• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中国农村地区农民与非农民主观经济地位对心理困扰的影响

Effect of subjective economic status on psychological distress among farmers and non-farmers of rural China.

作者信息

Feng Danjun, Ji Linqin, Xu Lingzhong

机构信息

School of Nursing, Shandong University, Jinan, China.

School of Psychology, Shandong Normal University, Jinan, China.

出版信息

Aust J Rural Health. 2015 Aug;23(4):215-20. doi: 10.1111/ajr.12187. Epub 2015 May 6.

DOI:10.1111/ajr.12187
PMID:25945684
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to compare the prevalence of psychological distress between farmers and non-farmers of rural China. Further, this examines the effect of subjective economic status on psychological distress and whether this effect varies between farmers and non-farmers.

DESIGN

The study design is a cross-sectional survey.

SETTING

The study was conducted in 27 villages of Dongying City in Shandong Province.

PARTICIPANTS

Rural employed people included 1433 farmers and 584 non-farmers.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Psychological distress was assessed by the Kessler 10 questionnaire, and subjective economic status was assessed by a single question.

RESULTS

Overall, the farmers did not report significantly higher prevalence of psychological distress than non-farmers (31.13% versus 30.01%). However, the farmers aged 51-70 years did report significantly higher psychological distress than their non-farmer counterparts (33.4% versus 24.2%, P = 0.04). Second, subjective economic status had a significant (β = -0.28, P < 0.001) effect on psychological distress. Finally, subjective economic status exerted a stronger effect on psychological distress among farmers (β = 0.30, P < 0.001) than among non-farmers (β = 0.20, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The farmers had a comparable prevalence of psychological distress when compared with non-farmers in rural China. Subjective economic status exerted a significant effect on the psychological distress of rural employed people, and this effect was stronger for the farmers than for the non-farmers.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较中国农村地区农民与非农民心理困扰的患病率。此外,本研究还考察主观经济状况对心理困扰的影响,以及这种影响在农民和非农民之间是否存在差异。

设计

本研究采用横断面调查设计。

地点

本研究在山东省东营市的27个村庄进行。

参与者

农村就业人员包括1433名农民和584名非农民。

主要观察指标

采用凯斯勒10项问卷评估心理困扰,通过一个单一问题评估主观经济状况。

结果

总体而言,农民报告的心理困扰患病率并不显著高于非农民(31.13%对30.01%)。然而,51至70岁的农民报告的心理困扰显著高于非农民同龄人(33.4%对24.2%,P = 0.04)。其次,主观经济状况对心理困扰有显著影响(β = -0.28,P < 0.001)。最后,主观经济状况对农民心理困扰的影响(β = 0.30,P < 0.001)比对非农民的影响(β = 0.20,P < 0.001)更强。

