denmark 1978-2007.1978-2007 年丹麦乳腺癌发病率与激素疗法应用情况。
Cancer Causes Control. 2011 Feb;22(2):181-7. doi: 10.1007/s10552-010-9685-4. Epub 2010 Nov 20.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验