结论

与中国农村地区的非农民相比,农民的心理困扰患病率相当。主观经济状况对农村就业人员的心理困扰有显著影响,且这种影响对农民比对非农民更强。

相似文献

1
Effect of subjective economic status on psychological distress among farmers and non-farmers of rural China.中国农村地区农民与非农民主观经济地位对心理困扰的影响
Aust J Rural Health. 2015 Aug;23(4):215-20. doi: 10.1111/ajr.12187. Epub 2015 May 6.
2
The influence of social support, lifestyle and functional disability on psychological distress in rural China: structural equation modelling.社会支持、生活方式和功能残疾对中国农村地区心理困扰的影响:结构方程模型
Aust J Rural Health. 2013 Feb;21(1):13-9. doi: 10.1111/ajr.12009.
3
Perceived profitability and well-being in Australian dryland farmers and irrigators.澳大利亚旱地农民和灌溉农民对盈利能力和幸福感的认知
Aust J Rural Health. 2015 Aug;23(4):207-14. doi: 10.1111/ajr.12176. Epub 2015 Mar 25.
4
Prevalence of psychological distress, anxiety and depression in rural communities in Australia.澳大利亚农村社区心理困扰、焦虑和抑郁的患病率。
Aust J Rural Health. 2007 Apr;15(2):114-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1584.2007.00863.x.
5
Survey on Tuberculosis Patients in Rural Areas in China: Tracing the Role of Stigma in Psychological Distress.中国农村地区肺结核患者调查:探寻耻辱感在心理困扰中的作用。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Oct 4;14(10):1171. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14101171.
6
The impact of subjective and objective social status on psychological distress among men and women in Japan.主观和客观社会地位对日本男女心理困扰的影响。
Soc Sci Med. 2010 Jun;70(11):1832-9. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.01.019. Epub 2010 Feb 12.
7
Tobacco Smoking and Use of Smokeless Tobacco and Their Association with Psychological Distress and Other Factors in a Rural District in Bangladesh: A Cross-Sectional Study.孟加拉国一个农村地区的烟草吸烟和使用无烟烟草及其与心理困扰及其他因素的关系:一项横断面研究。
J Environ Public Health. 2019 Dec 6;2019:1424592. doi: 10.1155/2019/1424592. eCollection 2019.
8
Psychological distress among mountainous farmers in Vietnam: a cross-sectional study of prevalence and associated factors.越南山区农民的心理困扰:一项关于患病率及相关因素的横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2020 Aug 6;10(8):e038490. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038490.
9
Social determinants and psychological distress among Aboriginal and Torres Strait islander adults in the Australian state of Victoria: a cross-sectional population based study.澳大利亚维多利亚州原住民和托雷斯海峡岛民成年人的社会决定因素和心理困扰:一项基于人群的横断面研究。
Soc Sci Med. 2015 Mar;128:178-87. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.01.014. Epub 2015 Jan 14.
10
Employee psychological distress and treated prevalence by indices of rurality.员工心理困扰与农村指数相关的治疗流行率。
Aust N Z J Public Health. 2010 Oct;34(5):458-65. doi: 10.1111/j.1753-6405.2010.00590.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Where you live, what you do: depression differences among diverse Chinese nongmin through cognitive openness.你居住的地方、你的职业:通过认知开放性探讨不同中国农民群体中的抑郁差异。
Front Psychiatry. 2025 Jan 31;16:1433949. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1433949. eCollection 2025.
2
Mental health among the sugarcane industry farmers and non-farmers in Peru: a cross-sectional study on occupational health.秘鲁蔗农和非蔗农的精神健康:一项关于职业健康的横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2022 Nov 11;12(11):e064396. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-064396.
3
Magnitude and factors associated with postoperative depression among adult orthopedics patients during COVID-19 pandemics: A multi-center cross-sectional study.
新冠疫情期间成年骨科患者术后抑郁的严重程度及相关因素:一项多中心横断面研究
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Jul 29;13:965035. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.965035. eCollection 2022.
4
Socioeconomic Disparities in Disability-Free Life Expectancy and Life Expectancy Among Older Chinese Adults From a 7-Year Prospective Cohort Study.中国老年人 7 年前瞻性队列研究中无残疾预期寿命和预期寿命的社会经济差异。
Int J Public Health. 2022 Jul 7;67:1604242. doi: 10.3389/ijph.2022.1604242. eCollection 2022.
5
A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Depression among Farming Populations Worldwide.全球农业人口群体中的抑郁症状:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Dec 15;17(24):9376. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17249376.
6
Chronotype and psychological distress among Chinese rural population: A moderated mediation model of sleep quality and age.中国人的睡眠类型与心理困扰:基于睡眠质量和年龄的有调节的中介模型
PLoS One. 2020 Oct 30;15(10):e0241301. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0241301. eCollection 2020.
7
Psychological distress among mountainous farmers in Vietnam: a cross-sectional study of prevalence and associated factors.越南山区农民的心理困扰:一项关于患病率及相关因素的横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2020 Aug 6;10(8):e038490. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038490.
8
Social Activities and Health-Related Quality of Life in Rural Older Adults in South Korea: A 4-Year Longitudinal Analysis.韩国农村老年人的社交活动与健康相关生活质量:一项为期 4 年的纵向分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jul 31;17(15):5553. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17155553.
9
Gender Differences in Depressive Symptoms and Work Environment Factors among Dairy Farmers in Japan.日本奶农抑郁症状与工作环境因素的性别差异。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Apr 9;17(7):2569. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17072569.
10
Key Risk Factors Affecting Farmers' Mental Health: A Systematic Review.影响农民心理健康的关键风险因素:系统评价。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Dec 2;16(23):4849. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16234849.